Literature DB >> 28766196

A Validated Nomogram to Predict Upstaging of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ to Invasive Disease.

James W Jakub1, Brittany L Murphy2,3, Alexandra B Gonzalez2, Amy L Conners4, Tara L Henrichsen4, Santo Maimone5, Michael G Keeney6, Sarah A McLaughlin7, Barbara A Pockaj8, Beiyun Chen6, Tashinga Musonza9, William S Harmsen10, Judy C Boughey2, Tina J Hieken2, Elizabeth B Habermann2,3,10, Harsh N Shah9, Amy C Degnim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 8-56% of patients with a core needle biopsy (CNB) diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) will be upstaged to invasive disease at the time of excision. Patients with invasive disease are recommended to undergo axillary nodal staging, most often requiring a second operation. We developed and validated a nomogram to preoperatively predict percentage of risk for upstaging to invasive cancer.
METHODS: We reviewed 834 cases of DCIS on CNB between January 2004 and October 2014. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate CNB and imaging factors to develop a nomogram to predict the risk of upstaging from DCIS to invasive cancer. This nomogram was validated with an external dataset of 579 similar patients between November 1998 and September 2016. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to evaluate nomogram discrimination.
RESULTS: The rate of upstaging to invasive disease was 118/834 (14.1%). On multivariable analysis, grade on CNB and imaging factors, including mass lesion, multicentric disease, and largest linear dimension, were associated with upstage to invasive disease, and was used to develop a nomogram (c-statistic 0.71). In the external validation dataset, 62/579 (10.7%) patients were upstaged to invasive disease. Our nomogram was validated in this dataset with a c-statistic of 0.71.
CONCLUSION: For patients with a CNB diagnosis of DCIS, our validated nomogram using DCIS grade on biopsy, and imaging factors of mass lesion, multicentric disease, and largest linear dimension, may be used for preoperative assessment of risk of upstaging to invasive disease, allowing patient counseling regarding axillary staging at the time of definitive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28766196     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5927-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in an era of de-escalation of therapy.

Authors:  Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast: update 2019.

Authors:  Sunil S Badve; Yesim Gökmen-Polar
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.306

3.  Dual-energy CT quantitative parameters for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions and the prediction of histopathological and molecular subtypes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Wang; Daihong Liu; Xiangfei Zeng; Shixi Jiang; Lan Li; Tao Yu; Jiuquan Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

4.  A prediction model for underestimation of invasive breast cancer after a biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: based on 2892 biopsies and 589 invasive cancers.

Authors:  Claudia J C Meurs; Joost van Rosmalen; Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers; Bert P M Ter Braak; Linda de Munck; Sabine Siesling; Pieter J Westenend
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  An Updated Nomogram for Predicting Invasiveness in Preoperative Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.

Authors:  Sanghwa Kim; Jihong Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Ha Yan Kim; Kwanbum Lee; Jeea Lee; Haemin Lee; Jee Ye Kim; Seung Il Kim; Young Up Cho; Byeong Woo Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 6.  A retrospective alternative for active surveillance trials for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Mieke R Van Bockstal; Marie C Agahozo; Linetta B Koppert; Carolien H M van Deurzen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Multiple Microinvasion Foci in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Recurrence and Worse Survival Outcome.

Authors:  Jing Si; Rong Guo; Huan Pan; Xiang Lu; Zhiqin Guo; Chao Han; Li Xue; Dan Xing; Wanxin Wu; Caiping Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Application of deep learning to predict underestimation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with ultrasound.

Authors:  Lang Qian; Zhikun Lv; Kai Zhang; Kun Wang; Qian Zhu; Shichong Zhou; Cai Chang; Jie Tian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

9.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: a risk prediction model for the underestimation of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Ko Woon Park; Seon Woo Kim; Heewon Han; Minsu Park; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Ji Soo Choi; Eun Yoon Cho; Soo Youn Cho; Eun Sook Ko
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 10.  Preneoplastic Low-Risk Mammary Ductal Lesions (Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Spectrum): Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Thaer Khoury
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.