Literature DB >> 28752665

Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.

Caroline Barras1, Dirk Kerzel1.   

Abstract

Search for a shape target is difficult when its shape is similar to the shape of the surrounding nontargets and easy when it is dissimilar. We asked whether interference from a salient but irrelevant color singleton depended on search difficulty as manipulated by target-nontarget similarity. We found that interference was strong in difficult searches, and the occurrence of an electrophysiological index of attentional selectivity (the N2pc component) confirmed that attention was captured by the distractor. In contrast, interference from the distractor was weak with easy searches, and the occurrence of the PD component confirmed that saliency signals from the distractor were suppressed. The results suggest that attentional suppression of salient but irrelevant distractors is only possible when search is efficient (i.e., with low target-nontarget similarity), otherwise, attentional capture occurs. Further, we analyzed the Ppc component, a positivity occurring between 100 and 200 ms after stimulus onset contralateral to a salient feature discontinuity. It has been suggested that the Ppc reflects bottom-up saliency signals, but we found the Ppc to occur only when the salient stimulus was unlikely to be selected, as in efficient searches. Thus, attentional requirements modulate the Ppc component.
© 2017 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N2pc; PD; Ppc; attention; attentional capture; attentional suppression; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28752665     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  7 in total

1.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spatial cueing effects do not always index attentional capture: evidence for a priority accumulation framework.

Authors:  Maya Darnell; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-06

3.  Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Early Visual Processing of Feature Saliency Tasks: A Review of Psychophysical Experiments.

Authors:  Shiva Kamkar; Hamid Abrishami Moghaddam; Reza Lashgari
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-26

6.  Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.

Authors:  Rolf Verleger; Kamila Śmigasiewicz; Lars Michael; Laura Heikaus; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-11

7.  Automatic object-based spatial selection depends on the distribution of sustained attention.

Authors:  Ema Shamasdin Bidiwala; Miranda Scolari
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.