Rebecca L Smith1, Lisa M Gallicchio2, Jodi A Flaws3. 1. Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. 2. Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 3. Department of Comparative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The mechanism underlying hot flashes is not well-understood, primarily because of complex relationships between and among hot flashes and their risk factors. METHODS: We explored those relationships using a Bayesian network approach based on a 2006 to 2015 cohort study of hot flashes among 776 female residents, 45 to 54 years old, in the Baltimore area. Bayesian networks were fit for each outcome (current hot flashes, hot flashes before the end of the study, hot flash severity, hot flash frequency, and age at first hot flashes) separately and together with a list of risk factors (estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, body mass index and obesity, race, income level, education level, smoking history, drinking history, and activity level). Each fitting was conducted separately on all women and only perimenopausal women, at enrollment and 4 years after enrollment. RESULTS: Hormone levels, almost always interrelated, were the most common variable linked to hot flashes; hormone levels were sometimes related to body mass index, but were not directly related to any other risk factors. Smoking was also frequently associated with increased likelihood of severe symptoms, but not through an antiestrogenic pathway. The age at first hot flashes was related only to race. All other factors were either not related to outcomes or were mediated entirely by race, hormone levels, or smoking. CONCLUSIONS: These models can serve as a guide for design of studies into the causal network underlying hot flashes.
OBJECTIVE: The mechanism underlying hot flashes is not well-understood, primarily because of complex relationships between and among hot flashes and their risk factors. METHODS: We explored those relationships using a Bayesian network approach based on a 2006 to 2015 cohort study of hot flashes among 776 female residents, 45 to 54 years old, in the Baltimore area. Bayesian networks were fit for each outcome (current hot flashes, hot flashes before the end of the study, hot flash severity, hot flash frequency, and age at first hot flashes) separately and together with a list of risk factors (estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, body mass index and obesity, race, income level, education level, smoking history, drinking history, and activity level). Each fitting was conducted separately on all women and only perimenopausal women, at enrollment and 4 years after enrollment. RESULTS: Hormone levels, almost always interrelated, were the most common variable linked to hot flashes; hormone levels were sometimes related to body mass index, but were not directly related to any other risk factors. Smoking was also frequently associated with increased likelihood of severe symptoms, but not through an antiestrogenic pathway. The age at first hot flashes was related only to race. All other factors were either not related to outcomes or were mediated entirely by race, hormone levels, or smoking. CONCLUSIONS: These models can serve as a guide for design of studies into the causal network underlying hot flashes.
Authors: Pauline M Maki; Ellen W Freeman; Gail A Greendale; Victor W Henderson; Paul A Newhouse; Peter J Schmidt; Nelda F Scott; Carol A Shively; Claudio N Soares Journal: Menopause Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Ellen B Gold; Alicia Colvin; Nancy Avis; Joyce Bromberger; Gail A Greendale; Lynda Powell; Barbara Sternfeld; Karen Matthews Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Susan R Miller; Lisa M Gallicchio; Lynn M Lewis; Janice K Babus; Patricia Langenberg; Howard A Zacur; Jodi A Flaws Journal: Maturitas Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Catheryne Chiang; Lisa Gallicchio; Howard Zacur; Sue Miller; Jodi A Flaws; Rebecca L Smith Journal: Maturitas Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Genoa R Warner; Diana C Pacyga; Rita S Strakovsky; Rebecca Smith; Tamarra James-Todd; Paige L Williams; Russ Hauser; Daryl D Meling; Zhong Li; Jodi A Flaws Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: Ann M Moyer; Mariza de Andrade; Stephanie S Faubion; Ekta Kapoor; Tanda Dudenkov; Richard M Weinshilboum; Virginia M Miller Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.953