Literature DB >> 28763712

Crossover study of amputee stair ascent and descent biomechanics using Genium and C-Leg prostheses with comparison to non-amputee control.

Derek J Lura1, Matthew W Wernke2, Stephanie L Carey2, Jason T Kahle3, Rebecca M Miro2, M Jason Highsmith4.   

Abstract

This study was a randomized crossover of stair ambulation of Transfemoral Amputees (TFAs) using the Genium and C-Leg prosthetic knees. TFAs typically have difficulty ascending and descending stairs, limiting community mobility. The objective of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of the Genium and C-Leg prostheses for stair ascent and descent, and their absolute efficacy relative to non-amputees. Twenty TFAs, and five non-amputees participated in the study. TFAs were randomized to begin the study with the Genium or C-Leg prosthesis. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection and the study was listed on clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01473662). After fitting, accommodation, and training, participants were asked to demonstrate their preferred gait pattern for stair ascent and descent and a step-over-step pattern if able. TFAs then switched prosthetic legs and repeated fitting, accommodation, training, and testing. An eight camera Vicon optical motion analysis system, and two AMTI force plates were used to track and analyze the participants' gait patterns, knee flexion angles, knee moment normalized by body weight, and swing time. For stair descent, no significant differences were found between prostheses. For stair ascent, Genium use resulted in: increased ability to use a step-over-step gait pattern (p=0.03), increased prosthetic side peak knee flexion (p<0.01), and increased swing duration (p<0.01). Changes in contralateral side outcomes and in knee moment were not significant. Overall the Genium knee decreased deficiency in gait patterns for stair ascent relative to the C-Leg, by enabling gait patterns that more closely resembled non-amputees.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait; Rehabilitation; Stair climbing; Step over step (SOS); Step to gait (ST); Transfemoral amputees (TFAs)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28763712      PMCID: PMC5645229          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.07.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  11 in total

Review 1.  Psychometric properties of measurement tools for quantifying knee joint position and movement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pagamas Piriyaprasarth; Meg E Morris
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Laura L Willingham; Noelle C Buell; Katheryn J Allyn; Douglas G Smith
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Comparison of nonmicroprocessor knee mechanism versus C-Leg on Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, stumbles, falls, walking tests, stair descent, and knee preference.

Authors:  Jason T Kahle; M Jason Highsmith; Sandra L Hubbard
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

4.  Control of stair ascent and descent with a powered transfemoral prosthesis.

Authors:  Brian Edward Lawson; Huseyin Atakan Varol; Amanda Huff; Erdem Erdemir; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Functional capabilities of lower limb amputees.

Authors:  I C Narang; B P Mathur; P Singh; V S Jape
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Assessment of transfemoral amputees using C-Leg and Power Knee for ascending and descending inclines and steps.

Authors:  Erik J Wolf; Vanessa Q Everding; Alison L Linberg; Barri L Schnall; Joseph M Czerniecki; Jeffrey M Gambel
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Outcomes associated with the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees among individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew B Sawers; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

8.  EFFECTS OF THE GENIUM KNEE SYSTEM ON FUNCTIONAL LEVEL, STAIR AMBULATION, PERCEPTIVE AND ECONOMIC OUTCOMES IN TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTEES.

Authors:  M Jason Highsmith; Jason T Kahle; Matthew M Wernke; Stephanie L Carey; Rebecca M Miro; Derek J Lura; Bryce S Sutton
Journal:  Technol Innov       Date:  2016-09-01

9.  Does a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee affect stair ascent strategies in persons with transfemoral amputation?

Authors:  Jennifer M Aldridge Whitehead; Erik J Wolf; Charles R Scoville; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Physical performance and self-report outcomes associated with use of passive, adaptive, and active prosthetic knees in persons with unilateral, transfemoral amputation: Randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Robert L Askew
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2015
View more
  2 in total

1.  Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis with Adaptive Control Enables Climbing Stairs with Different Stair Heights, Cadences, and Gait Patterns.

Authors:  Sarah Hood; Lukas Gabert; Tommaso Lenzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Robot       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.835

2.  Stair Ascent Phase-Variable Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis.

Authors:  Ross J Cortino; Edgar Bolívar-Nieto; T Kevin Best; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom       Date:  2022-07-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.