Jestin N Carlson1, Krista M Foster2, Jesse M Pines3, Christopher K Corbit4, Michael J Ward5, Muhammad Zia Hydari2, Arvind Venkat6. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA; US Acute Care Solutions, Canton, OH. 2. Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Departments of Emergency Medicine and Health Policy and Management, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC. 4. US Acute Care Solutions, Canton, OH. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA; US Acute Care Solutions, Canton, OH. Electronic address: arvind.venkat@ahn.org.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We examine the association between emergency physician characteristics and practice factors with the risk of being named in a malpractice claim. METHODS: We used malpractice claims along with provider, operational, and jurisdictional data from a national emergency medicine group (87 emergency departments [EDs] in 15 states from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2014) to assess the relationship between individual physician and practice variables and being named in a malpractice claim. Individual and practice factors included years in practice, emergency medicine board certification, visit admission rate, relative value units generated per hour, total patients treated as attending physician of record, working at multiple facilities, working primarily overnight shifts, patient experience data percentile, and state malpractice environment. We assessed the relationship between emergency physician and practice variables and malpractice claims, using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 9,477,150 ED visits involving 1,029 emergency physicians, there were 98 malpractice claims against 90 physicians (9%). Increasing total number of years in practice (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.06) and higher visit volume (adjusted odds ratio 1.09 per 1,000 visits; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.12) were associated with being named in a malpractice claim. No other factors were associated with malpractice claims. CONCLUSION: In this sample of emergency physicians, 1 in 11 were named in a malpractice claim during 4.5 years. Total number of years in practice and visit volume were the only identified factors associated with being named, suggesting that exposure to higher patient volumes and longer practice experience are the primary contributors to malpractice risk.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We examine the association between emergency physician characteristics and practice factors with the risk of being named in a malpractice claim. METHODS: We used malpractice claims along with provider, operational, and jurisdictional data from a national emergency medicine group (87 emergency departments [EDs] in 15 states from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2014) to assess the relationship between individual physician and practice variables and being named in a malpractice claim. Individual and practice factors included years in practice, emergency medicine board certification, visit admission rate, relative value units generated per hour, total patients treated as attending physician of record, working at multiple facilities, working primarily overnight shifts, patient experience data percentile, and state malpractice environment. We assessed the relationship between emergency physician and practice variables and malpractice claims, using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 9,477,150 ED visits involving 1,029 emergency physicians, there were 98 malpractice claims against 90 physicians (9%). Increasing total number of years in practice (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.06) and higher visit volume (adjusted odds ratio 1.09 per 1,000 visits; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.12) were associated with being named in a malpractice claim. No other factors were associated with malpractice claims. CONCLUSION: In this sample of emergency physicians, 1 in 11 were named in a malpractice claim during 4.5 years. Total number of years in practice and visit volume were the only identified factors associated with being named, suggesting that exposure to higher patient volumes and longer practice experience are the primary contributors to malpractice risk.
Authors: David M Studdert; Marie M Bismark; Michelle M Mello; Harnam Singh; Matthew J Spittal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel A Waxman; Michael D Greenberg; M Susan Ridgely; Arthur L Kellermann; Paul Heaton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jameel Abualenain; William J Frohna; Robert Shesser; Ru Ding; Mark Smith; Jesse M Pines Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Joshua A Isserman; Demian Szyld; Anthony J Dean; Christine M McCusker; Judd E Hollander Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Gerald B Hickson; Charles F Federspiel; James W Pichert; Cynthia S Miller; Jean Gauld-Jaeger; Preston Bost Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-06-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Shelby Mader; Connor Houghton; Robert Wenger; Marc A Probst; David A Schoenfeld; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Mark S Zocchi; Bernard S Black; Jestin N Carlson; Pablo Celedon; Ali Moghtaderi; Arvind Venkat Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2021-04-09
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Mark S Zocchi; Bernard S Black; Jestin N Carlson; Pablo Celedon; Ali Moghtaderi; Arvind Venkat Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Mark S Zocchi; Bernard S Black; Rebecca Kornas; Pablo Celedon; Ali Moghtaderi; Arvind Venkat Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 5.721