Literature DB >> 2876722

Pharmacodynamic profile of bisoprolol, a new beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist.

G Leopold, W Ungethüm, J Pabst, Z Simane, K U Bühring, H Wiemann.   

Abstract

The pharmacodynamic profile of bisoprolol, a new beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist, was investigated in four independent studies including 36 healthy male volunteers. Using the model of exercise-induced tachycardia (ET) the beta-adrenoceptor blocking properties of bisoprolol (2.5-40 mg) were examined in comparison to metoprolol (50 and 100 mg), propranolol (40 and 80 mg) and atenolol (50 and 100 mg). The maximal reduction of ET was achieved between 1 and 4 h following single oral administration. The dose-response relationship using individual maximal reduction of ET showed, on a molar basis, that bisoprolol is about 5, 7 and 10 times more effective than propranolol, atenolol and metoprolol, respectively. In the model of insulin-induced hypoglycaemia bisoprolol behaved as a beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist. There was a good correlation (r = 0.94) between the log bisoprolol concentration and the reduction in exercise-induced tachycardia. Bisoprolol is a potent new cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with a competitive action at beta 1-adrenoceptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2876722      PMCID: PMC1401121          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb02890.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  22 in total

1.  Influence of metoprolol and propranolol on hemodynamic effects induced by physical work and isoprenaline.

Authors:  G Johnsson; G Nyberg; L Sölvell
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1975

2.  Comparison of the antilipolytic effect of metoprolol, acebutolol, and propranolol in man.

Authors:  R J Newman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-09-03

Review 3.  The assessment of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs in man.

Authors:  D G McDevitt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  The demonstration of atenolol as a beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug in man.

Authors:  J D Harry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Comparison of propranolol, metoprolol, and acebutolol on insulin-induced hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  R J Newman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-08-21

6.  Comparison of atenolol and propranolol during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  S P Deacon; D Barnett
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-07-31

7.  Relation of heart rate and systolic blood pressure to the onset of pain in angina pectoris.

Authors:  B F Robinson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Observations in man of hypoglycaemia during selective and non-selective beta-blockade.

Authors:  N M Davidson; R J Corrall; T R Shaw; E B French
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 0.729

9.  Antihypertensive effects of bisoprolol during once daily administration in patients with essential hypertension. A dose-ranging study with parallel groups.

Authors:  L Weiner; G Frithz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Characterization of [3H](+/-)carazolol binding to beta-adrenergic receptors. Application to study of beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes in canine ventricular myocardium and lung.

Authors:  A S Manalan; H R Besch; A M Watanabe
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comparison of bisoprolol and diazepam in the treatment of cardiac neurosis.

Authors:  R Fogari; A Zoppi; L Corradi; C Pasotti; G D Malamani; R Gradnik; D Bokor; C Gala
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  A randomized double-blind study of bisoprolol versus atenolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Authors:  M S Dixon; P Thomas; D J Sheridan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  A comparison of bisoprolol and atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  R Lewis; D Maclean; C Ioannides; A Johnston; D G McDevitt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Bisoprolol. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris.

Authors:  S G Lancaster; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Ethnic differences in response to beta-blockade: fact or artefact? A study with bisoprolol and propranolol.

Authors:  P H Joubert; C P Venter; A Wellstein
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Comparative effects of bisoprolol and acebutolol in smokers with airway obstruction.

Authors:  I Macquin-Mavier; F Roudot-Thoraval; C Clerici; C George; A Harf
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Formulary considerations in selection of beta-blockers.

Authors:  K C Yedinak
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Reduced beta-adrenergic receptor activation decreases G-protein expression and beta-adrenergic receptor kinase activity in porcine heart.

Authors:  P Ping; R Gelzer-Bell; D A Roth; D Kiel; P A Insel; H K Hammond
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Differential effects of beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists on central and peripheral blood pressure at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  James A Cockburn; Sally E Brett; Antoine Guilcher; Albert Ferro; James M Ritter; Philip J Chowienczyk
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Interaction of bisoprolol with cimetidine and rifampicin.

Authors:  W Kirch; I Rose; I Klingmann; J Pabst; E E Ohnhaus
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.