OBJECTIVE: Electrical neuromodulation therapies typically apply constant frequency stimulation, but non-regular temporal patterns of stimulation may be more effective and more efficient. However, the design space for temporal patterns is exceedingly large, and model-based optimization is required for pattern design. We designed and implemented a modified genetic algorithm (GA) intended for design optimal temporal patterns of electrical neuromodulation. APPROACH: We tested and modified standard GA methods for application to designing temporal patterns of neural stimulation. We evaluated each modification individually and all modifications collectively by comparing performance to the standard GA across three test functions and two biophysically-based models of neural stimulation. MAIN RESULTS: The proposed modifications of the GA significantly improved performance across the test functions and performed best when all were used collectively. The standard GA found patterns that outperformed fixed-frequency, clinically-standard patterns in biophysically-based models of neural stimulation, but the modified GA, in many fewer iterations, consistently converged to higher-scoring, non-regular patterns of stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed improvements to standard GA methodology reduced the number of iterations required for convergence and identified superior solutions.
OBJECTIVE: Electrical neuromodulation therapies typically apply constant frequency stimulation, but non-regular temporal patterns of stimulation may be more effective and more efficient. However, the design space for temporal patterns is exceedingly large, and model-based optimization is required for pattern design. We designed and implemented a modified genetic algorithm (GA) intended for design optimal temporal patterns of electrical neuromodulation. APPROACH: We tested and modified standard GA methods for application to designing temporal patterns of neural stimulation. We evaluated each modification individually and all modifications collectively by comparing performance to the standard GA across three test functions and two biophysically-based models of neural stimulation. MAIN RESULTS: The proposed modifications of the GA significantly improved performance across the test functions and performed best when all were used collectively. The standard GA found patterns that outperformed fixed-frequency, clinically-standard patterns in biophysically-based models of neural stimulation, but the modified GA, in many fewer iterations, consistently converged to higher-scoring, non-regular patterns of stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed improvements to standard GA methodology reduced the number of iterations required for convergence and identified superior solutions.
Authors: Muhammad M Edhi; Lonne Heijmans; Kevin N Vanent; Kiernan Bloye; Amanda Baanante; Ki-Soo Jeong; Jason Leung; Changfang Zhu; Rosana Esteller; Carl Y Saab Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Vinata Vedam-Mai; Karl Deisseroth; James Giordano; Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz; Winston Chiong; Nanthia Suthana; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Jay Gill; Wayne Goodman; Nicole R Provenza; Casey H Halpern; Rajat S Shivacharan; Tricia N Cunningham; Sameer A Sheth; Nader Pouratian; Katherine W Scangos; Helen S Mayberg; Andreas Horn; Kara A Johnson; Christopher R Butson; Ro'ee Gilron; Coralie de Hemptinne; Robert Wilt; Maria Yaroshinsky; Simon Little; Philip Starr; Greg Worrell; Prasad Shirvalkar; Edward Chang; Jens Volkmann; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Sergiu Groppa; Andrea A Kühn; Luming Li; Matthew Johnson; Kevin J Otto; Robert Raike; Steve Goetz; Chengyuan Wu; Peter Silburn; Binith Cheeran; Yagna J Pathak; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Aysegul Gunduz; Joshua K Wong; Stephanie Cernera; Wei Hu; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Wissam Deeb; Addie Patterson; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Joachim K Krauss; Nir Lipsman; Tipu Aziz; Alexandre Boutet; Peter Brown; Jin Woo Chang; Benjamin Davidson; Warren M Grill; Marwan I Hariz; Andreas Horn; Michael Schulder; Antonios Mammis; Peter A Tass; Jens Volkmann; Andres M Lozano Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 42.937