| Literature DB >> 28751741 |
Zeyan Wu1,2,3, Jianjuan Li4, Jie Zheng4, Jinfu Liu4, Shuying Liu1, Wenxiong Lin5,6,7, Chengzhen Wu8.
Abstract
This study examined the hypotheses that soil microbial community composition and catabolic activity would significantly degenerated by consecutive monoculture in Chinese fir plantations. The phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) and community level physiological profiles (CLPP) methods were used to assess the variations of soil microbial community among the first rotation Chinese fir plantation (FCP), the second rotation plantation (SCP) and the third rotation plantation (TCP). The total content of PLFA biomarkers was highest in FCP, followed by SCP, and TCP was the least detected. Conversely, the fungi/bacteria ratio significantly increased in the SCP and TCP soils. The average well-color development (AWCD) values significantly decreased (FCP > SCP > TCP). However, the sum of AWCD values of amino acids, carboxylic acids and phenolic compounds were higher significantly in the SCP and TCP soils than FCP soils, suggesting that the microflora feeding on acids gradually became predominant in the continuous monoculture plantation soils. Soil C/N ratio was one of the most important factors to soil microbial diversity. Both the PLFA and CLPP results illustrated the long-term pure plantation pattern exacerbated the microecological imbalance in the rhizospheric soils of Chinese fir, and markedly decreased the soil microbial community diversity and metabolic activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28751741 PMCID: PMC5532251 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06768-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of experimental plots.
| Characteristics | FCP | SCP | TCP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Altitude (m) | 232 | 275 | 239 |
| Slope | 30° | 31° | 28° |
| Slope aspect | ES40° | ES35° | ES40° |
| Average diameter at breast height (cm) | 17.39 | 13.27 | 11.94 |
| Average height (m) | 13.61 | 10.52 | 9.03 |
| Stand density (stem/ha) | 930 | 945 | 945 |
| Soil pH | 5.83 ± 0.26a | 5.64 ± 0.33a | 5.28 ± 0.21a |
| Total organic carbon (TOC, g·kg−1) | 23.54 ± 0.30a | 20.09 ± 0.46c | 21.37 ± 0.15b |
| Total nitrogen (TN, g·kg−1) | 1.23 ± 0.01a | 0.98 ± 0.01b | 0.96 ± 0.01b |
| Available nitrogen (AN, mg·kg−1) | 35.84 ± 0.88a | 30.42 ± 0.97b | 26.11 ± 1.28c |
| Total phosphorus (TP, g·kg−1) | 0.45 ± 0.01a | 0.40 ± 0.01a | 0.33 ± 0.01b |
| Available phosphorus (AP, mg·kg−1) | 3.28 ± 0.11ab | 3.56 ± 0.14a | 2.97 ± 0.15b |
| Total potassium (TK, g·kg−1) | 18.51 ± 0.45a | 17.38 ± 0.29a | 15.74 ± 0.38b |
| Available potassium (AK, mg·kg−1) | 140.66 ± 2.65a | 125.17 ± 3.17b | 123.29 ± 1.97b |
| C:N | 19.13 | 20.50 | 22.26 |
Types and contents of PLFAs in three rotations plantations (ug·g−1).
