Literature DB >> 28756400

Perspectives of survivors, families and researchers on key outcomes for research in acute respiratory failure.

Victor D Dinglas1,2, Caroline M Chessare1,2, Wesley E Davis1, Ann Parker1,2, Lisa Aronson Friedman1,2, Elizabeth Colantuoni1,3, Clifton O Bingham4,5,6, Alison E Turnbull1,2,7, Dale M Needham1,2,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is heterogeneity among the outcomes evaluated in studies of survivors of acute respiratory failure (ARF). AIM: To evaluate the importance of specific outcome domains to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) survivors, their family members and clinical researchers.
METHODS: Nineteen outcome domains were identified from the National Institutes of Health's Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health; Society of Critical Care Medicine's Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS); as well as patient, clinician and researcher input. We surveyed ARDS survivors, family members and critical care researchers, 279 respondents in total, using a 5-point scale (strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree and strongly agree) to rate the importance of measuring each domain in studies of ARF survivors' postdischarge outcomes.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At least 80% of patients and family members supported (ie, rated 'agree' or 'strongly agree') that 15 of the 19 domains should be measured in all future studies. Among researchers, 6 of 19 domains were supported, with researchers less supportive for all domains, except survival (95% vs 72% support). Overall, four domains were supported by all groups: physical function, cognitive function, return to work or prior activities and mental health.
CONCLUSION: Patient, family and researcher groups supported inclusion of outcome domains that fit within the PICS framework. Patients and family members also supported many additional domains, emphasising the importance of including patients/family, along with researchers, in consensus processes to select core outcome domains for future research studies. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult; follow-up studies; intensive care; patient outcome assessment; patient-centered outcomes research; respiratory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28756400      PMCID: PMC7430927          DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  44 in total

1.  Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Jean Carlet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Finlay A McAlister
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference.

Authors:  Dale M Needham; Judy Davidson; Henry Cohen; Ramona O Hopkins; Craig Weinert; Hannah Wunsch; Christine Zawistowski; Anita Bemis-Dougherty; Susan C Berney; O Joseph Bienvenu; Susan L Brady; Martin B Brodsky; Linda Denehy; Doug Elliott; Carl Flatley; Andrea L Harabin; Christina Jones; Deborah Louis; Wendy Meltzer; Sean R Muldoon; Jeffrey B Palmer; Christiane Perme; Marla Robinson; David M Schmidt; Elizabeth Scruth; Gayle R Spill; C Porter Storey; Marta Render; John Votto; Maurene A Harvey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Interpreting and comparing risks in the presence of competing events.

Authors:  Martin Wolkewitz; Ben S Cooper; Marc J M Bonten; Adrian G Barnett; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-08-21

5.  Choosing Important Health Outcomes For Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  E Gargon; B Gurung; N Medley; D Altman; J Blazeby; M Clarke; P Williamson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Difference in reported pre-morbid health-related quality of life between ARDS survivors and their substitute decision makers.

Authors:  Damon C Scales; Catherine M Tansey; Andrea Matte; Margaret S Herridge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Two perspectives of proxy reporting of health-related quality of life using the Euroqol-5D, an investigation of agreement.

Authors:  Steven McPhail; Elaine Beller; Terry Haines
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Psychiatric Symptoms in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors: A 1-Year National Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Minxuan Huang; Ann M Parker; O Joseph Bienvenu; Victor D Dinglas; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Ramona O Hopkins; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Progress on core outcome sets for critical care research.

Authors:  Bronagh Blackwood; John Marshall; Louise Rose
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.687

10.  An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.

Authors:  Shannon S Carson; Christopher H Goss; Sanjay R Patel; Antonio Anzueto; David H Au; Stuart Elborn; Joe K Gerald; Lynn B Gerald; Jeremy M Kahn; Atul Malhotra; Richard A Mularski; Kristin A Riekert; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Terri E Weaver; Jerry A Krishnan
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  21 in total

1.  Mechanical Ventilation Survivorship: A Tale of Two Countries.

Authors:  Rachel Kohn; Meeta Prasad Kerlin
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-04

2.  Critical illness, disability, and the road home.

Authors:  Linda Denehy; Catherine L Hough
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A 5-point strategy for improved connection with relatives of critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Nancy Kentish-Barnes
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 4.  Novel approaches to metabolic assessment and structured exercise to promote recovery in ICU survivors.

Authors:  Jeroen Molinger; Amy M Pastva; John Whittle; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.687

5.  Feasibility of Extracting Meaningful Patient Centered Outcomes From the Electronic Health Record Following Critical Illness in the Elderly.

Authors:  Sumera R Ahmad; Alex D Tarabochia; Luann Budahn; Allison M Lemahieu; Brenda Anderson; Kirtivardhan Vashistha; Lioudmila Karnatovskaia; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-06

6.  Putting measurement on a diet: development of a core set of indicators for quality improvement in the ICU using a Delphi method.

Authors:  Marieke Zegers; Rutger Verhage; Gijs Hesselink; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 7.  Outcomes of critical illness: what is meaningful?

Authors:  Ognjen Gajic; Sumera R Ahmad; Michael E Wilson; David A Kaufman
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 8.  Core outcomes sets for studies evaluating critical illness and patient recovery.

Authors:  Victor D Dinglas; Sai P S Cherukuri; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 9.  Measuring Outcomes After Critical Illness.

Authors:  Nathan E Brummel
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Survivors: Evidence of a Sustained Exercise Intolerance and Hypermetabolism.

Authors:  Maurice Joris; Pauline Minguet; Camille Colson; Jean Joris; Marjorie Fadeur; Gregory Minguet; Julien Guiot; Benoit Misset; Anne-Françoise Rousseau
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.