| Literature DB >> 28770175 |
Jin Cui1,2,3, Nannan Qu1,2,3, Yang Guo1,2,3, Lan Cao1,4, Siyu Wu1,2,3, Kun Mei1,2,3, Hailiang Sun1,2,3, Yiliang Lu5,6, Zhifeng Qin5, Peirong Jiao1,2,3, Ming Liao1,2,3.
Abstract
We analyzed fiveEntities:
Keywords: H5N1; chicken; highly pathogenic avian influenza virus; pathogenicity; phylogeny; transmission
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28770175 PMCID: PMC5515836 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of HA. HA(A): nucleotides (nt) 29–1,732. Triangles indicate viruses characterized in this study, other virus sequence were downloaded from GenBank. QH, Qinghai; VN, Vietnam; IDN, Indonesia; GY, Guiyang; MG, Mongolia; GX, Guangxi; HD, Huadong; SX, Shanxi.
Figure 2Phylogenetic analysis of NA. NA: nt19–1,380. Except our isolate, other virus sequences were downloaded from GenBank. QH, Qinghai; VN, Vietnam; IDN, Indonesia; GY, Guiyang; MG, Mongolia; GX, Guangxi; HD, Huadong; SX, Shanxi.
Figure 3Phylogenetic analysis of PA. PA: nt 25–2,175. Except our isolate, other virus sequences were downloaded from GenBank. QH, Qinghai; VN, Vietnam; IDN, Indonesia; GY, Guiyang; MG, Mongolia; GX, Guangxi; HD, Huadong; SX, Shanxi.
Figure 4Phylogenetic analysis of PB1. PB1: nt 25–2,298. Except our isolate, other virus sequences were downloaded from GenBank. QH, Qinghai; VN, Vietnam; IDN, Indonesia; GY, Guiyang; MG, Mongolia; GX, Guangxi; HD, Huadong; SX, Shanxi.
Figure 5Phylogenetic analysis of PB2. PB2: nt 28–230. Except our isolate, other virus sequences were downloaded from GenBank. QH, Qinghai; VN, Vietnam; IDN, Indonesia; GY, Guiyang; MG, Mongolia; GX, Guangxi; HD, Huadong; SX, Shanxi.
Figure 6Phylogenetic analysis of NP. NP: nt46–1,542. Except our isolate, other virus sequences were downloaded from GenBank. QH, Qinghai; VN, Vietnam; IDN, Indonesia; GY, Guiyang; MG, Mongolia; GX, Guangxi; HD, Huadong; SX, Shanxi.
Figure 7Phylogenetic analysis of M. M: nt26–795. Except our isolate, other virus sequences were downloaded from GenBank. QH, Qinghai; VN, Vietnam; IDN, Indonesia; GY, Guiyang; MG, Mongolia; GX, Guangxi; HD, Huadong; SX, Shanxi.
Figure 8Phylogenetic analysis of NS. NS: nt27–678. Except our isolate, other virus sequences were downloaded from GenBank. QH, Qinghai; VN, Vietnam; IDN, Indonesia; GY, Guiyang; MG, Mongolia; GX, Guangxi; HD, Huadong; SX, Shanxi.
Genotypic evolution of the H5N1 viruses isolated in China in 2012.
| A/DK/CN/E26/2012 | MG | MG | MG | MG | MG | GX | MG | MG | 1 | DK |
| A/GS/CN/E43/2012 | GX | GX | GX | GX | GX | GX | GX | GX | 2 | GS |
| A/DK/CN/E53/2012 | MG | GX | GX | GX | GX | GX | GX | GX | 3 | DK |
| A/CK/CN/E93/2012 | SX | SX | SX | HD | SX | GY | SX | SX | 4 | CK |
| A/CK/CN/E96/2012 | SX | SX | SX | HD | SX | GY | SX | SX | 4 | CK |
The eight gene segments are indicated at the top of each bar. The number in each bar shows the group of genes indicated in Figures .
Cleavage site and potential glycosylation sites in HA of the five H5N1 HPAIVs.
| 341–361/342–347 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −RRRKR/G– | |||||||||||||||
| DKE26 | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| GSE43 | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| DKE53 | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | + |
| CKE93 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | + | + | + |
| CKE96 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | + | + | + |
The “+” means the amino acid sequences of glycosylation sites are same with list above.
The “−” means the glycosylation sites are lost.
Figure 9Lethality of the A/GS/CN/E43/2012 and A/CK/CN/E93/2012 viruses in SPF chicken. Death patterns of the SPF chicken infected with A/GS/CN/E43/2012 and A/CK/CN/E93/2012 viruses with the doses of 103 EID50. Curves are significantly different (P < 0.05) by log-rank analysis.
Replication and lethality in chickens of the H5N1 viruses after inoculated intranasally.
| GSE43 | Clade 2.3.2.1.B | 6.8 | Infected | 6.63 | 8.63 | 8.63 | 7.75 | 8.63 | 8.63 |
| Contact | 6.63 | 8.63 | 8.63 | 8.00 ± 1.41 | 7.81 ± 1.15 | 7.81 ± 1.15 | |||
| CKE93 | Clade 7.2 | 7.3 | Infected | 3.67 | 3.00 | 3.67 | 4.00 | 3.75 | 3.67 |
| Contact | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||
Four-week-old SPF chickens were inoculated intranasally (i.n.) with 10.
For statistical analysis, a value of 1.5 was assigned if the virus was not detected from the undiluted sample in three embryonated hen eggs. Virus titers are expressed as means standard deviation in log10EID.
Ducks inoculated with virus.
Naive contact ducks housed with those inoculated.
Virus titers in cloacal and oropharyngeal swabs from SPF chicken.
| GSE43 | Infected | 0/3 | 1/3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | – | – |
| Contact | 1/3 | 0/3 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| CKE93 | Infected | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| Contact | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | |
For statistical purposes, a value of 1.5 was assigned if virus was not detected from the undiluted sample in three embryonated hen's eggs (Sun et al., .
Chickens inoculated with virus.
Naive contact chickens housed with those inoculated.