| No. | Biomarkers | Microbial group | Stand ages | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCP | SCP | TCP | |||
| 1 | 16:00 | Gram(−) bacteria | 9.96 ± 0.20a | 8.54 ± 0.09b | 7.23 ± 0.14c |
| 2 | i17:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 12.47 ± 0.17a | 9.08 ± 0.19b | 5.49 ± 0.07c |
| 3 | cy17:0 | Gram(−) bacteria | 3.98 ± 0.08a | 3.10 ± 0.05b | 2.11 ± 0.05c |
| 4 | 10Me16:0 | Actinomycete | 4.29 ± 0.11a | 4.45 ± 0.04a | 4.51 ± 0.07a |
| 5 | 16:1ω7c | Gram(−) bacteria | 1.25 ± 0.04a | 0.88 ± 0.02b | 0.52 ± 0.01c |
| 6 | i18:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 5.66 ± 0.24a | 4.78 ± 0.09b | 3.54 ± 0.15c |
| 7 | i14:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 1.59 ± 0.04a | 1.28 ± 0.03b | 1.01 ± 0.01c |
| 8 | i16:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 14.88 ± 0.25c | 17.54 ± 0.27b | 19.63 ± 0.22a |
| 9 | cy19:0 | Gram(−) bacteria | 15.37 ± 0.13a | 13.22 ± 0.11b | 13.57 ± 0.14b |
| 10 | 20:4ω6c(6,9,12,15) | Protozoon | 0.45 ± 0.01b | 0.58 ± 0.03a | 0.62 ± 0.01a |
| 11 | 18:3ω3 | Fungi | 1.67 ± 0.02c | 1.94 ± 0.02b | 2.53 ± 0.02a |
| 12 | a16:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 1.65 ± 0.08 | — | — |
| 13 | a17:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 3.42 ± 0.10a | 2.65 ± 0.06b | 2.51 ± 0.10a |
| 14 | i15:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 4.96 ± 0.22a | 4.15 ± 0.11b | 3.33 ± 0.08c |
| 15 | 15:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 6.05 ± 0.07a | 4.41 ± 0.05b | 3.62 ± 0.06c |
| 16 | 18:3ω6c(6,9,12) | Fungi | 8.19 ± 0.11c | 11.07 ± 0.14b | 12.63 ± 0.12a |
| 17 | 16:1ω9c | Gram(+) bacteria | 0.85 ± 0.02a | 0.94 ± 0.03a | — |
| 18 | 9Me18:0 | Actinomycete | 2.53 ± 0.06b | 2.58 ± 0.03b | 3.42 ± 0.05a |
| 19 | 18:3w3 | Fungi | 1.06 ± 0.01b | 1.93 ± 0.02a | 2.09 ± 0.02a |
| 20 | 16:1ω9t | Gram(−) bacteria | 0.48 ± 0.01a | 0.52 ± 0.01a | 0.49 ± 0.01a |
| 21 | a15:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 1.42 ± 0.02a | 1.05 ± 0.01b | 0.63 ± 0.01c |
| Total content of different PLFA biomarkers | 102.18 ± 1.15a | 94.69 ± 0.96b | 89.48 ± 0.64c | ||
The statistics of major microorganism groups (ug·g−1).
| Major microorganism groups | Different generations | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FCP | SCP | TCP | |
| Bacteria | 83.99 ± 1.47a | 75.74 ± 1.32b | 69.72 ± 0.86c |
| Gram(+) | 52.95 ± 0.50a | 49.48 ± 0.37b | 45.80 ± 0.21c |
| Gram(−) | 31.04 ± 0.36a | 26.26 ± 0.19b | 23.92 ± 0.14c |
| Fungi | 10.92 ± 0.11c | 14.67 ± 0.18b | 16.39 ± 0.23a |
| Actinomycete | 6.82 ± 0.09b | 7.03 ± 0.08b | 7.93 ± 0.13a |
| Gram(+)/Gram(−) (%) | 170.59 | 188.42 | 191.47 |
| Fungi/Bacteria (%) | 13.00 | 19.37 | 23.51 |
Figure 1Principal components analysis (PCA) of three rotations plantations.
Figure 2Changes of AWCD of soil microbe community with incubation time in different generations.
Figure 3Mean catabolic activity per well for each substrate group in different generation soils.
Figure 4Sum of AWCD values of amino acids, carboxylic acids and phenolic compounds at 96 h.
Correlation analysis of microbial community diversity and soil properties.
| Simpson index | Shannon index | Richness index | McIntosh index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | −0.395 | −0.347 | −0.384 | −0.29 |
| TOC/(g·kg−1) | 0.948** | 0.977** | 0.965** | 0.983** |
| TN/(g·kg−1) | 0.859* | 0.8062* | 0.725 | 0.870* |
| AN/(mg·kg−1) | 0.953** | 0.937** | 0.918** | 0.892** |
| TP/(g·kg−1) | 0.734 | 0.887* | 0.891* | 0.702 |
| AP/(mg·kg−1) | 0.911** | 0.766 | 0.721 | 0.634 |
| TK/(mg·kg−1) | 0.862* | 0.810 | 0.715 | 0.744 |
| AK/(mg·kg−1) | 0.537 | 0.682 | 0.705 | 0.725 |
| C/N | −0.934** | −0.927** | −0.919** | −0.971** |
Note: *means P < 0. 05, significant correlation; **means P < 0. 01, extremely significant correlation.