Literature DB >> 28753878

Short-term Outcomes and Costs Following Partial Nephrectomy in England: A Population-based Study.

Charlotte Camp1, Jamie O'Hara2, David Hughes2, Jim Adshead3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN) for localised renal cancers are well established. Outcomes and hospital activity following PN have not been studied for the English National Health System, despite a growing use of robotic-assisted PN (RAPN).
OBJECTIVE: To compare 90-d complication rates and 1-yr hospital activity and costs following PN using routinely-collected national data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analysed Hospital Episode Statistics data for 4275 patients undergoing open PN (OPN), laparoscopic PN, or RAPN between October 2008 and September 2014. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Hospital activity and costs estimated using multivariate Generalised Linear Models. Logistic regression was used to model postoperative complications. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Compared with RAPN, OPN experienced more frequent 90-d readmissions for wound-related complications (n=68 vs n=3, p=0.014) and postoperative infections (n=151 vs n=11, p=0.045). One-year inpatient admissions were higher in OPN (incidence rate: 1.628 vs 0.928, p=0.004). Outcomes in laparoscopic PN and RAPN were equivalent. In comparison to OPN, RAPN was associated with lower complication-related costs at 90 d (mean £317.21 vs £129.29, p=0.002) and total costs at 1 yr (mean £2998.55 vs £2089.37, p=0.024). Limitations were the absence of clinical indicators for risk adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital activity is significantly lower in the year immediately following RAPN compared with OPN. This is driven in part by a reduction in postoperative complications requiring readmission, reflecting lower total costs. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We analysed national data for 4275 patients undergoing partial nephrectomy via open, laparoscopic, or robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in England over a 6-yr period. Robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery was associated with fewer 90-d complications and lower total costs at 1-yr postintervention.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costs; Health economics; Kidney cancer; Minimally invasive; Outcomes; Partial nephrectomy; Robotic assisted surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28753878     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  5 in total

Review 1.  Economic Burden of Renal Cell Carcinoma-Part I: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Chun-Ru Chien; Daniel M Geynisman; Bumyang Kim; Ying Xu; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Trans-peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in posterior renal tumours: need for a risk-stratified patient individualised approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew McLean; Ankur Mukherjee; Chandan Phukan; Rajan Veeratterapillay; Naeem Soomro; Bhaskar Somani; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-05-14

3.  Economic evaluation of different routes of surgery for the management of endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Esther L Moss; George Morgan; Antony Martin; Panos Sarhanis; Thomas Ind
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Major System Change in Specialist Cancer Surgery in London, England, Using Linked Patient-Level Electronic Health Records and Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

Authors:  Caroline S Clarke; Mariya Melnychuk; Angus I G Ramsay; Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Claire Levermore; Ravi Barod; Axel Bex; John Hines; Muntzer M Mughal; Kathy Pritchard-Jones; Maxine Tran; David C Shackley; Stephen Morris; Naomi J Fulop; Rachael M Hunter
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Comparison of 1-Year Health Care Expenditures and Utilization Following Minimally Invasive vs Open Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Kennedy E Okhawere; Gediwon Milky; I-Fan Shih; Yanli Li; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.