| Literature DB >> 28764792 |
Filbert Francis1, Deus S Ishengoma2, Bruno P Mmbando2, Acleus S M Rutta2, Mwelecele N Malecela3, Benjamin Mayala2,4, Martha M Lemnge2, Edwin Michael4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early detection of febrile illnesses at community level is essential for improved malaria case management and control. Currently, mobile phone-based technology has been commonly used to collect and transfer health information and services in different settings. This study assessed the applicability of mobile phone-based technology in real-time reporting of fever cases and management of malaria by village health workers (VHWs) in north-eastern Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-malarials; Artemether–lumefantrine; Drug resistance; Malaria; Mobile phone application; RDTs; Village health workers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28764792 PMCID: PMC5540449 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1956-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Map of Tanzania (a) showing the study villages (b) and the household locations (c)
Fig. 2Conceptual framework and information flow between different actors of the ComDSTM
Fig. 3A mobile phone window for registration and updating the household information, members’ registration and assessing household socio-economic status. Id identification number, SES socio-economic status, GPS geographical positioning system, lat latitude, long longitude
Fig. 4Panel of screen shots of mobile phone application interfaces for collection of active cases, passive cases and clinical diagnosis. a Active case collection, b clinic registration, c clinical diagnosis
Fig. 5Panel of screen shots of mobile phone application interfaces for capturing information on treatment, active follow-up for intake of anti-malarial and active follow-up at day 7. Id identification number, AL artemether–lumefantrine; a treatment form, b active follow-up form, c day 7 follow-up
Demographic characteristics of the study population at baseline
| Variable | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Population at baseline | 2934 |
| Gender | |
| Female | 1522 (51.9) |
| Male | 1412 (48.1) |
| Age–median (IQR) | 19.1 (8.1–40.1) |
| Tribe | |
| Bondei | 1620 (55.2) |
| Sambaa | 458 (15.6) |
| Zigua | 145 (4.9) |
| Mmakonde | 109 (3.7) |
| Muha | 49 (1.7) |
| Others | 553 (23.2) |
| Age groups in years | |
| <1 | 60 (2.0) |
| 1–4 | 315 (10.7) |
| 5–9 | 420 (14.3) |
| 10–14 | 383 (13.1) |
| 15–19 | 276 (9.4) |
| 20+ | 1480 (50.4) |
| Owned bed neta | |
| Not owned any bed net | 162 (26.3) |
| Owned at least 1 bed net | 453 (73.7) |
| Number of bed nets per householda | |
| 1 | 199 (43.9) |
| 2–3 | 225 (49.7) |
| 4–5 | 22 (4.5) |
| 5–12 | 7 (1.2) |
aNumber of households which responded = 615/678 (91.0%)
Fig. 6Proportion of fever cases recorded by village health workers during active and passive case detection
Proportion of fevers and malaria cases in the three study villages
| Variable | Number attended | Fevera
| Malaria by RDT | Malaria by microscopy | Cases of fever with malariab, c
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villages | |||||
| Mamboleo | 526 (29.6) | 151 (28.7) | 217 (41.3) | 202 (38.4) | 78 (51.7) |
| Magoda | 626 (35.2) | 251 (40.1) | 324 (51.8) | 299 (47.8) | 135 (53.8) |
| Mpapayu | 626 (35.2) | 183 (29.2) | 319 (51.0) | 297 (47.4) | 107 (58.5) |
| Test statistics, χ2 (p value) | 22.7 (p < 0.001) | 15.3 (p < 0.001) | 12.7 (0.02) | 1.7 (0.428) | |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 779 (45.0) | 283 (35.4) | 409 (51.2) | 377 (47.2) | 178 (61.5) |
