Literature DB >> 28755156

Cochrane in CORR ®: Surgical Versus Non-surgical Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Ilyas S Aleem1, Brian Drew2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28755156      PMCID： PMC5638738          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-017-5452-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews.

Authors:  P P Glasziou; S L Sanders
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Regina Kunz; David Atkins; Jan Brozek; Gunn Vist; Philip Alderson; Paul Glasziou; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  David A Chad
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily Blood; Brett Hanscom; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Anna Tosteson; William A Abdu; Wenyan Zhao; Tamara S Morgan; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luciana Gazzi Macedo; Abraham Hum; Laura Kuleba; Joey Mo; Linda Truong; Mankeen Yeung; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-07-25

7.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Brook I Martin; William Kreuter; David C Goodman; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer.

Authors:  R Sobottke; M Röllinghoff; J Siewe; U Schlegel; A Yagdiran; M Spangenberg; R Lesch; P Eysel; T Koy
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2010-12-03

9.  Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Ilyas S Aleem; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Eugene Carragee; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  Microscopic decompressive laminectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Xiuxia Li; Xiaogang Zhang; Daping Qin; Guodong Yang; Guodong Gao; Hua Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Wide Variability in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures After Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James P Winebrake; Francis Lovecchio; Michael Steinhaus; James Farmer; Andrew Sama
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-03-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.