Christopher P Cannon1,2, Irfan Khan3, Alexa C Klimchak4, Matthew R Reynolds1,5, Robert J Sanchez6, William J Sasiela7. 1. Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey. 4. Axtria, Berkeley Heights, New Jersey. 5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts. 6. Medical Affairs, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York. 7. Program Direction, Cardiovascular and Metabolism, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.
Abstract
Importance: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), guidelines recommend optimizing statin treatment, and consensus pathways suggest use of ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in patients with persistently elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels despite use of statins. Recent trials have provided evidence of benefit in reduction of cardiovascular events with these agents. Objective: To estimate the percentage of patients with ASCVD who would require a PCSK9 inhibitor when oral lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is intensified first. Design, Setting, and Participants: This simulation model study used a large administrative database of US medical and pharmacy claims to identify a cohort of 105 269 patients with ASCVD enrolled from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013, who met the inclusion criteria (database cohort). Patients were sampled with replacement (bootstrapping) to match the US epidemiologic distribution and entered into a Monte Carlo simulation (simulation cohort) that applied stepwise treatment intensification algorithms in those with LDL-C levels of at least 70 mg/dL. All patients not initially receiving a statin were given atorvastatin, 20 mg, and the following LLT intensification steps were applied: uptitration to atorvastatin, 80 mg; add-on ezetimibe therapy; add-on alirocumab therapy, 75 mg (a PCSK9 inhibitor); and uptitration to alirocumab, 150 mg. Sensitivity analyses included evolocumab as a PCSK9 inhibitor. Efficacy was estimated from published studies and incorporated patient-level variation. Data were analyzed from December 2015 to May 2017. Exposures: Treatment intensification strategies with LLT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of LLT among the population with ASCVD and distributions of LDL-C levels under various treatment intensification scenarios. Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 105 269 individuals in the database cohort (57.2% male and 42.8% female; mean [SD] age, 65.1 [12.1] years). In the simulation cohort (1 million patients; 54.8% male and 45.2% female; mean [SD] age, 66.4 [12.2] years), before treatment intensification, 51.5% used statin monotherapy and 1.7% used statins plus ezetimibe. Only 25.2% achieved an LDL-C level of less than 70 mg/dL. After treatment intensification, 99.3% could achieve an LDL-C level of less than 70 mg/dL, including 67.3% with statin monotherapy, 18.7% with statins plus ezetimibe, and 14% with add-on PCSK9 inhibitor. Conclusions and Relevance: Large gaps exist between recommendations and current practice regarding LLT in the population with ASCVD. In our model that assumes no LLT intolerance and full adherence, intensification of oral LLT could achieve an LDL-C level of less than 70 mg/dL in most patients, with only a modest percentage requiring a PCSK9 inhibitor.
Importance: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), guidelines recommend optimizing statin treatment, and consensus pathways suggest use of ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in patients with persistently elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels despite use of statins. Recent trials have provided evidence of benefit in reduction of cardiovascular events with these agents. Objective: To estimate the percentage of patients with ASCVD who would require a PCSK9 inhibitor when oral lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is intensified first. Design, Setting, and Participants: This simulation model study used a large administrative database of US medical and pharmacy claims to identify a cohort of 105 269 patients with ASCVD enrolled from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013, who met the inclusion criteria (database cohort). Patients were sampled with replacement (bootstrapping) to match the US epidemiologic distribution and entered into a Monte Carlo simulation (simulation cohort) that applied stepwise treatment intensification algorithms in those with LDL-C levels of at least 70 mg/dL. All patients not initially receiving a statin were given atorvastatin, 20 mg, and the following LLT intensification steps were applied: uptitration to atorvastatin, 80 mg; add-on ezetimibe therapy; add-on alirocumab therapy, 75 mg (a PCSK9 inhibitor); and uptitration to alirocumab, 150 mg. Sensitivity analyses included evolocumab as a PCSK9 inhibitor. Efficacy was estimated from published studies and incorporated patient-level variation. Data were analyzed from December 2015 to May 2017. Exposures: Treatment intensification strategies with LLT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of LLT among the population with ASCVD and distributions of LDL-C levels under various treatment intensification scenarios. Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 105 269 individuals in the database cohort (57.2% male and 42.8% female; mean [SD] age, 65.1 [12.1] years). In the simulation cohort (1 million patients; 54.8% male and 45.2% female; mean [SD] age, 66.4 [12.2] years), before treatment intensification, 51.5% used statin monotherapy and 1.7% used statins plus ezetimibe. Only 25.2% achieved an LDL-C level of less than 70 mg/dL. After treatment intensification, 99.3% could achieve an LDL-C level of less than 70 mg/dL, including 67.3% with statin monotherapy, 18.7% with statins plus ezetimibe, and 14% with add-on PCSK9 inhibitor. Conclusions and Relevance: Large gaps exist between recommendations and current practice regarding LLT in the population with ASCVD. In our model that assumes no LLT intolerance and full adherence, intensification of oral LLT could achieve an LDL-C level of less than 70 mg/dL in most patients, with only a modest percentage requiring a PCSK9 inhibitor.
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jennifer G Robinson; Robert S Rosenson; Michel Farnier; Umesh Chaudhari; William J Sasiela; Laurence Merlet; Kathryn Miller; John J P Kastelein Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Salim S Virani; Julia M Akeroyd; Vijay Nambi; Paul A Heidenreich; Pamela B Morris; Khurram Nasir; Erin D Michos; Vera A Bittner; Laura A Petersen; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Pamela B Morris; Christie M Ballantyne; Kim K Birtcher; David D Daly; Sondra M DePalma; Margo B Minissian; Carl E Orringer; Sidney C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Björn W Karlson; Olov Wiklund; Michael K Palmer; Stephen J Nicholls; Pia Lundman; Philip J Barter Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother Date: 2016-03-29
Authors: Gregory G Schwartz; Laurence Bessac; Lisa G Berdan; Deepak L Bhatt; Vera Bittner; Rafael Diaz; Shaun G Goodman; Corinne Hanotin; Robert A Harrington; J Wouter Jukema; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Angèle Moryusef; Robert Pordy; Matthew T Roe; Tyrus Rorick; William J Sasiela; Cheerag Shirodaria; Michael Szarek; Jean-François Tamby; Pierluigi Tricoci; Harvey White; Andreas Zeiher; Philippe Gabriel Steg Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: C Baigent; L Blackwell; J Emberson; L E Holland; C Reith; N Bhala; R Peto; E H Barnes; A Keech; J Simes; R Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Julius L Katzmann; Marita Kieble; Salka Enners; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud; Ulrich Laufs; Martin Schulz Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Dylan L Steen; Irfan Khan; Katherine Andrade; Alexandra Koumas; Robert P Giugliano Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Dennis T Ko; Anam M Khan; Gynter Kotrri; Peter C Austin; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Maria Koh; Anna Chu; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Patrick R Lawler; Jack V Tu Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Ali Allahyari; Tomas Jernberg; Emil Hagström; Margrét Leosdottir; Pia Lundman; Peter Ueda Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ali Allahyari; Tomas Jernberg; Dominik Lautsch; Pia Lundman; Emil Hagström; Jessica Schubert; Robert Boggs; Stina Salomonsson; Peter Ueda Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2021-01-25
Authors: Christopher P Cannon; James A de Lemos; Robert S Rosenson; Christie M Ballantyne; Yuyin Liu; Qi Gao; Tamara Palagashvilli; Shushama Alam; Katherine E Mues; Deepak L Bhatt; Mikhail N Kosiborod Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 14.676