| Female | 979 (55.0) | 297 (30.3) | 451 (46.1) | 421 (43.0) | 179 (60.3) |
| Test statistics, χ2 (p value) | 5.2 (0.023) | 4.6 (0.032) | 3.1 (0.07) | 0.08 (0.76) | |
| Age group | |||||
| <1 | 46 (2.6) | 32 (69.6) | 5 (10.9) | 5 (10.9) | 4 (12.5) |
| 1–4 | 263 (14.8) | 124 (47.2) | 102 (38.8) | 81 (30.8) | 51 (40.5) |
| 5–9 | 409 (23.0) | 180 (44.1) | 265 (64.8) | 240 (58.7) | 118 (68.2) |
| 10–14 | 355 (20.0) | 127 (35.8) | 217 (61.1) | 208 (58.6) | 87 (68.0) |
| 15–19 | 119 (6.7) | 28 (23.5) | 71 (59.7) | 68 (57.1) | 23 (82.1) |
| 20+ | 586 (33.0) | 89 (15.2) | 200 (34.0) | 196 (33.5) | 37 (41.1) |
| Test statistics, χ2 (p value) | 165 (<0.001) | 156 (<0.001) | 139.2 (<0.001) | 66.5 (<0.001) | |
aFever at presentation (axillary temperature 37.5 °C)
bDenominator were cases with fever at presentation
cMalaria parasites detected by microscopy
Multivariable logistic regression of risk factors associated with malaria among individuals of different age groups in the three villages
| Variable | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | p value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| <1 | 1.2 (0.4–3.5) | 0.736 | 1.1 (0.4–3.2) | 0.858 |
| 1–4 | 3.7 (2.4–5.7) | <0.001 | 3.6 (2.3–5.5) | <0.001 |
| 5–9 | 6.3 (4.4–9.2) | <0.001 | 6.2 (4.3–9.1) | <0.001 |
| 10–14 | 4.3 (2.9–6.3) | <0.001 | 4.2 (2.9–6.3) | <0.001 |
| 15–19 | 2.5 (1.4–4.5) | 0.001 | 2.5 (1.5–4.3) | 0.001 |
| 20+ | Reference | Reference | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Female | Reference | Reference | ||
| Male | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 0.058 | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 0.766 |
| Village | ||||
| Mamboleo | Reference | Reference | ||
| Magoda | 1.6 (1.2–2.1) | 0.001 | 1.5 (1.1–2.1) | 0.006 |
| Mpapayu | 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | 0.949 | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 0.844 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence intervals
Fig. 7Proportion of fever and monthly malaria cases detected by microscopy
Proportion of microscopic malaria cases and fever episodes by number of visits
| Visits | Number of cases attended | Malaria cases* | Fever† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | OR (95% CI) | n (%) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| 1 | 1012 | 410 (40.5) | 325 (32.1) | – | |
| 2 | 435 | 204 (46.5) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 150 (34.5) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) |
| 3 | 183 | 93 (50.8) | 1.5 (1.1–2.1) | 66 (36.1) | 1.2 (0.9–1. 7) |
| 4–10 | 148 | 91 (61.5) | 2.3 (1.6–2.3) | 39 (26.4) | 0.8 (0.5–1.1) |
| Overall | 1778 | 798 (44.9) | 580 (32.6) | ||
Fever: axillary temperature ≥37.5 °C
OR odds ratio, CI confidence intervals
* Test statistics (χ2 = 27.0, p < 0.001)
† χ2 = , 4.4, p = 0.218
Distribution of incidence of malaria by gender and age
| Variable | Person-years | Malaria cases | Incidence rate | IRR (CI 95%) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Female | 1412 | 415 | 293.9 | 1.09 (0.94–1.25) | 0.255 |
| Male | 1388 | 374 | 269 | Reference | |
| Age (years) | |||||
| <1 | 33 | 5 | 152 | 1.06 (0.44–2.59) | <0.001 |
| 1–4 | 285 | 80 | 280 | 1.97 (1.52–2.56) | <0.001 |
| 5–9 | 448 | 236 | 527 | 3.70 (3.06–4.45) | <0.001 |
| 10–14 | 400 | 205 | 511 | 3.59 (3.00–4.36) | <0.001 |
| 15–19 | 258 | 67 | 259 | 1.82 (1.38–2.40) | <0.001 |
| ≥20 | 1376 | 196 | 142 | Reference | – |
| Total | 2800 | 789 | 282 | – | – |
IRR incidence rate ratio