Literature DB >> 24737130

Do people understand IARC's 2B categorization of RF fields from cell phones?

Peter M Wiedemann1, Franziska U Boerner, Michael H Repacholi.   

Abstract

In May 2011, the International Agency on Cancer in Research (IARC) issued an official statement concluding that cell phone usage was "possibly carcinogenic to humans." There have been considerable doubts that non-experts and experts alike fully understood what IARC's categorization actually meant, as "possibly carcinogenic" can be interpreted in many ways. The present study is based on an online survey indicating that both the characterization of the probability of carcinogenicity, as well as the description of the risk increase given in the IARC press release, was mostly misunderstood by study participants. Respondents also greatly overestimated the magnitude of the potential risk. Our study results showed that IARC needs to improve their scientific communications.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IARC; health risk; mobile phones; risk assessment; risk communication

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24737130     DOI: 10.1002/bem.21851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  7 in total

Review 1.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sanjay Sagar; Stefan Dongus; Anna Schoeni; Katharina Roser; Marloes Eeftens; Benjamin Struchen; Milena Foerster; Noëmi Meier; Seid Adem; Martin Röösli
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  The Association Between Smartphone Use and Breast Cancer Risk Among Taiwanese Women: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Shih; Chin-Sheng Hung; Cheng-Chiao Huang; Kuei-Ru Chou; Shu-Fen Niu; Sally Chan; Hsiu-Ting Tsai
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 3.  International and national expert group evaluations: biological/health effects of radiofrequency fields.

Authors:  Maria R Scarfi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Exposure Knowledge and Risk Perception of RF EMF.

Authors:  Frederik Freudenstein; Peter M Wiedemann; Nadège Varsier
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-01-13

5.  An Experimental Study of Effects of Media Implication on Self-Report Symptoms Related With MP Use.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Fei-Zhou Zheng; Min-Di He; Min Li; Ping Deng; Zhou Zhou; Zheng-Ping Yu; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-13

6.  Wi-fi related radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF): a pilot experimental study of personal exposure and risk perception.

Authors:  Berihun M Zeleke; Christopher Brzozek; Chhavi R Bhatt; Michael J Abramson; Frederik Freudenstein; Rodney J Croft; Peter Wiedemann; Geza Benke
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 7.  Review of the Evidence that Transcranial Electromagnetic Treatment will be a Safe and Effective Therapeutic Against Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Gary W Arendash
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.472

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.