| Literature DB >> 28761158 |
G Martinez1, B A Piot1, M Hakl1, M Potemski1, Y S Hor2, A Materna3, S G Strzelecka3, A Hruban3,4, O Caha5, J Novák5, A Dubroka5, Č Drašar6, M Orlita7,8.
Abstract
Despite intensive investigations of Bi2Se3 in past few years, the size and nature of the bulk energy band gap of this well-known 3D topological insulator still remain unclear. Here we report on a combined magneto-transport, photoluminescence and infrared transmission study of Bi2Se3, which unambiguously shows that the energy band gap of this material is direct and reaches E g = (220 ± 5) meV at low temperatures.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28761158 PMCID: PMC5537234 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07211-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1XRD symmetric scan collected from a Bi2Se3 sample. Blue lines denote theoretical positions of the diffraction peaks according to the structural database[15].
Figure 2(a,b) Low-temperature PL spectra collected from samples A and B, respectively. The dashed vertical lines denote the estimated energy of the band gap, see the discussion in the main text. The schematic band structure of Bi2Se3 is plotted in the inset of the part (a), the difference between E and corresponds to the Moss-Burstein shift. (c,d): Infrared transmission data T and T taken on samples A and B, respectively. The corresponding absorbance spectra, −ln(T)/d, around the interband absorption edge , normalized by the sample thickness, are plotted in the insets. The pronounced modulation of the transmission spectra is due to Fabry-Pérot oscillations, which show rather high crystalline quality of the studied Bi2Se3 bulk samples and which allows us to estimate, knowing the thickness of the samples, the refraction index: n ≈ 5.5–6.
Figure 3(a,b) Magneto-resistance data on samples A and B taken at the temperature of T = 4.2 and 1.4 K, respectively. The upper and lower insets show background-removed data ΔR and fast Fourier transform of ΔR (B −1), respectively. The latter imply the oscillation frequencies F = 22.0 ± 0.5 T and F = 28.0 ± 0.5 T for the samples A and B, respectively.