Literature DB >> 28756187

Under (implicit) pressure: young Black and Latina women's perceptions of contraceptive care.

Anu Manchikanti Gomez1, Mikaela Wapman2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand the ways in which young women of color experienced pressure from healthcare providers during contraceptive care, including the impact of these encounters on contraceptive decision making and reproductive autonomy.
METHODS: Data were drawn from a qualitative study of contraceptive decision making, which included 38 young (age 18-24) Latina and Black women recruited using community-based and online strategies. We analyzed in-depth interview data from a subsample of 27 young women who described experiencing pressure from healthcare providers during contraceptive care. We conducted a thematic analysis of coded data using a cross-case analytic approach.
RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that the pressure experienced by our participants was typically subtle and constrained reproductive autonomy to varying degrees. We termed this phenomenon implicit pressure owing to the under-the-surface nature of these experiences - that is, participants perceived an implied outcome regarding contraceptive use favored by their providers. Participants felt implicitly pressured when providers appeared to prefer certain methods based on imbalanced provision of information, tone of voice and affect, and minimization of or failure to describe potential side effects. Some participants accepted their providers' contraceptive suggestions as a way to end counseling encounters - methods they rapidly discontinued. Experiences of implicit pressure were longitudinally impactful, with some participants curtailing future healthcare access and contraceptive use because of negative clinical encounters.
CONCLUSIONS: Practices that implicitly pressure women in contraceptive counseling can infringe upon reproductive autonomy and reinforce health inequities when they engender mistrust of healthcare, providers and contraception. IMPLICATIONS: This study underscores the importance of high-quality contraceptive care for young women of color. Adverse healthcare experiences during adolescence and young adulthood can negatively impact future health-seeking behavior, with important implications for health throughout the life course. Patient-centered approaches may positively affect patients' experiences while continuing to facilitate contraceptive discussions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Family planning care; Healthcare disparities; Qualitative research; Young women

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28756187     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  39 in total

1.  Agreement between Self-Reported "Ideal" and Currently Used Contraceptive Methods among Women Veterans Using the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Authors:  Colleen P Judge-Golden; Tierney E Wolgemuth; Xinhua Zhao; Maria K Mor; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-04-19

2.  Women's Reproductive Rights Policies and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A State-Level Analysis to Assess the Role of Race and Nativity Status.

Authors:  May Sudhinaraset; Dovile Vilda; Jessica D Gipson; Marta Bornstein; Maeve E Wallace
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.

Authors:  Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-20

4.  Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kristine Hopkins; Kari White; Sarah E Baum; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Birth Control Connect: A randomized trial of an online group to disseminate contraceptive information.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Edith Fox; Anjana E Sharma; Jingwen Zhang; Sijia Yang; Damon Centola
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Do Adolescent Women's Contraceptive Preferences Predict Method Use and Satisfaction? A Survey of Northern California Family Planning Clients.

Authors:  Amelia W Walker; Lisa Stern; Danielle Cipres; Amanda Rodriguez; Janette Alvarez; Dominika Seidman
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Medical conditions, pregnancy perspectives and contraceptive decision-making among young people: an exploratory, qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Stephanie Arteaga; Natalie Ingraham; Jennet Arcara
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Ensuring our research reflects our values: The role of family planning research in advancing reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Reiley Reed; Edith Fox; Dominika Seidman; Cara Hall; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Attitudes and beliefs of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding Medicaid postpartum sterilization - A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Roselle Ponsaran; Laura Morello; Leila Katabi; Rosemary T Behmer Hansen; Nikki Zite; Kari White
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Patient perceptions of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Katharine Sznajder; Diana N Carvajal; Carolyn Sufrin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.