Literature DB >> 28765098

Vertebral body bone mineral density in patients with lumbar spondylolysis: a quantitative CT study.

Naciye Sinem Gezer1, Ali Balcı, Orhan Kalemci, Nevin Köremezli, Işıl Başara Akın, Koray Ur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spondylolysis is known to be a part of a disease process, which describes a defect in the pars interarticularis of vertebra. We aimed to use quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to measure vertebral body bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with lumbar spondylolysis and compare it with readings in controls.
METHODS: Forty symptomatic patients with lumbar spondylolysis aged 18-52 years and 40 matched controls of same sex and approximate age (±2 years) were included in the study. Measurements of BMD were performed by QCT analysis for each vertebral body from T12 to L5 and mean BMD was calculated for each case.
RESULTS: Of 40 patients, 22 (55%) demonstrated L5 spondylolysis, 14 (35%) L4 spondylolysis, three (7.5%) L3 spondylolysis, and one (2.5%) L2 spondylolysis. Spondylolisthesis was found in 29 patients (73%). Patients with spondylolisthesis were significantly older than patients without spondylolisthesis (42±6.9 vs. 37.2±5.4, P = 0.024). Mean BMD value of the patient group was significantly lower than that of the controls (105±24 mg/cm³ vs. 118.7±25.6 mg/cm³, P = 0.015). Subgroup analysis of 19 patients and 19 controls under the age of 40 revealed that the mean BMD value of the patients was significantly lower than that of the controls in the younger age group as well (108.7±23.5 mg/cm³ vs. 130±25.8 mg/cm³, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with spondylolysis had significantly lower mean vertebral body BMD compared with controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765098      PMCID: PMC5602365          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2017.16463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  23 in total

Review 1.  Bone mineral density and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  S M Knight; E F Ring; A K Bhalla
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Judith E Adams; Gabriele Armbrecht; Peter Augat; Cesar E Bogado; Mary L Bouxsein; Dieter Felsenberg; Masako Ito; Sven Prevrhal; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Correlation between bone mineral density and intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  A Harada; H Okuizumi; N Miyagi; E Genda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging.

Authors:  Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  H Saraste
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Histologic and morphometric observations on vertebral bone of aging sand rats.

Authors:  R Silberberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Phantom-less QCT BMD system as screening tool for osteoporosis without additional radiation.

Authors:  Dirk K Mueller; Alex Kutscherenko; Hans Bartel; Alain Vlassenbroek; Petr Ourednicek; Joachim Erckenbrecht
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Bone mineral density reference values in the normal female and male population of Izmir, Turkey.

Authors:  Metin Manisali; Dinç Ozaksoy; Erkan Yilmaz; Ozlem Senocak; Hasan Tatari; Onder Baran; Hasan Havitçioğlu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Diagnostic approach to osteoporosis and spondyloarthrosis in post-menopausal women by total body dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  R Nuti; G Righi; G Martini; V Turchetti; C Lepore; V Doretti
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1988 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 4.473

10.  Evaluation of MR Spectroscopy and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Postmenopausal Bone Strength.

Authors:  Kanhaiya Agrawal; Yatish Agarwal; Rajesh K Chopra; Achla Batra; Ranjan Chandra; Brij B Thukral
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-09-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative CT for Preoperative Assessment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: The Unique Impact of L4 Bone Mineral Density on Single-Level Disease.

Authors:  Roland Duculan; Alex M Fong; John A Carrino; Frank P Cammisa; Andrew A Sama; Alexander P Hughes; Darren R Lebl; James C Farmer; Russel C Huang; Harvinder S Sandhu; Carol A Mancuso; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  The effect of bone mineral density on development of Schmorl's nodes in young patients.

Authors:  Özlem Güngör; Naciye Sinem Gezer; Umut Özdamarlar; Ali Balcı
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  Characteristics of the DXA Measurements in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Analysis of Over 1000 Patients.

Authors:  Jie Bao; Da Zou; Weishi Li
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.458

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.