Literature DB >> 28756472

Totally implantable venous access ports: a prospective long-term study of early and late complications in adult patients with cancer.

Eric Voog1, Loïc Campion2,3, Pauline du Rusquec2, Hugues Bourgeois4, Julien Domont4, Fabrice Denis4, Eric Emmanuel4, Olivier Dupuis4, Gérard Ganem4, Cedrik Lafont4, Katell Le Du4, Elena Pavluc4, Yohan Pointreau4, Sophie Roche4, Laurence Juhel-Voog4, Marie Zinger4, Philippe Solal-Celigny4,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP) have been widely used for many years in the management of patients suffering from cancer. The implantation and long-term use of TIVAPs are associated with mechanical, thrombotic, and infectious complications. This is the first exhaustive prospective study of all complications occurring in a whole population on long-term follow-up and therefore allows an objective assessment to be made of the safety of TIVAPs.
METHODS: We carried out a prospective single-center observational study. All adult patients with cancer who had a TIVAP implanted between January 1 and December 31, 2006 were registered. Early and late complications were recorded until the removal of the device, the patient's death, or until December 31, 2013. Exhaustive data concerning patients and TIVAP was recorded at time of implantation.
RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-three TIVAPs were implanted in 483 adult cancer patients and were followed during a period from 1 to 94 months (median = 18 months) representing a global quantity of 367,359 catheter-days. Eighty-seven complications were recorded (0.237/1000 catheter-days), including 37 infections (0.101/1000 catheter-days), 17 thrombotic events (0.046/1000 catheter-days), and 9 extravasations. Out of the 87 events, 62 (71.3%) occurred during the first year after implantation. Events were therefore extremely rare after 1 year. Thromboembolic and infectious complications were rare and no risk factors for these were found.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates excellent tolerability, with only occasional complications. Most of these occurred during the year following implantation. A TIVAP may also be left in place for an extremely long time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer chemotherapy; Complications; Infections; Long-term follow-up; Thromboses; Totally implantable venous access port

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28756472     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3816-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  22 in total

1.  Risk factors for central venous catheter thrombotic complications in children and adolescents with cancer.

Authors:  S Revel-Vilk; J Yacobovich; H Tamary; G Goldstein; S Nemet; M Weintraub; O Paltiel; G Kenet
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Complications associated with the use of Port-a-Caths in patients with malignant or haematological disease: a single-centre prospective analysis.

Authors:  C Heibl; V Trommet; S Burgstaller; B Mayrbaeurl; C Baldinger; R Koplmüller; T Kühr; L Wimmer; J Thaler
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.520

3.  Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches.

Authors:  J I Sznajder; F R Zveibil; H Bitterman; P Weiner; S Bursztein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-02

4.  Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan.

Authors:  R D Hull; J Hirsh; C J Carter; R M Jay; P E Dodd; P A Ockelford; G Coates; G J Gill; A G Turpie; D J Doyle; H R Buller; G E Raskob
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Totally implantable ports connected to valved catheters for chemotherapy: experience from 350 Groshong devices.

Authors:  Kenji Nishinari; Nelson Wolosker; Christiano Vinicius Bernardi; Guilherme Yazbek
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.283

6.  Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  R Biffi; F Orsi; S Pozzi; U Pace; G Bonomo; L Monfardini; P Della Vigna; N Rotmensz; D Radice; M G Zampino; N Fazio; F de Braud; B Andreoni; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients.

Authors:  Melina Verso; Giancarlo Agnelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer.

Authors:  J S Groeger; A B Lucas; H T Thaler; H Friedlander-Klar; A E Brown; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Evaluation of infectious complications of the implantable venous access system in a general oncologic population.

Authors:  Lilu Chang; Jir-Shiong Tsai; Shin-Ju Huang; Chiang-Ching Shih
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.918

10.  Risk factors for upper limb deep vein thrombosis associated with the use of central vein catheter in cancer patients.

Authors:  Melina Verso; Giancarlo Agnelli; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Walter Ageno; Mario Bazzan; Antonio Lazzaro; Francesco Paoletti; Maurizio Paciaroni; Stefano Mosca; Sergio Bertoglio
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.397

View more
  11 in total

1.  Hepatic vein migration of a totally implantable venous access port-a-cath for chemotherapy in a breast carcinoma patient: case report.

Authors:  Augusto Cesar Maia Rio Lima Silveira; Paula Shelda Fonseca Fernandes; Danilo Rafael da Silva Fontinele; Rafael Everton Assunção Ribeiro da Costa; José Eduardo Prado Araújo; Wilson de Oliveira Sousa; Sabas Carlos Vieira
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Surgical Removal of a Calcified Right Atrial Mass Related to Venous Access Port: A Case Report.

Authors:  Joseph G Brungardt; Anup K Kasi; Jeffrey B Kramer
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-31

3.  Cephalic vein approach for the implantable central venous access: A retrospective review of the single institution's experiences; Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jiyoung Rhu; Kang Woong Jun; Byung Joo Song; Kiyoung Sung; Jinbeom Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Management of outpatient with totally implantable venous access Ports during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Weipeng Yan; Chaoya Zhang; Chenggang Luo; Zilin Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Complications from port-a-cath system implantation in adults with malignant tumors: A 10-year single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Yong Li; Jianxi Guo; Yanfang Zhang; Jian Kong
Journal:  J Interv Med       Date:  2021-12-09

6.  A retrospective observational study on maintenance and complications of totally implantable venous access ports in 563 patients: Prolonged versus short flushing intervals.

Authors:  Yuejiao Zhang; Ruiyi Zhao; Nan Jiang; Yun Shi; Qianmi Wang; Ye Sheng
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2021-06-04

7.  Use of a hydrophilic coating wire reduces significantly the rate of central vein punctures and the incidence of pneumothorax in totally implantable access port (TIAP) surgery.

Authors:  Georgios Polychronidis; Roland Hennes; Cosima Engerer; Phillip Knebel; Daniel Schultze; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Lars Fischer
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Utility of totally implantable venous access ports in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Jun Du; Changsheng Fan; Xueli Mo; Jie Dong; Zhenhua Fan; Qikang Zhao
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  A Five-Year Data Report of Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Focusing on Early Complications.

Authors:  Harald Lenz; Kirsti Myre; Tomas Draegni; Elizabeth Dorph
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-10

10.  Comparison between ultrasound-guided TIVAD via the right innominate vein and the right internal jugular vein approach.

Authors:  Xingwei Sun; Xuming Bai; Jiaofeng Shen; Ziyang Yu; Zhixiang Zhuang; Yong Jin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.