| Literature DB >> 26267338 |
Zeyan Wu1, Stacey Elizabeth Haack2, Wenxiong Lin1, Bailian Li3, Linkun Wu1, Changxun Fang1, Zhixing Zhang1.
Abstract
Soil microbes play an essential role in the forest ecosystem as an active component. This study examined the hypothesis that soil microbial community structure and metabolic activity would vary with the increasing stand ages in long-term pure plantations of Pinus elliottii. The phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) combined with community level physiological profiles (CLPP) method was used to assess these characteristics in the rhizospheric soils of P. elliottii. We found that the soil microbial communities were significantly different among different stand ages of P. elliottii plantations. The PLFA analysis indicated that the bacterial biomass was higher than the actinomycic and fungal biomass in all stand ages. However, the bacterial biomass decreased with the increasing stand ages, while the fungal biomass increased. The four maximum biomarker concentrations in rhizospheric soils of P. elliottii for all stand ages were 18:1ω9c, 16:1ω7c, 18:3ω6c (6,9,12) and cy19:0, representing measures of fungal and gram negative bacterial biomass. In addition, CLPP analysis revealed that the utilization rate of amino acids, polymers, phenolic acids, and carbohydrates of soil microbial community gradually decreased with increasing stand ages, though this pattern was not observed for carboxylic acids and amines. Microbial community diversity, as determined by the Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index, Richness index and McIntosh index, significantly decreased as stand age increased. Overall, both the PLFA and CLPP illustrated that the long-term pure plantation pattern exacerbated the microecological imbalance previously described in the rhizospheric soils of P. elliottii, and markedly decreased the soil microbial community diversity and metabolic activity. Based on the correlation analysis, we concluded that the soil nutrient and C/N ratio most significantly contributed to the variation of soil microbial community structure and metabolic activity in different stand ages of P. elliottii plantations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26267338 PMCID: PMC4533972 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Soil physicochemical properties in different stand ages of P. elliottii plantations.
| Stand ages | Ph | TOC/ (g·kg-1) | TN/ (g·kg-1) | AN/ (mg·kg-1) | TP/ (g·kg-1) | AP/ (mg·kg-1) | TK/ (mg·kg-1) | AK/ (mg·kg-1) | C/N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.36a | 21.86a | 1.12a | 38.22a | 0.56a | 3.76a | 23.99a | 109.11a | 19.51d |
|
| 6.01b | 19.54b | 0.95b | 34.09b | 0.53a | 3.05b | 20.06b | 89.17c | 20.56c |
|
| 5.82c | 17.37c | 0.81c | 27.84c | 0.41b | 2.67c | 19.97c | 96.24b | 21.44b |
|
| 5.78c | 16.28d | 0.75c | 19.96d | 0.33c | 1.98d | 13.96d | 76.08d | 21.70a |
Note: Values within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P<0.05. The same is true in subsequent table columns.
Types and contents of PLFAs in different stand ages of P. elliottii plantations (ug·g-1).
| No. | Biomarkers | Microbial group | Stand ages | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 10 | 18 | 25 | |||
|
| 18:1ω9c | Fungi | 6.91d | 8.23c | 13.78b | 15.26a |
|
| 16:1ω7c | Gram(-) bacteria | 11.36a | 9.21b | 7.94c | 6.44d |
|
| i14:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 3.59a | 2.88b | 2.41c | 2.38c |
|
| 10Me18:0 | Actinomycete | 4.66a | 3.54b | 3.45b | 3.06c |
|
| 16:00 | Gram(-) bacteria | 7.55a | 5.79b | 4.32c | 2.96d |
|
| cy19:0 | Gram(-) bacteria | 25.67a | 23.93b | 19.26c | 15.17d |
|
| 18:3ω6c(6,9,12) | Fungi | 9.74d | 11.43c | 14.94b | 15.85a |
|
| 16:1ω9c | Gram(+) bacteria | 4.09a | 2.56b | - | - |
|
| i18:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 5.66a | 4.78b | 4.04c | 3.44d |
|
| a17:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 3.31a | 2.79b | 2.54c | 2.46c |
|
| 10Me16:0 | Actinomycete | 3.93a | 3.27c | 3.44b | 3.85a |
|
| 18:00 | Gram(-) bacteria | 2.73a | 2.34b | 1.25c | 0.76d |
|
| cy17:0 | Gram(-) bacteria | 8.77a | 7.81c | 7.96b | 5.49d |
|
| 18:3ω3 | Fungi | 1.67d | 1.94c | 2.53b | 3.52a |
|
| 10Me17:0 | Actinomycete | 1.42 | - | - | - |
|
| i17:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 1.93a | 1.78b | 1.59c | 1.16d |
|
| 20:4ω6c(6,9,12,15) | Protozoon | 0.58b | 0.74a | 0.51b | 0.83a |
|
| 15:0 | Gram(+) bacteria | 4.45a | 3.78b | 0.93c | 0.67d |
|
| - | Total PLFA | 108.02a | 96.80b | 90.89c | 83.30d |
|
| - | Bacteria | 79.11a | 67.65b | 52.24c | 40.93d |
|
| - | Gram(+) | 23.03a | 18.57b | 11.51c | 10.11d |
|
| - | Gram(-) | 56.08a | 49.08b | 40.73c | 30.82d |
|
| - | Fungi | 18.32d | 21.60c | 31.25b | 34.63a |
|
| - | Actinomycete | 10.01a | 6.81b | 6.89b | 6.91b |
|
| - | Gram (+) / Gram (-) (%) | 41.06a | 37.84b | 28.26d | 32.80c |
|
| - | Fungi/ Bacteria (%) (F/B) | 23.16d | 31.93c | 59.82b | 84.61a |
Fig 1Principal component analysis on PLFAs of different microbial groups in soils.
The figure describes the variance of soil microbial communities in the different stand ages of P. elliottii were clearly different from each other.
Fig 2Changes of AWCD of soil microbe community with incubation time in soil samples of different stand ages.
The figure describes the AWCD of different stand soil change with incubation time, which were clearly different from each other.
Fig 3Carbon source utilization by soil microbial community at different stand ages of P. elliottii plantations.
The figure describes the carbon source utilization of different stand soil microbial communities were clearly different from each other.
Functional diversity indexes of soil microbial communities at different stand ages.
| Stand age | Simpson index | Shannon index | Richness index | McIntosh index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.974 | 3.449 | 17.33 | 0.933 |
|
| 0.926 | 3.286 | 15.19 | 0.876 |
|
| 0.908 | 3.193 | 13.72 | 0.768 |
|
| 0.875 | 3.051 | 11.09 | 0.669 |
Correlation analysis of microbial community diversity and soil properties.
| Simpson index | Shannon index | Richness index | McIntosh index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| -0.395 | -0.347 | -0.384 | -0.290 |
|
| 0.956 | 0.981 | 0.947 | 0.965 |
|
| 0.679 | 0.572 | 0.625 | 0.448 |
|
| 0.873 | 0.921 | 0.851 | 0.890 |
|
| 0.709 | 0.878* | 0.842 | 0.731 |
|
| 0.930 | 0.755 | 0.801 | 0.819 |
|
| 0.871 | 0.830 | 0.744 | 0.731 |
|
| 0.677 | 0.938 | 0.885 | 0.711 |
|
| -0.926 | -0.907 | -0.949 | -0.980 |
Note:
*means P < 0.05, significant correlation;
**means P < 0.01, extremely significant correlation.