Literature DB >> 12111916

Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews.

P P Glasziou1, S L Sanders.   

Abstract

What causes heterogeneity in systematic reviews of controlled trials? First, it may be an artefact of the summary measures used, of study design features such as duration of follow-up or the reliability of outcome measures. Second, it may be due to real variation in the treatment effect and hence provides the opportunity to identify factors that may modify the impact of treatment. These factors may include features of the population such as: severity of illness, age and gender; intervention factors such as dose, timing or duration of treatment; and comparator factors such as the control group treatment or the co-interventions in both groups. The ideal way to study causes of true variation is within rather than between studies. In most situations however, we will have to make do with a study level investigation and hence need to be careful about adjusting for potential confounding by artefactual factors such as study design features. Such investigation of artefactual and true causes of heterogeneity form essential steps in moving from a combined effect estimate to application to particular populations and individuals. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12111916     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  54 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Peer-Led Self-Management Programs for Increasing Physical Activity.

Authors:  Krista L Best; William C Miller; Janice J Eng; Francois Routhier
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Excess in cardiovascular events on Mondays: a meta-analysis and prospective study.

Authors:  Adrian G Barnett; Annette J Dobson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Stefan Sauerland; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Research results have expiration dates: ensuring timely systematic reviews.

Authors:  Julie Barroso; Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Systematic reviews of meta-analyses: applications and limitations.

Authors:  Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis].

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Claudia Wild; Philipp Mad
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

8.  Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Res Sch       Date:  2006

9.  Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Gordon S Doig; Philippa T Heighes; Fiona Simpson; Elizabeth A Sweetman; Andrew R Davies
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.