Literature DB >> 21633052

Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis.

So Yeon Kim1, Kyoung Ho Lee, Kyuseok Kim, Tae Yun Kim, Hye Seung Lee, Seung-sik Hwang, Ki Jun Song, Heung Sik Kang, Young Hoon Kim, Joong Eui Rhee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare low and standard radiation doses in intravenous contrast material-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in young adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed consent. The study included 257 patients (age range, 15-40 years) who underwent CT for suspected appendicitis performed by using a low radiation dose (n = 125) or a standard radiation dose (n = 132). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the diagnosis of appendicitis and diagnostic confidence as recorded in prospective CT reports between the two groups.
RESULTS: For 55 low-radiation-dose (median dose-length product, 122 mGy · cm) and 44 standard-dose (median dose-length product, 544 mGy · cm) examinations, one of two abdominal radiologists made primary reports that served as final reports. For the remaining examinations, on-call radiologists with differing levels of experience issued preliminary reports and the two abdominal radiologists then provided final reports. In the primary reports, the low- and standard-dose CT groups did not significantly differ in area under the ROC curve (0.96 vs 0.97, P = .76), sensitivity (90% [38 of 42] vs 89% [47 of 53], P > .99), or specificity (92% [76 of 83] vs 94% [74 of 79], P = .74) in the diagnosis of appendicitis. There was also no significant difference between the two groups in the confidence level when diagnosing (P = .71) or excluding (P = .20) appendicitis in the primary reports. Similar results were observed for the final reports. The two dose groups also did not significantly differ in terms of appendiceal visualization, diagnosis of appendiceal perforation, or sensitivity for alternative diagnoses.
CONCLUSION: Low-dose CT may have comparable diagnostic performance to standard-dose CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in young adults. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21633052     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11102247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Abdominal-pelvic scanning parameters revisited: a case for Z-axis reduction in patients with clinical suspicion for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Darshan C Patel; Yu-Hui Huang; Jonathan Meyer; Amir Sepahdari
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27

2.  Diagnosing acute appendicitis using a nonoral contrast CT protocol in patients with a BMI of less than 25.

Authors:  Vijay Ramalingam; David D B Bates; Karen Buch; Jennifer Uyeda; Kathy M Zhao; Lindsey A Storer; Marisa B Roberts; Christina A Lebedis; Jorge A Soto; Stephan W Anderson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-07-08

3.  Can We Perform CT of the Appendix with Less Than 1 mSv? A De-escalating Dose-simulation Study.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Park; Jong-June Jeon; Sung Soo Lee; Amar C Dhanantwari; Ji Ye Sim; Hae Young Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The diagnostic performance of reduced-dose CT for suspected appendicitis in paediatric and adult patients: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hee Mang Yoon; Chong Hyun Suh; Young Ah Cho; Jeong Rye Kim; Jin Seong Lee; Ah Young Jung; Jung Heon Kim; Jeong-Yong Lee; So Yeon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Pediatric appendicitis with appendicolith often presents with prolonged abdominal pain and a high risk of perforation.

Authors:  Hee Mang Yoon; Jung Heon Kim; Jong Seung Lee; Jeong-Min Ryu; Dae Yeon Kim; Jeong-Yong Lee
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Tin Nadarevic; Goran Poropat; Vesna Stefanac Nadarevic; Davor Stimac
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults.

Authors:  Jenny Tannoury; Bassam Abboud
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Bo Rud; Thomas S Vejborg; Eli D Rappeport; Johannes B Reitsma; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-19

9.  Negative appendicectomy rate as a quality metric in the management of appendicitis: impact of computed tomography, Alvarado score and the definition of negative appendicectomy.

Authors:  J G Mariadason; W N Wang; M K Wallack; A Belmonte; H Matari
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  LOCAT (low-dose computed tomography for appendicitis trial) comparing clinical outcomes following low- vs standard-dose computed tomography as the first-line imaging test in adolescents and young adults with suspected acute appendicitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Soyeon Ahn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.