| Literature DB >> 29622933 |
Abstract
In this paper, we examined both stated norms of sex preference and actual sex-biases in parental investment in a Tibetan pastoralist society. We collected detailed demographic data on infant mortality, infant feeding, the length of interbirth intervals, and a decision when giving gifts, to examine sex-biased parental investment. Our results indicate a mismatch between self-reported son preference and measures of actual parental investment that favor daughters. We interpret this female-biased parental investment as a possible response to daughters generating more economic resources. However, the stated sex preferences of both sexes reflect cultural norms that appear to have remained unchanged over a long period, which may reflect the importance of male roles in the past. Our behavioral measures of parental investment are those most likely to be in the control of women (such as breastfeeding and interbirth interval), so this mismatch between stated and actual investment may be especially true of women.Entities:
Keywords: inheritance system; mismatch; pastoralist; sex-preference; social norms
Year: 2017 PMID: 29622933 PMCID: PMC5873243 DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arx134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Ecol ISSN: 1045-2249 Impact factor: 2.671
Figure 1Timeline of the major political changes in the local area from 1950s until 2015 (see SI for details).
Figure 4(a) Survival of breastfeeding for children who have been breast fed before 12 months (b) Onset of bottle feeding (shown as the survival rate of exclusive breastfeeding) over 12 months. Sample only includes women who gave birth after 1990 (N = 167). The survival curve indicates the likelihood of (a) still being breast fed and (b) starting to be bottle fed by mother before 12 months and 12 months respectively, for male and female children separately. The time was recorded based on days. The shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals. The blue bands and dashed lines represent male children; the red bands and solid lines represent female children.
Figure 3Mortality rate of children (a) before age 5 (b) across different time period. sample includes N = 1448 female’s birth history (N = 2456 children). Shaded bands indicate 95% confidence intervals. Blue dashed line and shaded band represent survival of male children, red solid line and shaded band represents survival of female children.
Figure 2Self-report of offspring sex-preference in 4 different time periods (N = 330 males and N = 367 females). The white bar indicates a stated preference for a daughter; the black bar indicates a stated preference for a son.
Mixed-effects Cox model of mortality risk before age 5 (dead = 1, alive = 0)
| Variables | HR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Fixed effects | ||
|
|
|
|
| Mother age of giving birth | 0.24 (0.13, 0.46) | <0.001*** |
| Children birth year(ref<1980) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.25 (0.82, 1.89) | 0.29 |
|
| 0.98 (0.64, 1.48) | 0.91 |
| Yak | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 0.81 |
| sex order (ref: 1st sex) | ||
|
| 1.01 (0.78, 1.32) | 0.92 |
|
| 1.16 (0.84, 1.59) | 0.37 |
|
|
|
|
| Random effects | Variance (SD) | |
| Mother ID | 0.759 (0.86) |
N = 2456 children (N = 1293 male, N = 1163 female) are included in the dataset. Statistical significance indicates in bold, HR stands for Hazards Ratio, 95% CI indicates 95% Confidence intervals.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 5(a) Interbirth intervals across different time periods in 2 sex groups. The red solid line represents interbirth intervals after a female child; the blue dashed line represents interbirth intervals after a male child. The shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals. (b) The survival function of the birth intervals for mothers after having a son (blue line) and after a daughter (red solid line) over the whole dataset.
The effects of sex and different time period on the length of the interbirth intervals by using Cox regression
| Variables | HR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Sex (ref: Daughter) | ||
|
|
|
|
| Mother’s age of giving birth | 0.97 (0.95–0.99) | <0.001*** |
| Children birth year (ref:<1980) | ||
|
| 1.42 (1.11–1.81) | 0.01** |
|
| 1.69 (1.36–2.09) | <0.001*** |
|
| 2.44 (1.99–3.00) | <0.001*** |
| Yak | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.79 |
| Sex order (ref: 1st sex) | ||
|
| 0.48 (0.40–0.59) | <0.001*** |
| Son × Yak | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.89 |
HR stands for Hazard Ratio, 95% CI indicates 95% confidence intervals.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
The patterns of giving gifts to direct kin by adult male and female herders
| Male giver | Female giver | Chi square |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Father | 33 | 19 | 12.14 | <0.001 |
| Mother | 13 | 33 | ||
|
| ||||
Results of 2 × 2 Chi-square test indicate statistical difference between male and female givers preferentially giving to same sex kin. The results are divided into gifts to parents, siblings and children.