| Literature DB >> 28765619 |
Pei-An Tang1, Jin-Yan Duan2, Hai-Jing Wu2, Xing-Rong Ju2, Ming-Long Yuan3.
Abstract
Cryptolestes ferrugineus is a serious pest of stored grain and has developed high levels of resistance to phosphine fumigants in many countries. Measuring differences in expression levels of certain 'resistant' genes by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) may provide insights into molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to phosphine in C. ferrugineus, but reliable qRT-PCR results depend on suitable reference genes (RGs). We evaluated the stability of nine candidate RGs across different developmental stages and phosphine strains of C. ferrugineus, using four softwares. The results showed that RPS13 and EF1α were the most stable RGs, whereas α-TUB was the least under developmental stages. Across the different strains, RPS13 and γ-TUB were the most stable RGs, whereas CycA and GAPDH were the least. We confirmed the reliability of the selected RGs by qRT-PCR analyses of the mitochondrial cox1 gene. Expression of cox1 was not significantly different in the phosphine-resistant strain compared with the phosphine-susceptible strain, but three mitochondrial genes (nad3, atp6 and cob) were significantly down-regulated. These results suggest that alterations in the expressions of these three genes may be associated with phosphine resistance in C. ferrugineus. The findings will facilitate future functional genomics studies on the development and phosphine resistance in C. ferrugineus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28765619 PMCID: PMC5539111 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07430-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Gene primer sequences and amplicon characteristics.
| Gene symbol | Gene name | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | Product length (bp) | Tm (°C) | E (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| F: GGTCAGGCTGGTGTTCAAAT | 173 | 60 | 102.77 | 0.996 |
| R: ACGATGACCACTCTGGGAAC | ||||||
|
|
| F: TTCGAGTGCATGAAGACCAG | 193 | 60 | 106.76 | 0.999 |
| R: TTGCGTTTACGGCTCTCTTT | ||||||
|
|
| F: CCAGGCATGGTAGTGACCTT | 184 | 60 | 98.05 | 0.997 |
| R: TTGGAGGGTTGTTTTTGGAG | ||||||
|
|
| F: TGATATTTGGGAAGGCAAGG | 201 | 60 | 103.28 | 0.993 |
| R: CGCCCAAGAGCGTAATAATC | ||||||
|
|
| F: GTTCCGATGTTTGTGTGTGG | 230 | 60 | 101.64 | 0.993 |
| R: TTCTGCAATCCCGATCTACC | ||||||
|
|
| F: GCTCGTGGTCCATTTCATTT | 240 | 60 | 103.71 | 0.998 |
| R: TCCCACTTCATGTGACAAGC | ||||||
|
|
| F: ATCCGTAAGCATTTGGAACG | 162 | 60 | 102.48 | 0.999 |
| R: AGCCACTAAGGCTGAAGCTG | ||||||
|
|
| F: GCCAATTCCTGTTCTTCCAA | 155 | 60 | 94.71 | 0.994 |
| R: CTCCGTGAACTGAAGCACAA | ||||||
|
|
| F: CCTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTTCT | 248 | 60 | 98.63 | 0.997 |
| R: CACCGATCCAGACGGAGTAT | ||||||
|
|
| F: GCCTTTTGAATGTGGATTTGA | 119 | 60 | 97.11 | 0.998 |
| R: TTGGGAATAAAAGGGTAATTTCT | ||||||
|
|
| F: TTTCTAGGATTATTCCCCTATATTTTT | 129 | 60 | 109.60 | 0.999 |
| R: GGCTAATATATGGGTTGTATTATTGAT | ||||||
|
|
| F: AAAATTTTTAAGAACACAATTCTACCC | 100 | 60 | 104.75 | 0.998 |
| R: AACAGGGCGAGCTCCAAT | ||||||
|
|
| F: TACCGGGGTTGTTCTAGCTG | 232 | 60 | 110.06 | 0.993 |
| R: AAAATGTTGGGGGAAAAAGG |
Tm: melting temperature; bp: base pairs; E: efficiency of primer; R 2: regression coefficient.
Figure 1Cycle threshold (Ct) values of the candidate RGs across the experimental samples. The line in the box indicates the median value. The box represents the values between the 25th and 75th percentiles. The maximum and minimum values are represented by up and low caps.
Ranking of RGs based on their expression stability across different developmental stages of C. ferrugineus according to geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and delta Ct method.
| Ranking | geNorm (M-value) | NormFinder (stability value) | BestKeeper (SD) | Delta Ct method (stability value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 | — |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
Figure 2Pairwise variation of RGs in C. ferrugineus, according to the geNorm algorithm. Line graphs show the average expression stability value (M) for (A) different developmental stages and (B) different strains of the insect. Bar graphs show the pairwise variation (V) of normalization factors (NFn and NFn+1) to estimate the optimal number of RGs for use in the analysis. The optimum number of RGs required for normalization (as predicted by the algorithm) is marked with an asterisk.
Ranking of RGs based on their expression stability in different strains according to geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and delta Ct algorithm methods.
| Ranking | geNorm (M-value) | NormFinder (stability value) | BestKeeper(stability value) | Delta Ct method (stability value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 | — |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
Sample collection information.
| Location and collection time | Site of collection | Susceptibility to phosphine | Sample category | Samples | Individual amount used for RNA extraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhangjiagang County of Jiangsu Province, China, in July, 2013 | farmer’s barns | Susceptible strain (SS) | Developmental stages | 1st-instar larvae | 70 |
| 4th-instar larvae | 25 | ||||
| pupae | 25 | ||||
| newly-emerged adults | 22 | ||||
| aged adults | 22 | ||||
| Duration of exposure to phosphine (h) | 0 (SS0) | 22 | |||
| 0.5 (SS0.5) | 22 | ||||
| 1 (SS1) | 22 | ||||
| 2 (SS2) | 22 | ||||
| 4 (SS4) | 22 | ||||
| 8 (SS8) | 22 | ||||
| 12 (SS12) | 22 | ||||
| 48 (SS48) | 22 | ||||
| Taicang County of Jiangsu Province, China, in July, 2013 | State Grain Reserve Depot | Resistant strain (RS) | Duration of exposure to phosphine (h) | 0 (RS0) | 22 |
| 0.5 (RS0.5) | 22 | ||||
| 1 (RS1) | 22 | ||||
| 2 (RS2) | 22 | ||||
| 4 (RS4) | 22 | ||||
| 8 (RS8) | 22 | ||||
| 12 (RS12) | 22 | ||||
| 48 (RS48) | 22 |
Figure 3Validation of the selected RGs in C. ferrugineus. Expression levels of the target gene (cox1) were tested using different normalization factors. The data represent mean values ± SD. Comparison of means is carried out using the Student’s t-test (P < 0.05). A double asterisk indicates significantly different values (P < 0.01).
Figure 4Relative expression of 4 mitochondrial genes according to the selected RGs (RPS13 + γ-TUB). (A) nad3, (B) atp6, (C) cob and (D) cox1 in sample sets across the phosphine-susceptible strain (SS) and phosphine-resistant strain (RS) under exposure to phosphine for 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 48 h, respectively. Bars indicate the standard deviation (±SD) evaluated from three biological replicates. The asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference compared with the control, by the Student’s t-test (SS0 and RS0 were the controls, respectively; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).