Literature DB >> 28755164

[Allogeneic transplants for biological reconstruction of bone defects].

R Windhager1, G M Hobusch2, M Matzner2.   

Abstract

A combination of allogeneic and autologous bone transplants is frequently used for the biological reconstruction of bone defects. Autologous bone transplants can be used either in the form of structural or cancellous bone transplants. The osteogenic potential of autologous cancellous bone is well-known and is still the gold standard with respect to osteoinduction and remodelling. Structural transplants, such as fibular and tricortical iliac crest grafts can be transplanted either free, i.e. non-vascularized or vascularized with anastomosed vessels. Allogeneic bone transplants can be used in a spongiose or structural form. In revision endoprosthetics the use of allogeneic bone transplants has essentially been reduced to impaction grafting, due to the introduction of trabecular metal as a permanently stable substitute. Allogeneic transplants have been restricted due to 3D-printing and the associated individually adapted reconstruction. In individual cases combined reconstruction consisting of allograft and endoprosthesis provide the advantage of safe load transmission and permanent reconstruction by the endoprosthesis and the possibility of soft tissue insertion of the allograft.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic bone transplantation; Allografts; Autologous bone transplantation; Cancellous bone; Revision endoprosthetic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28755164     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3452-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  11 in total

1.  Factors affecting nonunion of the allograft-host junction.

Authors:  F J Hornicek; M C Gebhardt; W W Tomford; J I Sorger; M Zavatta; J P Menzner; H J Mankin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques.

Authors:  Rodolfo Capanna; Domenico A Campanacci; Nicolas Belot; Giovanni Beltrami; Marco Manfrini; Marco Innocenti; Massimo Ceruso
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Limb salvage using distraction osteogenesis. A classification of the technique.

Authors:  H Tsuchiya; K Tomita; K Minematsu; Y Mori; N Asada; S Kitano
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-05

Review 4.  Reconstruction of non-contained acetabular defects with impaction grafting, a reinforcement mesh and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component.

Authors:  B S Waddell; A Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Vascularised or non-vascularised autologous fibular grafting for the reconstruction of a diaphyseal bone defect after resection of a musculoskeletal tumour.

Authors:  R Schuh; J Panotopoulos; S E Puchner; M Willegger; G M Hobusch; R Windhager; P T Funovics
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Long-term results for limb salvage with osteoarticular allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Christian M Ogilvie; Eileen A Crawford; Harish S Hosalkar; Joseph J King; Richard D Lackman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Clinical experience with allograft implantation. The first ten years.

Authors:  H J Mankin; S Doppelt; W Tomford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the humerus: functional outcome and survivorship.

Authors:  Ayesha Abdeen; Bang H Hoang; Edward A Athanasian; Carol D Morris; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Intercalary reconstructions with vascularised fibula and allograft after tumour resection in the lower limb.

Authors:  Katharina Rabitsch; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Ulrike Pirker-Frühauf; Christine Wibmer; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-05-23

10.  Reconstruction of the Distal Radius following Tumour Resection Using an Osteoarticular Allograft.

Authors:  Katharina Rabitsch; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Ulrike Pirker-Frühauf; Thomas Lovse; Reinhard Windhager; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-04-03
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Influence of thermodisinfection on impaction of cancellous bone : An in vitro model of femoral impaction bone grafting].

Authors:  C Fölsch; A Jahnke; A Groß; G Martels; G A Krombach; M Rickert; M Kampschulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Endoprosthetic replacement following intercalary resection].

Authors:  L Goebel; D Kohn; P Orth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  In vivo evaluation of the subchronic systemic toxicity of akermanite bioceramic for bone regeneration following ISO standard methods.

Authors:  Nan Ma; Bing Ma; Yanling Zhou; Haibo Zhu; Ying Zhou; Zhiguang Huan; Peiji Wang; Jiang Chang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Composite Coatings for Osteoblast Growth Attachment Fabricated by Matrix-Assisted Pulsed Laser Evaporation.

Authors:  Valentina Grumezescu; Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu; Anton Ficai; Irina Negut; Bogdan Ștefan Vasile; Bianca Gălățeanu; Ariana Hudiță
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Mid- to long-term results of modified non-vascularized allogeneic fibula grafting combined with core decompression and bone grafting for early femoral head necrosis.

Authors:  Chen Changjun; Li Donghai; Zhao Xin; Chen Liyile; Wang Qiuru; Kang Pengde
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Effect of synthetic bone replacement material of different size on shear stress resistance within impacted native and thermodisinfected cancellous bone: an in vitro femoral impaction bone grafting model.

Authors:  C Fölsch; P Sahm; C A Fonseca Ulloa; G A Krombach; M Kampschulte; M Rickert; A Pruss; A Jahnke
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 1.522

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.