| Literature DB >> 28763042 |
Huihui Guo1, Aohui Guo2, Yang Gao3, Tingting Liu4.
Abstract
Film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) are widely applied in mass bio-sensing and pressure sensors, owing to their extreme sensitivity and integration ability, and ability to miniaturize circuits. A volatile organic compound (VOC) sensor with a polymer-coated diaphragm, using FBARs as a strain sensing element is proposed and optimized. This vapor sensor is based on organic vapor-induced changes of mechanical deformation of the micro-diaphragm. The four FBARs are located at the edge of the bi-layer diaphragm comprising silicon nitride and silicon oxide for strain extraction. In this work, the strain distribution of the FBAR area under vapor loads is obtained using the finite element analysis (FEA) and the response frequency changes of the FBARs under vapor loads are obtained based on both the first-principle methods to deduce the elastic coefficient variation of aluminum nitride film in FBARs under the bending stresses and the Mason equivalent circuit model of the sensor using ADS software. Finally, optimizations are performed on both the bilayered diaphragm structure and sensing film. The diaphragm with a 0.7 μm silicon nitride layer and a 0.5 μm silicon oxide layer are considered to be the optimized design. The optimal coverage area of the sensing film for the diaphragm is around 0.8.Entities:
Keywords: FBAR; FEA; VOC sensor; bilayered diaphragm
Year: 2017 PMID: 28763042 PMCID: PMC5580034 DOI: 10.3390/s17081764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic of the volatile organic compound (VOC) sensor: (a) Cross section view; (b) Drawing of the working principle.
Material and structure parameters of the FBAR.
| Material | Density (g/cm3) | Dielectric Loss (dB/m) | Acoustic Impedance (kg/m2 s) | Longitudinal Acoustic Wave Velocityy (m/s) | Film Thickness (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 2.3 | - | 1.25 × 107 | 6253 | 0.5 |
| Si3N4 | 3.25 | - | 3.6 × 107 | 11,000 | 0.7 |
| Pt | 21.45 | - | 6.0 × 107 | 2789 | 0.1 |
| AlN | 3.2 | 800 | 3.7 × 107 | 10,984.57 | 1 |
| Al | 2.7 | 7500 | 1.76 × 107 | 6526 | 0.9 |
Figure 2The resonant frequency of the film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR) with different silicon nitride layers.
Figure 3The impedance characteristic curve of the 5-layer FBAR with an optimal support layer.
Material and structure parameters of the sensor modeling.
| Material | Elastic Modulus (G Pa) | Poisson Ratio (μ) | Density (g/cm3) | Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (10−6/°C) | Film Thickness (μm) | Film Radius (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 2.3 | 0.17 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 300 |
| Si3N4 | 3.25 | 0.28 | 3.25 | 2.35 | 0.7 | 300 |
| PDMS | 0.007 | 0.48 | 0.96 | 300 | 20 | 240 |
PDMS—Polydimethylsiloxane.
Figure 4The strain distribution of the FBAR area with different coverage areas of sensing film under the same load: (a) χ = 0.25; (b) χ = 0.36; (c) χ = 0.64 (d) χ = 0.81.
Figure 5The average strain of the FBAR area with different coverage areas of sensing film under the same load.
Figure 6The change of longitudinal acoustic wave velocity in AlN under different vapor loads.
Figure 7The resonant frequency change curve of the sensor for chloroform vapor.