Literature DB >> 28751261

Getting a molecule into the clinic: Nonclinical testing and starting dose considerations.

Paul Baldrick1.   

Abstract

Examination of content of 35 Investigator Brochures (IBs) for small molecules (including some for oncology) used to support First-In-Human studies over a 2 year period (2014-2016) showed that a mean of 37 nonclinical studies were performed per molecule with pharmacology, ADME and toxicology testing contributing 43%, 32% and 24% of the studies, respectively. Examination of 11 IBs for biopharmaceuticals (monoclonal antibodies) over the same time frame showed that the mean number of nonclinical studies was 17 studies per molecule with pharmacology, ADME and toxicology testing contributing 82%, 6% and 12% of the studies, respectively. For both types of molecule, similar numbers of pharmacology studies were performed but the approximately 50% fewer studies for biopharmaceuticals was due to considerably limited ADME and toxicology testing. Despite available regulatory guidance to allow calculation of a safe clinical starting dose, examination of how this occurred in the examined IBs showed that a variety of approaches are in practice, although reference to the NOAEL in toxicology testing is still key, whether in calculation of a Maximum Recommended Starting Dose (small molecules), or after use of pharmacology and/or PK data (especially for biopharmaceuticals) to show acceptable safety margins over doses used/exposure seen in toxicology studies. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADME; Biopharmaceuticals; Clinical starting dose; Investigator Brochure; Monoclonal antibodies; Nonclinical; Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacology; Small molecules; Toxicology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28751261     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  3 in total

1.  Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations.

Authors:  Paul Baldrick
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Animal Safety, Toxicology, and Pharmacokinetic Studies According to the ICH S9 Guideline for a Novel Fusion Protein tTF-NGR Targeting Procoagulatory Activity into Tumor Vasculature: Are Results Predictive for Humans?

Authors:  Wolfgang E Berdel; Saliha Harrach; Caroline Brand; Kathrin Brömmel; Andrew F Berdel; Heike Hintelmann; Christoph Schliemann; Christian Schwöppe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Justification for species selection for pharmaceutical toxicity studies.

Authors:  Helen Prior; Richard Haworth; Briony Labram; Ruth Roberts; Alison Wolfreys; Fiona Sewell
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.524

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.