| Literature DB >> 28749120 |
Abhishek Gupta1, Vertica Agnihotri, Rahul Kumar, Ashish Datt Upadhyay, Suman Bhaskar, Sadanand Dwivedi, Sharmistha Dey.
Abstract
Background: Polymorphism of NFKB1 and NFKB1A are highly associated with cancer. We have assessed polymorphism in the promoter region of NFKB1 -94 del/ins ATTG (rs28362491) and NFKB1A -826 C/T (rs2233406) with the risk of HNSCC in Indian population.Entities:
Keywords: HNSCC; NFKB1; NFKB1A; PCR-RFLP; polymorphism
Year: 2017 PMID: 28749120 PMCID: PMC5648390 DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Frequency Distribution of Selected Variables of the Controls and HNSCC Patients
| Variable | Controls (n=312) | Patients (n=312) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | |||
| 20-40 | 114 (36.54%) | 82 (26.28%) | |
| 41-60 | 115 (36.86%) | 158 (50.64%) | |
| >60 | 83 (26.60%) | 72 (23.08%) | p=0.002 |
| Mean age (year±SD) | 45.00±15.94 | 49.39±11.90 | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 247 (79.17%) | 258 (82.69%) | |
| Female | 65 (20.83%) | 54 (17.31%) | p=0.262 |
| Smoking Status | |||
| Yes | 92 (29.49%) | 228 (73.08%) | |
| No | 220 (70.51%) | 84 (26.92%) | p=0.0001 |
| Chewing Status | |||
| Yes | 86(27.56%) | 143 (45.83%) | |
| No | 226 (72.44%) | 169 (54.17%) | p=0.0001 |
| Alcoholic Status | |||
| Yes | 110 (35.26%) | 83(26.60%) | |
| No | 202 (64.74%) | 229 (73.40%) | p=0.019 |
| Histopathology | |||
| SCC | - | 66 (21.15%) | |
| WDSCC | - | 55 (17.63%) | |
| MDSCC | - | 178 (57.05%) | |
| PDSCC | - | 13 (4.17%) | |
| Stage | |||
| I+II | - | 47 (15.06%) | |
| III+IV | - | 265 (84.94%) | |
| Tumor Size | |||
| T1+T2 | - | 70 (22.44%) | |
| T3+T4 | - | 242 (77.56%) | |
| Node | |||
| N0 | - | 127 (40.71%) | |
| N+ | - | 185 (59.29%) | |
| Site | |||
| Nasopharynx | - | 11 (3.53%) | |
| Larynx | - | 45 (14.42%) | |
| Oropharynx | - | 107 (34.29%) | |
| Oral Cavity | - | 149 (47.76%) | |
MDSCC, Moderately Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma; WDSCC, Well Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma; PDSCC, Poorly Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma; SCC, Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Chi square test was performed to analyze differences between controls and patients.
Figure 1a) The Pattern of PfIMI Enzyme Digestion. Lanes 2, 5, 8, 10 and 12 are heterozygous del/insl ATTG; lanes 1, 4, 6, 7, 11 and 13 are homozygous ins/ins ATTG; and Lane 3 and 9 is homozygous del/del ATTG genotype. b) The BfaI Digestion Profile. Lanes 4, 7, 8 and 10 are heterozygous CT; lanes 1, 3, 5, 6 and 9 are homozygous GG; and Lane 2 is homozygous CC genotype.
Distribution Frequencies for NFKB1 Promoter –94 del/ins ATTG and NFKB1A -826 C/T Genotypes in Controls and Patients.
| Variable | Controls (n=312) | Patients (n=312) | OR (95% CI) | p value | AOR (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFKB1 Genotype | ||||||
| del/del | 22 (7.05%) | 18 (5.77%) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||
| del/ins | 146 (46.79%) | 162 (51.92%) | 1.35 (0.69-2.62) | 0.367 | 2.36 (1.06-5.23) | 0.034 |
| ins/ins | 144 (46.15%) | 132 (42.31%) | 1.12 (0.57-2.18) | 0.738 | 1.75 (0.79-3.89) | 0.164 |
| del/ins+ins/ins | 290 (92.95%) | 294 (94.23%) | 1.23 (0.65-2.35) | 0.514 | 2.04 (0.94-4.41) | 0.068 |
| NFKB1A Genotype | ||||||
| CC | 16 (5.13%) | 32 (10.26%) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||
| CT | 208 (66.67%) | 199 (63.78%) | 0.47 (0.25-0.89) | 0.022 | 0.47 (0.22-0.98) | 0.046 |
| TT | 88 (28.21%) | 81 (25.96%) | 0.46 (0.23-0.90) | 0.024 | 0.42 (0.19-0.92) | 0.031 |
| CT+TT | 296 (94.87%) | 280 (89.94%) | 0.47 (0.25-0.88) | 0.018 | 0.46 (0.22-0.94) | 0.034 |
OR, Odd Ratios; AOR, Adjusted Odd Ratios; ORs with 95% CIs were estimated by logistic regression models; AORs with 95% CIs were estimated by multiple logistic regression models after controlling for sex, age, tobacco chewing, alcohol consumption, and smoking status.
Interactive Effect of Smoking, Chewing and Alcohol Consumption on NFKB1 –94 del/ins ATTG Polymorphism
| Variable | Controls | Patients | OR (95% C.I.) | p value | AOR (95% C.I.) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking | ||||||
| del/del without NS | 11 (3.65%) | 5 (1.67%) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||
| del/ins or ins/ins without S | 209 (69.44%) | 79 (26.42%) | 0.83 (0.28-2.46) | 0.74 | 1.03 (0.32-3.29) | 0.06 |
| del/ins or ins/ins with S | 81 (26.91%) | 215 (71.91%) | 5.83 (1.96-17.32) | 0.001 | 13.96 (4.22-46.11) | 0.0001 |
| Chewing | ||||||
| del/del without NC | 14 (66.67%) | 7 (2.33%) | 1(ref) | 1(ref) | ||
| del/ins or ins/ins without C | 212 (69.74%) | 162 (53.82%) | 1.52 (0.60-3.87) | 0.371 | 2.15 (0.77-6.03) | 0.143 |
| del/ins or ins/ins with C | 78 (25.66%) | 132 (43.85%) | 3.38 (1.30-8.74) | 0.012 | 10.92 (3.68-32.40) | 0.0001 |
| Alcoholic | ||||||
| del/del without NA | 14 (4.61%) | 14 (4.55%) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||
| del/ins or ins/ins without A | 188 (61.84%) | 215 (69.81%) | 1.14 (0.53-2.46) | 0.731 | 2.06 (0.81-5.26) | 0.129 |
| del/ins or ins/ins with A | 102 (33.55%) | 79 (25.65%) | 0.77 (0.34-1.71) | 0.53 | 0.81 (0.31-2.13) | 0.679 |
OR, Odd Ratios; AOR, Adjusted Odd Ratios; NS, Non smoking; S, Smoking; NC, Non Chewing; NA, Non alcoholic; A, alcoholic; ORs with 95% CIs were estimated by logistic regression models; AORs with 95% CIs were estimated by multiple logistic regression models after controlling for sex, age, smoketobacco chewing and alcohol consumption status.