| Literature DB >> 28766148 |
Ali Ahsan Bajwa1,2, Muhammad Javaid Akhter3,4, Nadeem Iqbal5,6, Arslan Masood Peerzada5, Zarka Hanif7, Sudheesh Manalil6,8,9, Saima Hashim10, Hafiz Haider Ali11, Lynda Kebaso5,6, David Frimpong5,6, Halima Namubiru6, Bhagirath Singh Chauhan6.
Abstract
Avena fatua and Avena ludoviciana are closely related grass weed species infesting a large number of crops around the world. These species are widely distributed in diverse agro-ecosystems from temperate to sub-tropical regions due to their unique seed traits, successful germination ecology, high competitive ability, and allelopathic potential. A. fatua is more widespread, adaptable, and problematic than A. ludoviciana. Both these species infest major winter and spring crops, including wheat, oat, barley, canola, maize, alfalfa, and sunflower, causing up to 70% yield losses depending on crop species and weed density. Chemical control has been challenged by large-scale herbicide resistance evolution in these weed species. A. fatua is the most widespread herbicide-resistant weed in the world, infesting about 5 million hectares in 13 countries. The use of alternative herbicides with different modes of action has proved effective. Several cultural practices, including diverse crop rotations, cover crops, improved crop competition (using competitive cultivars, high seed rates, narrow row spacing, altered crop geometry), and allelopathic suppression, have shown promise for controlling A. fatua and A. ludoviciana. The integrated use of these cultural methods can reduce the herbicide dose required, and lower dependency on herbicides to control these grasses. Moreover, integrated management may successfully control herbicide-resistant populations of these weed species. The use of integrated approaches based on the knowledge of biology and ecology of A. fatua and A. ludoviciana may help to manage them sustainably in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Cereals; Crop competition; Herbicide resistance; Weed management; Wild oats
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28766148 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9810-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223