Bronagh Blackwood1, John Marshall, Louise Rose. 1. aCentre for Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland bLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto cDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre dLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto eProvincial Centre of Weaning Excellence, Toronto East General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Appropriate selection and definition of outcome measures are essential for clinical trials to be maximally informative. Core outcome sets (an agreed, standardized collection of outcomes measured and reported in all trials for a specific clinical area) were developed due to established inconsistencies in trial outcome selection. This review discusses the rationale for, and methods of, core outcome set development, as well as current initiatives in critical care. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent systematic reviews of reported outcomes and measurement instruments relevant to the critically ill highlight inconsistencies in outcome selection, definition, and measurement, thus establishing the need for core outcome sets. Current critical care initiatives include development of core outcome sets for trials aimed at reducing mechanical ventilation duration; rehabilitation following critical illness; long-term outcomes in acute respiratory failure; and epidemic and pandemic studies of severe acute respiratory infection. SUMMARY: Development and utilization of core outcome sets for studies relevant to the critically ill is in its infancy compared to other specialties. Notwithstanding, core outcome set development frameworks and guidelines are available, several sets are in various stages of development, and there is strong support from international investigator-led collaborations including the International Forum for Acute Care Trialists.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Appropriate selection and definition of outcome measures are essential for clinical trials to be maximally informative. Core outcome sets (an agreed, standardized collection of outcomes measured and reported in all trials for a specific clinical area) were developed due to established inconsistencies in trial outcome selection. This review discusses the rationale for, and methods of, core outcome set development, as well as current initiatives in critical care. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent systematic reviews of reported outcomes and measurement instruments relevant to the critically ill highlight inconsistencies in outcome selection, definition, and measurement, thus establishing the need for core outcome sets. Current critical care initiatives include development of core outcome sets for trials aimed at reducing mechanical ventilation duration; rehabilitation following critical illness; long-term outcomes in acute respiratory failure; and epidemic and pandemic studies of severe acute respiratory infection. SUMMARY: Development and utilization of core outcome sets for studies relevant to the critically ill is in its infancy compared to other specialties. Notwithstanding, core outcome set development frameworks and guidelines are available, several sets are in various stages of development, and there is strong support from international investigator-led collaborations including the International Forum for Acute Care Trialists.
Authors: Victor D Dinglas; Elizabeth Colantuoni; E Wesley Ely; Catherine L Hough; Peter E Morris; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Amy W Wozniak; Ramona O Hopkins; Dale M Needham Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Claire J Tipping; Meg Harrold; Anne Holland; Lorena Romero; Travis Nisbet; Carol L Hodgson Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Carol L Hodgson; Alison E Turnbull; Theodore J Iwashyna; Ann Parker; Wesley Davis; Clifton O Bingham; Nicola R Watts; Simon Finfer; Dale M Needham Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: Victor D Dinglas; Caroline M Chessare; Wesley E Davis; Ann Parker; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Clifton O Bingham; Alison E Turnbull; Dale M Needham Journal: Thorax Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Dale M Needham; Kristin A Sepulveda; Victor D Dinglas; Caroline M Chessare; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Clifton O Bingham; Alison E Turnbull Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Christian König; Bastian Matt; Andreas Kortgen; Alison E Turnbull; Christiane S Hartog Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Hallie C Prescott; Theodore J Iwashyna; Bronagh Blackwood; Thierry Calandra; Linda L Chlan; Karen Choong; Bronwen Connolly; Paul Dark; Luigi Ferrucci; Simon Finfer; Timothy D Girard; Carol Hodgson; Ramona O Hopkins; Catherine L Hough; James C Jackson; Flavia R Machado; John C Marshall; Cheryl Misak; Dale M Needham; Pinaki Panigrahi; Konrad Reinhart; Sachin Yende; Ross Zafonte; Kathryn M Rowan; Derek C Angus Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kitty S Chan; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Victor D Dinglas; Catherine L Hough; Carl Shanholtz; E Wesley Ely; Peter E Morris; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; James C Jackson; Ramona O Hopkins; Dale M Needham Journal: Thorax Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Alison E Turnbull; Anahita Rabiee; Wesley E Davis; Mohamed Farhan Nasser; Venkat Reddy Venna; Rohini Lolitha; Ramona O Hopkins; O Joseph Bienvenu; Karen A Robinson; Dale M Needham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 7.598