Literature DB >> 26560243

Physical performance and self-report outcomes associated with use of passive, adaptive, and active prosthetic knees in persons with unilateral, transfemoral amputation: Randomized crossover trial.

Brian J Hafner, Robert L Askew.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Prosthetic knees are a vital component in an artificial limb. Contemporary knees include passive, (mechanical), adaptive (computerized), or active (motorized) control systems and have the potential to mitigate amputation-related functional impairments and activity limitations. A 14 mo randomized crossover trial was conducted. Participants (n = 12, mean age = 58 yr) were tested under three conditions: passive control (existing knee), adaptive control (Ossur Rheo Knee II), and active control (Ossur Power Knee II). Training and acclimation time were provided to participants in the adaptive and active knees. Outcome measures included indoor tests (Timed Up and Go test [TUG], stairs, and ramp), outdoor tests (walking course and perceived exertion), step activity monitor, self-report surveys (mobility, balance confidence, physical function, fatigue, and general health), and fall incidence. Mixed-effects linear regression modeling was used to evaluate data. Compared with passive control, adaptive control significantly improved comfortable TUG time (difference = 0.91 s, p = 0.001) and reported physical function (difference = 1.26 [T-score], p = 0.03). Active control significantly increased comfortable TUG, fast TUG, and ramp times (difference = 3.02, 2.66, and 0.96 s, respectively, all p < 0.03) and increased balance confidence (difference = 3.77, p = 0.003) compared with passive control. Findings suggest that adaptive knee control may enhance function compared with passive control but that active control can restrict mobility in middle-age or older users with transfemoral amputation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; "Use of Passive, Adaptive, and Active Prosthetic Knees in Persons With Unilateral, Transfemoral Amputation": NCT02219230; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02219230.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive control system; amputation; amputee; artificial limb; longitudinal studies; measurement; outcomes evaluation; physical performance testing; prosthetic knee; questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26560243     DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.09.0210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  14 in total

1.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  OASIS 1: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types.

Authors:  James H Campbell; Phillip M Stevens; Shane R Wurdeman
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2020-11-05

3.  Crossover study of amputee stair ascent and descent biomechanics using Genium and C-Leg prostheses with comparison to non-amputee control.

Authors:  Derek J Lura; Matthew W Wernke; Stephanie L Carey; Jason T Kahle; Rebecca M Miro; M Jason Highsmith
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation.

Authors:  Sara Agueda Fuenzalida Squella; Andreas Kannenberg; Ângelo Brandão Benetti
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alix Chadwell; Laura Diment; M Micó-Amigo; Dafne Z Morgado Ramírez; Alex Dickinson; Malcolm Granat; Laurence Kenney; Sisary Kheng; Mohammad Sobuh; Robert Ssekitoleko; Peter Worsley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Effects of extended powered knee prosthesis stance time via visual feedback on gait symmetry of individuals with unilateral amputation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Andrea Brandt; William Riddick; Jonathan Stallrich; Michael Lewek; He Helen Huang
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Control Framework for Sloped Walking With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis.

Authors:  Namita Anil Kumar; Shawanee Patrick; Woolim Hong; Pilwon Hur
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation.

Authors:  Steven Barr; Tracey E Howe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-23

9.  Relationship between Asymmetry of Gait and Muscle Torque in Patients after Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation.

Authors:  Alicja Rutkowska-Kucharska; Mateusz Kowal; Sławomir Winiarski
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 10.  Economic benefits of microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees: a modeling study.

Authors:  Christine Chen; Mark Hanson; Ritika Chaturvedi; Soeren Mattke; Richard Hillestad; Harry H Liu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.