| Literature DB >> 28768888 |
Jerome Clifford Foo1,2, Hamid Reza Noori3,4, Ikuhiro Yamaguchi1, Valentina Vengeliene5, Alejandro Cosa-Linan5, Toru Nakamura1, Kenji Morita1, Rainer Spanagel6, Yoshiharu Yamamoto7.
Abstract
The theory of critical transitions in complex systems (ecosystems, climate, etc.), and especially its ability to predict abrupt changes by early-warning signals based on analysis of fluctuations close to tipping points, is seen as a promising avenue to study disease dynamics. However, the biomedical field still lacks a clear demonstration of this concept. Here, we used a well-established animal model in which initial alcohol exposure followed by deprivation and subsequent reintroduction of alcohol induces excessive alcohol drinking as an example of disease onset. Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) of rat drinking behaviour and locomotor activity were acquired by a fully automated drinkometer device over 14 weeks. Dynamical characteristics of ILD were extracted using a multi-scale computational approach. Our analysis shows a transition into addictive behaviour preceded by early-warning signals such as instability of drinking patterns and locomotor circadian rhythms, and a resultant increase in low frequency, ultradian rhythms during the first week of deprivation. We find evidence that during prolonged deprivation, a critical transition takes place pushing the system to excessive alcohol consumption. This study provides an adaptable framework for processing ILD from clinical studies and for examining disease dynamics and early-warning signals in the biomedical field.Entities:
Keywords: alcoholism; critical transition; drinking behaviour; early-warning signals; locomotor activity
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28768888 PMCID: PMC5563804 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 1.Drinking behaviour. (a) Ethanol (EtOH) consumption, (b) EtOH preference and (c) stay ratio. (d) Transition matrices showing transitions between alcoholic solutions for experimental periods. Error bars show s.e.m., N.B. no alcohol was in bottles during DEPwk1 and DEPwk2. DEPwk2 had extremely low numbers of accesses; stay ratio is for illustrative purposes only. ***p < 0.001; *p < 0.05.
Figure 2.Intermittency in locomotor activity patterns. Cumulative probability distributions (discrete distributions taking integer values, given bin widths of 1 min) of resting periods in BASE and ERwk4, where γ is the slope. Inset shows decreases in scaling exponent γ over experimental periods indicating increased resting. We set the final fitting range to 1–10 min, and the data greater than this range did not affect the calculation of scaling exponent γ. Probability distribution error bars show s.d. (one-side shown only for visibility). Error bars on inset show s.e.m. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01.
Figure 3.Statistical moments of locomotor activity. Decreased mean (a) and variance (b) accompanied by increased skewness (c) suggestive of increased intermittency. Error bars show s.e.m. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Figure 4.Instability during DEPwk1 bridges two stable states. (a) Wavelet time–frequency analysis and (b) phase space plots showing circadian trajectories for a representative animal over experimental periods. Group average (c) relative ultradian power, (d) circadian band power, and (e) two-dimensional entropy of the phase space plots. (f) Schematic illustrating limit-cycle trajectories in different states. Error bars show s.e.m. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.