OBJECTIVE: To estimate the potential dose reduction in iodinated contrast when interpreting monoenergetic images from spectral CT. METHODS: 51 paediatric patients received contrast-enhanced CT simulation for radiation therapy using a single-source, dual-layer detector spectral CT. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of blood vessels were measured relative to surrounding soft tissue. CNRs on monoenergetic 40-70 keV images were compared with polychromatic 120 kVp images. To compare with in vivo results, a phantom with iodine inserts (2-20 mg ml-1 concentration) was scanned and CNRs were calculated relative to water background. RESULTS: Monoenergetic keV and body site had significant effects on CNR ratio (p < 0.0001). Across all body sites, the mean CNR ratio (monoenergetic/polychromatic CNR) was 3.3 (20th percentile [%20] 2.6), 2.4 (%20 2.1), 1.7 (%20 1.5), 1.2 (%20 1.0) for 40, 50, 60 and 70 keV images, respectively. Image noise was highest at 40 keV and lowest at 70 keV. Phantom measurements indicated that the same CNR as 120 kVp images can be achieved with a 4.0-fold lower iodine concentration on 40 keV images and 2.5-fold lower on 50 keV images. CONCLUSION: 50 keV monoenergetic images provided the best balance of improved CNR on all studies (mean 2.4-fold increase in vivo) for enhancing vessels vs image noise. A 50% reduction in contrast dose on a 50 keV image should maintain comparable or better CNR as compared with polychromatic CT in over 80% of CT studies. Advances in knowledge: Use of a novel, single-source, dual-layer detector spectral CT scanner to improve visualization of contrast-enhanced blood vessels will reduce the amount of iodinated contrast required for radiation oncology treatment planning.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the potential dose reduction in iodinated contrast when interpreting monoenergetic images from spectral CT. METHODS: 51 paediatric patients received contrast-enhanced CT simulation for radiation therapy using a single-source, dual-layer detector spectral CT. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of blood vessels were measured relative to surrounding soft tissue. CNRs on monoenergetic 40-70 keV images were compared with polychromatic 120 kVp images. To compare with in vivo results, a phantom with iodine inserts (2-20 mg ml-1 concentration) was scanned and CNRs were calculated relative to water background. RESULTS: Monoenergetic keV and body site had significant effects on CNR ratio (p < 0.0001). Across all body sites, the mean CNR ratio (monoenergetic/polychromatic CNR) was 3.3 (20th percentile [%20] 2.6), 2.4 (%20 2.1), 1.7 (%20 1.5), 1.2 (%20 1.0) for 40, 50, 60 and 70 keV images, respectively. Image noise was highest at 40 keV and lowest at 70 keV. Phantom measurements indicated that the same CNR as 120 kVp images can be achieved with a 4.0-fold lower iodine concentration on 40 keV images and 2.5-fold lower on 50 keV images. CONCLUSION: 50 keV monoenergetic images provided the best balance of improved CNR on all studies (mean 2.4-fold increase in vivo) for enhancing vessels vs image noise. A 50% reduction in contrast dose on a 50 keV image should maintain comparable or better CNR as compared with polychromatic CT in over 80% of CT studies. Advances in knowledge: Use of a novel, single-source, dual-layer detector spectral CT scanner to improve visualization of contrast-enhanced blood vessels will reduce the amount of iodinated contrast required for radiation oncology treatment planning.
Authors: Mark E Baker; Frank Dong; Andrew Primak; Nancy A Obuchowski; David Einstein; Namita Gandhi; Brian R Herts; Andrei Purysko; Erick Remer; Neil Vachhani; Neil Vachani Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lena Specht; Joachim Yahalom; Tim Illidge; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Louis S Constine; Hans Theodor Eich; Theodore Girinsky; Richard T Hoppe; Peter Mauch; N George Mikhaeel; Andrea Ng Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ji Won Lee; Geewon Lee; Nam Kyung Lee; Jin Il Moon; Yun Hye Ju; Young Ju Suh; Yeon Joo Jeong Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Robert Dinniwell; Philip Chan; Gregory Czarnota; Masoom A Haider; Kartik Jhaveri; Michael Jewett; Anthony Fyles; David Jaffray; Michael Milosevic Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Moritz H Albrecht; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Kristina Hüsers; Martin Beeres; Andreas M Bucher; Moritz Kaup; Simon S Martin; Sebastian Fischer; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Robbert W van Hamersvelt; Nienke G Eijsvoogel; Casper Mihl; Pim A de Jong; Arnold M R Schilham; Nico Buls; Marco Das; Tim Leiner; Martin J Willemink Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Rivka Kessner; Nils Große Hokamp; Les Ciancibello; Nikhil Ramaiya; Karin A Herrmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.039