Literature DB >> 28760758

Persistent effect of sex ratios on relationship quality and life satisfaction.

Pauline Grosjean1, Robert C Brooks2.   

Abstract

Convict transportation to Australia imposed heavily male-biased sex ratios in some areas, altering the convict-era mating market and generating long-running cultural effects that persist to the present day. We test whether convict-era sex ratios have altered marital and overall life satisfaction today, through their persistent effects on gender norms and household bargaining. We find that both women and men are happier, and the happiness gap within married couples is smaller in areas where convict-era sex ratios were heavily male-biased than in areas where sex ratios were historically more even. We discuss our results in light of household bargaining theory, evolutionary sexual conflict theory and the well-documented relationship between conservative attitudes and self-reported happiness.This article is part of the themed issue 'Adult sex ratios and reproductive decisions: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  bargaining; dyadic power; happiness; mating market

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760758      PMCID: PMC5540857          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  14 in total

1.  Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution.

Authors:  Y Weiss; R J Willis
Journal:  J Labor Econ       Date:  1997-01

2.  Why are conservatives happier than liberals?

Authors:  Jaime L Napier; John T Jost
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-06

3.  Conservatives report, but liberals display, greater happiness.

Authors:  Sean P Wojcik; Arpine Hovasapian; Jesse Graham; Matt Motyl; Peter H Ditto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Adult sex ratios and partner scarcity among hunter-gatherers: implications for dispersal patterns and the evolution of human sociality.

Authors:  Karen L Kramer; Ryan Schacht; Adrian Bell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health.

Authors:  Robin W Simon
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2002-01

6.  Becoming married, depression, and alcohol problems among young adults.

Authors:  A V Horwitz; H R White
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1991-09

7.  Adult sex ratio and social status predict mating and parenting strategies in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  Caroline Uggla; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Sex ratio effects on reproductive strategies in humans.

Authors:  Ryan Schacht; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Patterns of Family Formation in Response to Sex Ratio Variation.

Authors:  Ryan Schacht; Karen L Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High sex ratios in rural China: declining well-being with age in never-married men.

Authors:  Xudong Zhou; Therese Hesketh
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  3 in total

1.  Adult sex ratios and reproductive strategies: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies.

Authors:  Ryan Schacht; Karen L Kramer; Tamás Székely; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Parental investment in Tibetan populations does not reflect stated cultural norms.

Authors:  Juan Du; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  High sex ratios in rural China: declining well-being with age in never-married men.

Authors:  Xudong Zhou; Therese Hesketh
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.