Literature DB >> 28759162

Nurses' Perceived Barriers to Bedside Handover and Their Implication for Clinical Practice.

Georgia Tobiano1, Jennifer A Whitty2, Tracey Bucknall3, Wendy Chaboyer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Bedside handover during the change of shift allows nurses to visualize patients and facilitate patient participation, both purported to improve patient safety. But, bedside handover does not always occur and when it does, it may not involve the patient. AIM: To explore and understand barriers nurses perceive in undertaking bedside handover.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 200 nurses working on medical wards, recruited from two Australian hospitals, one private and one public. As part of the survey, there was one open-ended question asking about perceived barriers to bedside handover. Content analysis was used to analyze data. Barriers were assessed using a determinant framework.
RESULTS: The open-ended question was answered by 176 (88%) participants. Three categories were identified. First, censoring the message showed nurses were concerned about patients and third-parties hearing sensitive information. In the second category, disrupting the communication flow, nurses perceived patients, family members, other nurses and external sources, interrupted the flow of handover and increased its duration. Finally, inhibiting characteristics demonstrated that individual patient and nurse views or capabilities hindered bedside handover. Barriers to bedside handover were determined to relate to individual nurse factors, patient factors, social, political and legal factors, and guideline factors. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Suggestions for enhancing bedside handover include debunking nurses' misconceptions, reflecting on nurses' viewpoints, using active educational approaches, and promotion of legal requirements to heighten nurses' confidence dealing with sensitive information. Regular patient rounding, and standardized handover may enable patient involvement in handover. Finally, reviewing the local context to ensure organizational processes support bedside handover is recommended.
© 2017 Sigma Theta Tau International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bedside handoff; bedside handover; communication; confidentiality; nurse perceptions; nursing; patient participation; patient safety; patient-centered care; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28759162     DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  6 in total

1.  Is privacy a problem during bedside handovers? A practice-oriented discussion paper.

Authors:  Simon Malfait; Ann Van Hecke; Wim Van Biesen; Kristof Eeckloo
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.874

2.  Using a knowledge translation framework to identify barriers and supports to effective nursing handover: A focus group study.

Authors:  Adriana Hada; Leanne Jack; Fiona Coyer
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-06-20

3.  Evidence-based practice: Knowledge, attitudes, implementation, facilitators, and barriers among community nurses-systematic review.

Authors:  Shu Li; Meijuan Cao; Xuejiao Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Bedside shift report: Nurses opinions based on their experiences.

Authors:  Joseph Jimmerson; Patricia Wright; Patricia A Cowan; Tammy King-Jones; Claudia J Beverly; Geoffrey Curran
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-12-30

5.  Improving patient-centred care through a tailored intervention addressing nursing clinical handover communication in its organizational and cultural context.

Authors:  Laura J Chien; Diana Slade; Maria R Dahm; Bernadette Brady; Elizabeth Roberts; Liza Goncharov; Joanne Taylor; Suzanne Eggins; Anna Thornton
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.057

6.  Developing theory-informed knowledge translation strategies to facilitate the use of patient-reported outcome measures in interdisciplinary low back pain clinical practices in Quebec: mixed methods study.

Authors:  Owis Eilayyan; Regina Visca; Diana Zidarov; Patrick Ware; André Bussières; Sara Ahmed
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.