| Literature DB >> 28749417 |
Abstract
Although physical activity has been widely recognized as an important influential factor in determining the risk of obesity, the results in the existing literature empirically examining such issue are mixed. Especially for China, relevant studies are rarely found. One aim of this study is to test the direction of effects between obesity and physical activity. It uses longitudinal data to investigate the relationship and causality between physical activity and obesity for both children and adults in China. The longitudinal data and dynamic panel model used here can yield more solid results than the other studies employing cross-sectional data, particularly considering strict endogeneity and self-selection. It is discovered that obesity does not affect children's physical activity but that obese children are more sedentary. For adults in China, physical activity can significantly reduce the weight, but not in the opposite direction.Entities:
Keywords: China; causality; model; obesity; physical activity; regression
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28749417 PMCID: PMC5580548 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14080844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Obesity rate over time.
Figure 2Body Mass Index (BMI) over time.
Means of six variables for Granger causality test over time.
| Year | Walking (min) | PA in School (h) | Participating in PA (0/1) | PA Before or after School (min) | Watching TV (min) | Reading or Writing (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 30.02 | 3.75 | 0.07 | 405.55 | 451.07 | |
| 2000 | 27.17 | 3.04 | 0.34 | 387.41 | 210.38 | |
| 2004 | 37.60 | 3.76 | 0.35 | 54.85 | ||
| 2006 | 39.09 | 5.97 | 0.34 | 50.81 | ||
| 2009 | 37.72 | 5.53 | 0.37 | 52.22 | ||
| 2011 | 40.86 | 6.43 | 0.34 | 58.20 |
PA: physical activity.
Explanatory covariates of panel regressions for adults.
| Year | Education | Household Income | PA | Age | Urban/Rural | Gender |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | 6.81 | 4243.57 | 31.46 | 0.69 | 0.51 | |
| 1991 | 5.22 | 4411.37 | 41.18 | 0.67 | 0.51 | |
| 1993 | 6.03 | 6174.58 | 42.09 | 0.69 | 0.51 | |
| 1997 | 6.23 | 11,754.65 | 890.99 | 43.58 | 0.65 | 0.50 |
| 2000 | 7.54 | 14,180.95 | 811.01 | 44.99 | 0.66 | 0.51 |
| 2004 | 8.71 | 18,288.92 | 1050.15 | 48.02 | 0.65 | 0.51 |
| 2006 | 8.58 | 21,801.42 | 996.72 | 49.27 | 0.66 | 0.52 |
| 2009 | 8.85 | 35,466.88 | 932.12 | 50.01 | 0.67 | 0.51 |
| 2011 | 9.09 | 44,186.12 | 939.48 | 51.68 | 0.66 | 0.52 |
Pairwise Granger Causality Tests with 1 lag.
| Null Hypothesis: | F-Statistic | Prob. |
|---|---|---|
| ‘Participating in PA’ does not cause BMI | 8.5446 *** | 0.0035 |
| BMI does not cause ‘Participating in PA’ | 1.9653 | 0.161 |
| ‘PA in school’ does not cause BMI | 2.1007 | 0.1473 |
| BMI does not cause ‘PA in school’ | 0.1818 | 0.6699 |
| ‘PA before or after school’ does not cause BMI | 9.7411 *** | 0.002 |
| BMI does not cause ‘PA before or after school’ | 2.4027 | 0.1225 |
| ‘Reading or writing’ does not cause BMI | 0.9261 | 0.3363 |
| BMI does not cause ‘Reading or writing’ | 0.1201 | 0.7291 |
| ‘Watching TV’ does not cause BMI | 0.4782 | 0.4894 |
| BMI does not cause ‘Watching TV’ | 7.9869 *** | 0.0048 |
| ‘Walking from home to school’ does not cause BMI | 3.5197 ** | 0.0298 |
| BMI does not cause ‘Walking from home to school’ | 0.1766 | 0.8382 |
Note: **, and *** give the coefficients’ significance indicated by estimated standard errors at 5% and 1% level, respectively. BMI: body mass index; TV: television.
Panel regression results for adults.
| Static Fixed Effects Regression | Static Random Effects Regression | Dynamic Panel Regression without the Lagged PA | Dynamic Panel Regression with Equation (1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban/Rural | −0.01633 | −0.06740 | 4.27214 *** | 5.40653 *** |
| Gender | 0.12796 | 0.06986 | 10.44104 *** | 9.94068 *** |
| Education | 0.00498 | 0.04019 *** | 0.00034 | −0.00976 |
| Household income (1000 Yuan) | 0.00057 | 0.00466 *** | 0.00032 | 0.00198 ** |
| Age | 0.10589 *** | 0.05322 *** | 0.03818 *** | 0.03493 *** |
| PA | −0.00002 | −0.00005 *** | −0.00006 *** | −0.00018 ** |
| BMI(t−1) | 0.46047 *** | 0.38019 *** | ||
| PA(t−1) | −0.00034 ** | |||
| PA(t−2) | 0.00005 | |||
| Constant | 18.160 *** | 19.710 *** | −12.149 *** | −10.930 ** |
| Sigma_u | 3.437 | 2.815 | ||
| Sigma_e | 2.001 | 2.001 | ||
| Test of individual effects | F = 5.77 *** | χ2 = 15,806.56 *** | ||
| Wald test for all variables | F = 305.96 *** | χ2 = 1218.46 *** | χ2 = 853.72 *** | χ2 = 734.79 *** |
Note: The null hypothesis for F or Wald test is that the coefficients are jointly equal to zero. **, and *** give the coefficients’ significance indicated by estimated standard errors at 5% and 1% level, respectively.