Literature DB >> 28748601

Substrate specificity in the context of molecular chaperones.

Dipayan Bose1, Abhijit Chakrabarti1.   

Abstract

Molecular chaperones are one of the key players in protein biology and as such their structure and mechanism of action have been extensively studied. However the substrate specificity of molecular chaperones has not been well investigated. This review aims to summarize what is known about the substrate specificity and substrate recognition motifs of chaperones so as to better understand what substrate specificity means in the context of molecular chaperones. Available literature shows that the majority of chaperones have broad substrate range and recognize non-native conformations of proteins depending on recognition of hydrophobic and/or charged patches. Based on these recognition motifs chaperones can select for early, mid or late folding intermediates. Another major contributor to chaperone specificity are the co-chaperones they interact with as well as the sub-cellular location they are expressed in and the inducability of their expression. Some chaperones which have only one or a few known substrates are reported. In their case the mode of recognition seems to be specific structural complementarity between chaperone and substrate. It can be concluded that the vast majority of chaperones do not show a high degree of specificity but recognize elements that signal non-native protein conformation and their substrate range is modulated by the context they function in. However a few chaperones are known that display exquisite specificity of their substrate e.g. mammalian heat shock protein 47 collagen interaction.
© 2017 IUBMB Life, 69(9):647-659, 2017. © 2017 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chaperone; recognition motif; substrate-specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28748601     DOI: 10.1002/iub.1656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IUBMB Life        ISSN: 1521-6543            Impact factor:   3.885


  7 in total

1.  Autonomous aggregation suppression by acidic residues explains why chaperones favour basic residues.

Authors:  Bert Houben; Emiel Michiels; Meine Ramakers; Katerina Konstantoulea; Nikolaos Louros; Joffré Verniers; Rob van der Kant; Matthias De Vleeschouwer; Nuno Chicória; Thomas Vanpoucke; Rodrigo Gallardo; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Direct exposure to mild heat stress stimulates cell viability and heat shock protein expression in primary cultured broiler fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sharif Hasan Siddiqui; Sivakumar Allur Subramaniyan; Darae Kang; Jinryong Park; Mousumee Khan; Hyun Woo Choi; Kwanseob Shim
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 3.  Roles of the endoplasmic reticulum-resident, collagen-specific molecular chaperone Hsp47 in vertebrate cells and human disease.

Authors:  Shinya Ito; Kazuhiro Nagata
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Development of GMP-1 a molecular chaperone network modulator protecting mitochondrial function and its assessment in fly and mice models of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Pavel F Pavlov; Birgit Hutter-Paier; Daniel Havas; Manfred Windisch; Bengt Winblad
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 5.310

5.  Interactions between nascent proteins and the ribosome surface inhibit co-translational folding.

Authors:  Anaïs M E Cassaignau; Tomasz Włodarski; Sammy H S Chan; Lauren F Woodburn; Ivana V Bukvin; Julian O Streit; Lisa D Cabrita; Christopher A Waudby; John Christodoulou
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 24.427

6.  Single residue modulators of amyloid formation in the N-terminal P1-region of α-synuclein.

Authors:  Sabine M Ulamec; Roberto Maya-Martinez; Emily J Byrd; Katherine M Dewison; Yong Xu; Leon F Willis; Frank Sobott; George R Heath; Patricija van Oosten Hawle; Vladimir L Buchman; Sheena E Radford; David J Brockwell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Novel cryo-EM structure of an ADP-bound GroEL-GroES complex.

Authors:  Sofia S Kudryavtseva; Evgeny B Pichkur; Igor A Yaroshevich; Aleksandra A Mamchur; Irina S Panina; Andrei V Moiseenko; Olga S Sokolova; Vladimir I Muronetz; Tatiana B Stanishneva-Konovalova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.