Literature DB >> 28766560

Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review.

Sanjay Sagar1,2, Stefan Dongus1,2, Anna Schoeni1,2, Katharina Roser1,2, Marloes Eeftens1,2, Benjamin Struchen1,2, Milena Foerster1,2, Noëmi Meier2,3, Seid Adem1,2, Martin Röösli1,2.   

Abstract

The impact of the introduction and advancement in communication technology in recent years on exposure level of the population is largely unknown. The main aim of this study is to systematically review literature on the distribution of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in the everyday environment in Europe and summarize key characteristics of various types of RF-EMF studies conducted in the European countries. We systematically searched the ISI Web of Science for relevant literature published between 1 January 2000 and 30 April 2015, which assessed RF-EMF exposure levels by any of the methods: spot measurements, personal measurement with trained researchers and personal measurement with volunteers. Twenty-one published studies met our eligibility criteria of which 10 were spot measurements studies, 5 were personal measurement studies with trained researchers (microenvironmental), 5 were personal measurement studies with volunteers and 1 was a mixed methods study combining data collected by volunteers and trained researchers. RF-EMF data included in the studies were collected between 2005 and 2013. The mean total RF-EMF exposure for spot measurements in European "Homes" and "Outdoor" microenvironments was 0.29 and 0.54 V/m, respectively. In the personal measurements studies with trained researchers, the mean total RF-EMF exposure was 0.24 V/m in "Home" and 0.76 V/m in "Outdoor". In the personal measurement studies with volunteers, the population weighted mean total RF-EMF exposure was 0.16 V/m in "Homes" and 0.20 V/m in "Outdoor". Among all European microenvironments in "Transportation", the highest mean total RF-EMF 1.96 V/m was found in trains of Belgium during 2007 where more than 95% of exposure was contributed by uplink. Typical RF-EMF exposure levels are substantially below regulatory limits. We found considerable differences between studies according to the type of measurements procedures, which precludes cross-country comparison or evaluating temporal trends. A comparable RF-EMF monitoring concept is needed to accurately identify typical RF-EMF exposure levels in the everyday environment.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28766560     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2017.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  36 in total

1.  Continuous electromagnetic radiation monitoring in the environment: analysis of the results in Greece.

Authors:  Athanasios Manassas; Achilles Boursianis; Theodoros Samaras; John N Sahalos
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Residential characteristics and radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposures from bedroom measurements in Germany.

Authors:  J Breckenkamp; M Blettner; J Schüz; C Bornkessel; S Schmiedel; B Schlehofer; G Berg-Beckhoff
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system.

Authors:  Jimmy Estenberg; Torsten Augustsson
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.010

4.  Comparison of temporal realistic telecommunication base station exposure with worst-case estimation in two countries.

Authors:  Zaher Mahfouz; Leen Verloock; Wout Joseph; Emmeric Tanghe; Azeddine Gati; Joe Wiart; David Lautru; Victor Fouad Hanna; Luc Martens
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Assessment of radio frequency exposures in schools, homes, and public places in Belgium.

Authors:  Leen Verloock; Wout Joseph; Francis Goeminne; Luc Martens; Mart Verlaek; Kim Constandt
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields in households--trends from 2006 to 2012.

Authors:  Johannes Tomitsch; Engelbert Dechant
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 2.010

7.  What input data are needed to accurately model electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations?

Authors:  Johan Beekhuizen; Hans Kromhout; Alfred Bürgi; Anke Huss; Roel Vermeulen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in The Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area.

Authors:  John F B Bolte; Tessa Eikelboom
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Do people understand IARC's 2B categorization of RF fields from cell phones?

Authors:  Peter M Wiedemann; Franziska U Boerner; Michael H Repacholi
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.010

10.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  G Berg-Beckhoff; M Blettner; B Kowall; J Breckenkamp; B Schlehofer; S Schmiedel; C Bornkessel; U Reis; P Potthoff; J Schüz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of statistic methods for censored personal exposure to RF-EMF data.

Authors:  Alberto Najera; Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez; Enrique Arribas; Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Exposure Assessment in Indoor Environments: A Review.

Authors:  Emma Chiaramello; Marta Bonato; Serena Fiocchi; Gabriella Tognola; Marta Parazzini; Paolo Ravazzani; Joe Wiart
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Assessment of Personal Occupational Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in Libraries and Media Libraries, Using Calibrated On-Body Exposimeters.

Authors:  Amelie Massardier-Pilonchery; Elena Nerrière; Sophie Croidieu; Fabien Ndagijimana; François Gaudaire; Christophe Martinsons; Nicolas Noé; Martine Hours
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Microwaves from mobile phone induce reactive oxygen species but not DNA damage, preleukemic fusion genes and apoptosis in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Matus Durdik; Pavol Kosik; Eva Markova; Alexandra Somsedikova; Beata Gajdosechova; Ekaterina Nikitina; Eva Horvathova; Katarina Kozics; Devra Davis; Igor Belyaev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Exposure to radiofrequency radiation increases the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Shih; Anthony Paul O'Brien; Chin-Sheng Hung; Kee-Hsin Chen; Wen-Hsuan Hou; Hsiu-Ting Tsai
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Protocol for personal RF-EMF exposure measurement studies in 5th generation telecommunication networks.

Authors:  Maarten Velghe; Sam Aerts; Luc Martens; Wout Joseph; Arno Thielens
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Personal Exposure Assessment to Wi-Fi Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in Mexican Microenvironments.

Authors:  Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez; Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio; Isabel Escobar; Carmen Del Pilar Suarez Rodriguez; Enrique Arribas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Instruments to measure environmental and personal radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures: an update.

Authors:  Chhavi Raj Bhatt; Stuart Henderson; Chris Brzozek; Geza Benke
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 9.  Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses.

Authors:  Maël Dieudonné
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.