Buntaro Fujita1,2,3, Wolfram-Hubertus Zimmermann4,5. 1. Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. 2. DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 3. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. 4. Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. w.zimmermann@med.uni-goettingen.de. 5. DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. w.zimmermann@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview of the current state of tissue-engineered heart repair with a special focus on the anticipated modes of action of tissue-engineered therapy candidates and particular implications as to transplant immunology. RECENT FINDINGS: Myocardial tissue engineering technologies have made tremendous advances in recent years. Numerous different strategies are under investigation and have reached different stages on their way to clinical translation. Studies in animal models demonstrated that heart repair requires either remuscularization by delivery of bona fide cardiomyocytes or paracrine support for the activation of endogenous repair mechanisms. Tissue engineering approaches result in enhanced cardiomyocyte retention and sustained remuscularization, but may also be explored for targeted paracrine or mechanical support. Some of the more advanced tissue engineering approaches are already tested clinically; others are at late stages of pre-clinical development. Process optimization towards cGMP compatibility and clinical scalability of contractile engineered human myocardium is an essential step towards clinical translation. Long-term allograft retention can be achieved under immune suppression. HLA matching may be an option to enhance graft retention and reduce the need for comprehensive immune suppression. Tissue-engineered heart repair is entering the clinical stage of the translational pipeline. Like in any effective therapy, side effects must be anticipated and carefully controlled. Allograft implantation under immune suppression is the most likely clinical scenario. Strategies to overcome transplant rejection are evolving and may further boost the clinical acceptance of tissue-engineered heart repair.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview of the current state of tissue-engineered heart repair with a special focus on the anticipated modes of action of tissue-engineered therapy candidates and particular implications as to transplant immunology. RECENT FINDINGS: Myocardial tissue engineering technologies have made tremendous advances in recent years. Numerous different strategies are under investigation and have reached different stages on their way to clinical translation. Studies in animal models demonstrated that heart repair requires either remuscularization by delivery of bona fide cardiomyocytes or paracrine support for the activation of endogenous repair mechanisms. Tissue engineering approaches result in enhanced cardiomyocyte retention and sustained remuscularization, but may also be explored for targeted paracrine or mechanical support. Some of the more advanced tissue engineering approaches are already tested clinically; others are at late stages of pre-clinical development. Process optimization towards cGMP compatibility and clinical scalability of contractile engineered human myocardium is an essential step towards clinical translation. Long-term allograft retention can be achieved under immune suppression. HLA matching may be an option to enhance graft retention and reduce the need for comprehensive immune suppression. Tissue-engineered heart repair is entering the clinical stage of the translational pipeline. Like in any effective therapy, side effects must be anticipated and carefully controlled. Allograft implantation under immune suppression is the most likely clinical scenario. Strategies to overcome transplant rejection are evolving and may further boost the clinical acceptance of tissue-engineered heart repair.
Authors: Arne Hansen; Alexandra Eder; Marlene Bönstrup; Marianne Flato; Marco Mewe; Sebastian Schaaf; Bülent Aksehirlioglu; Alexander P Schwoerer; Alexander Schwörer; June Uebeler; Thomas Eschenhagen Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Gerd P Meyer; Kai C Wollert; Joachim Lotz; Jan Steffens; Peter Lippolt; Stephanie Fichtner; Hartmut Hecker; Arnd Schaefer; Lubomir Arseniev; Bernd Hertenstein; Arnold Ganser; Helmut Drexler Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Amandine F G Godier-Furnémont; Malte Tiburcy; Eva Wagner; Matthias Dewenter; Simon Lämmle; Ali El-Armouche; Stephan E Lehnart; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Wolfram-Hubertus Zimmermann Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: D A Taylor; B Z Atkins; P Hungspreugs; T R Jones; M C Reedy; K A Hutcheson; D D Glower; W E Kraus Journal: Nat Med Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: George Kensah; Angelica Roa Lara; Julia Dahlmann; Robert Zweigerdt; Kristin Schwanke; Jan Hegermann; David Skvorc; Anke Gawol; Azadeh Azizian; Stefan Wagner; Lars S Maier; Andreas Krause; Gerald Dräger; Matthias Ochs; Axel Haverich; Ina Gruh; Ulrich Martin Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ke Wei; Vahid Serpooshan; Cecilia Hurtado; Marta Diez-Cuñado; Mingming Zhao; Sonomi Maruyama; Wenhong Zhu; Giovanni Fajardo; Michela Noseda; Kazuto Nakamura; Xueying Tian; Qiaozhen Liu; Andrew Wang; Yuka Matsuura; Paul Bushway; Wenqing Cai; Alex Savchenko; Morteza Mahmoudi; Michael D Schneider; Maurice J B van den Hoff; Manish J Butte; Phillip C Yang; Kenneth Walsh; Bin Zhou; Daniel Bernstein; Mark Mercola; Pilar Ruiz-Lozano Journal: Nature Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kaytlyn A Gerbin; Katie A Mitzelfelt; Xuan Guan; Amy M Martinson; Charles E Murry Journal: Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 6.698