Literature DB >> 28758776

Cognitive and contextual correlates of spontaneous and deliberate mind-wandering.

Matthew K Robison1, Nash Unsworth1.   

Abstract

Individuals with greater cognitive abilities generally show reduced rates of mind-wandering when completing relatively demanding tasks (Randall, Oswald, & Beier, 2014). However, it is yet unclear whether elevated rates of mind-wandering among low-ability individuals are manifestations of deliberate, intentional episodes of mind-wandering because of task disengagement or lack of motivation, or to spontaneous, unintentional failures to maintain task-oriented attention. The present study examined this issue by measuring working memory capacity (WMC), mind-wandering during 3 relatively demanding attention control tasks, and contextual variables (e.g., motivation, alertness, perceptions of task unpleasantness). Results indicated that the relationship between WMC and mind-wandering was primarily driven by spontaneous episodes. Lack of alertness also uniquely predicted more frequent spontaneous mind-wandering independently of WMC. Deliberate mind-wandering was primarily driven by a lack of motivation. Thus, cognitive and contextual factors can have distinct relationships with spontaneous and deliberate mind-wandering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28758776     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

1.  Testing the attention-distractibility trait.

Authors:  Matt E Meier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-11

Review 2.  Reconceptualizing mind wandering from a switching perspective.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Wong; Adrian R Willoughby; Liana Machado
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  A "Goldilocks zone" for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement.

Authors:  Matthew S Welhaf; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-05

4.  Effort Mobilization and Lapses of Sustained Attention.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Ashley L Miller; Shadee Aghel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality.

Authors:  Jonathan B Banks; Matthew S Welhaf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-31

6.  The influence of working memory capacity and lapses of attention for variation in error monitoring.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Ashley L Miller; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and the regulation of arousal.

Authors:  Matthew K Robison; Gene A Brewer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Re-examining the effect of motivation on intentional and unintentional task-unrelated thought: accounting for thought constraint produces novel results.

Authors:  Alyssa C Smith; Nicholaus P Brosowsky; Brandon C W Ralph; Daniel Smilek; Paul Seli
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-02-25

9.  Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-09

10.  Facing up to the wandering mind: Patterns of off-task laboratory thought are associated with stronger neural recruitment of right fusiform cortex while processing facial stimuli.

Authors:  Nerissa Siu Ping Ho; Giulia Poerio; Delali Konu; Adam Turnbull; Mladen Sormaz; Robert Leech; Boris Bernhardt; Elizabeth Jefferies; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.