Literature DB >> 28751404

Microbiomes of American Oysters (Crassostrea virginica) Harvested from Two Sites in the Chesapeake Bay.

Sylvia Ossai1, Padmini Ramachandran2, Andrea Ottesen2, Elizabeth Reed2, Angelo DePaola3, Salina Parveen4.   

Abstract

In this study, we used 16S rRNA gene amplicons to describe the bacterial microbiota associated with oysters (Crassostrea virginica) and seawater collected from two sites in the Chesapeake Bay. The dominant bacterial groups included those belonging to the order Pelagibacteraceae, family Enterobacteriaceae, and genus Synechococcus The microbiomes varied among oysters from the same site and between the two sites and months.
Copyright © 2017 Ossai et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28751404      PMCID: PMC5532842          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00729-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

American oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are one of the most important commercial catches in the Chesapeake Bay (1) and, as is well documented, act as important ecosystem engineers in bays and estuaries (2). A single adult oyster can filter up to 50 gal of water per day, playing a significant role in water quality. As filter feeders, oysters accumulate particles from surrounding waters, including a wide range of microorganisms that can include human pathogens, such as bacteria (e.g., Vibrio spp.) and viruses (e.g., Norovirus) (2–4). Infections from these pathogens can cause serious health issues (5, 6), which makes an improved understanding of the oyster microbiome an important public health and food safety objective (2, 3). Much work has effectively described the prevalence of human pathogens, such as Vibrio spp. (7–10), associated with oysters. Additional culture-independent profiling of bacterial species associated with oyster microbiomes will continue to improve our understanding of risk factors and mitigation strategies. We used a metagenomic approach (16S rRNA gene amplicons) to characterize the bacterial composition of C. virginica and water from the Chesapeake Bay. A total of 20 oysters and 12 water samples were collected between May and June 2016 from two sites (Manokin River and Chester River) in the Chesapeake Bay. At each collection event, five oysters and 1 L of water were collected from each site. All collected samples were transported to the University of Maryland–Eastern Shore and processed within 4 h of collection (9). Oysters were blended using a sterile Waring blender (Waring, Stamford, CT, USA) to produce homogenized samples (9). Water subsamples (3) containing 200 mL each were filtered using a 0.22-µm Sterivex filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) (8). All processed samples were stored at −80°C until DNA extraction (within 48 h). Genomic DNA from oyster homogenates and water samples were extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and the Powersoil DNA isolation kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), respectively. The 16S rRNA gene amplification targeted the V1-to-V3 region. The bacterial diversity observed in the oyster microbiome suggests that it hosts a diverse and dynamic bacterial community that is both site and temporally dependent. Temporal variation was evident with the family Pelagibacteraceae. Relative abundances of Pelagibacteraceae were 13.3% and 28.5% in oysters in May in Chester and Manokin, respectively. In June, the relative abundances were only 0.2% and 0.1% in oysters from Chester and Manokin, respectively. Synechococcus had relative abundances of 35.7% and 16.2% in oysters from the Chester and Manokin sites, respectively, in the month of June. Also in June, Enterobacteriaceae had relative abundances of 57.5% and 25.5% in oysters from the Manokin and Chester sites, respectively. Synechococcus (25.1%) and Pelagibacteraceae (23.5%) predominated in the water in Manokin and Chester, respectively, in June. Surprisingly, the average relative abundance of Vibrio spp. was never higher than 2.5% in either site or month. Additional biological replicates and a wider range of biogeographic and temporal sampling will continue to improve our understanding of bacterial microbiota associated with oysters in the Chesapeake Bay.

Accession number(s).

All data have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession numbers SRR5429782 through SRR5429811 (BioProject ID: PRJNA381771).
  7 in total

1.  Influence of environmental gradients on the abundance and distribution of Mycobacterium spp. in a coastal lagoon estuary.

Authors:  John Jacobs; Matt Rhodes; Brian Sturgis; Bob Wood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Seasonal abundance of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Alabama oysters.

Authors:  Angelo DePaola; Jessica L Nordstrom; John C Bowers; Joy G Wells; David W Cook
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Aerobic and facultative anaerobic heterotrophic bacteria associated to Mediterranean oysters and seawater.

Authors:  M J Pujalte; M Ortigosa; M C Macián; E Garay
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in the Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  A C Wright; R T Hill; J A Johnson; M C Roghman; R R Colwell; J G Morris
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Seasonal distribution of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters.

Authors:  Salina Parveen; Kumidini A Hettiarachchi; John C Bowers; Jessica L Jones; Mark L Tamplin; Rusty McKay; William Beatty; Kathy Brohawn; Ligia V Dasilva; Angelo Depaola
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Analysis of stomach and gut microbiomes of the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from coastal Louisiana, USA.

Authors:  Gary M King; Craig Judd; Cheryl R Kuske; Conor Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Metagenomic assessment of the eastern oyster-associated microbiota.

Authors:  Ashvini Chauhan; Denis Wafula; Dawn E Lewis; Ashish Pathak
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-10-23
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Variation in Survival and Gut Microbiome Composition of Hatchery-Grown Native Oysters at Various Locations within the Puget Sound.

Authors:  Emily Kunselman; Jeremiah J Minich; Micah Horwith; Jack A Gilbert; Eric E Allen
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  The gut microbiome of freshwater Unionidae mussels is determined by host species and is selectively retained from filtered seston.

Authors:  Eric A Weingarten; Carla L Atkinson; Colin R Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Amazonia Seasons Have an Influence in the Composition of Bacterial Gut Microbiota of Mangrove Oysters (Crassostrea gasar).

Authors:  Marcos Vinícius Reis Conceição; Sávio Souza Costa; Ana Paula Schaan; Ândrea Kely Campos Ribeiro-Dos-Santos; Artur Silva; Diego Assis das Graças; Maria Paula Cruz Schneider; Rafael Azevedo Baraúna
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes: Early Detection, Population Dynamics, and Quasimetagenomic Sequencing during Selective Enrichment.

Authors:  Eva Wagner; Annette Fagerlund; Solveig Langsrud; Trond Møretrø; Merete Rusås Jensen; Birgitte Moen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.792

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.