Literature DB >> 28747274

Efficacy, safety, and effect on sexual behaviour of on-demand pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in men who have sex with men: an observational cohort study.

Jean-Michel Molina1, Isabelle Charreau2, Bruno Spire3, Laurent Cotte4, Julie Chas5, Catherine Capitant2, Cecile Tremblay6, Daniela Rojas-Castro7, Eric Cua8, Armelle Pasquet9, Camille Bernaud10, Claire Pintado11, Constance Delaugerre12, Luis Sagaon-Teyssier3, Soizic Le Mestre13, Christian Chidiac4, Gilles Pialoux5, Diane Ponscarme11, Julien Fonsart11, David Thompson14, Mark A Wainberg15, Veronique Doré13, Laurence Meyer16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data for on-demand pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are scarce. We implemented a cohort study to assess its efficacy, safety, and effect on sexual behaviour.
METHODS: We invited men and transgender women who have sex with men, previously enrolled in the randomised placebo-controlled ANRS IPERGAY trial at seven sites (six in France and one in Canada), to participate in an open-label extension with on-demand tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg) and emtricitabine (200 mg) to be taken before and after sexual intercourse. We assessed the incidence of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), PrEP adherence, safety, and sexual behaviour. Statistical analyses included comparisons of proportions and incidence between the randomised phase of the ANRS IPERGAY trial and the open-label phase, and all participants were included in safety analyses. ANRS IPERGAY is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01473472.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 4, 2014, and Jan 27, 2015, we enrolled 361 participants. Median follow-up was 18·4 months (IQR 17·7-19·1). One participant who discontinued PrEP acquired HIV infection. HIV incidence was 0·19 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0·01-1·08), compared with 6·60 per 100 person-years (3·60-11·05) in the placebo group of the randomised study, indicating a relative reduction of 97% (95% CI 81-100) in the incidence of HIV with on-demand PrEP. Participants used a median of 18 pills of study drugs per month (IQR 11-25), and at the 6 month visit 240 (71%) of 336 participants had tenofovir detected in plasma. Drug-related gastrointestinal events were reported in 49 participants (14%) but were self-limited. Only four participants (1%) discontinued PrEP, three because of an increase in plasma creatinine. The proportion of participants reporting condomless sex at their last receptive anal intercourse significantly increased from 77% (136 of 176 participants) at baseline to 86% (66 of 77 participants) at 18 months' follow-up (p for trend=0·0004). The incidence of a first bacterial STI during this open-label phase did not change significantly compared with the randomised phase (59·0 vs 49·1 per 100 person-years, respectively; p=0·11).
INTERPRETATION: On-demand oral PrEP is highly effective at preventing HIV infection among high-risk men who have sex with men and therefore represents an alternative to daily PrEP, expanding choices for HIV prevention. High rates of STIs resulting from low condom use did not undermine PrEP efficacy, but warrant frequent testing. FUNDING: ANRS (France Recherche Nord and Sud Sida-HIV Hépatites), the Canadian HIV Trials Network, Fonds Pierre Bergé-Sidaction, Gilead Sciences, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28747274     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30089-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet HIV        ISSN: 2352-3018            Impact factor:   12.767


  148 in total

Review 1.  Weighing the Evidence of Efficacy of Oral PrEP for HIV Prevention in Women in Southern Africa.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Lawrence Corey; Gita Ramjee; Lindsay N Carpp; Carl Lombard; Myron S Cohen; Peter B Gilbert; Glenda E Gray
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.205

Review 2.  Update on HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis: Effectiveness, Drug Resistance, and Risk Compensation.

Authors:  Victoria E Powell; Kevin M Gibas; Joshua DuBow; Douglas S Krakower
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Why we need pre-exposure prophylaxis: incident HIV and syphilis among men, and transgender women, who have sex with men, Bangkok, Thailand, 2005-2015.

Authors:  T H Holtz; W Wimonsate; P A Mock; S Pattanasin; W Chonwattana; W Thienkrua; W Sukwicha; M E Curlin; A Chitwarakorn; E F Dunne
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.359

Review 4.  Potential kidney toxicity from the antiviral drug tenofovir: new indications, new formulations, and a new prodrug.

Authors:  Lili Chan; Benjamin Asriel; Ellen F Eaton; Christina M Wyatt
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) Awareness and Non-Occupational PEP (nPEP) Prescribing History Among U.S. Healthcare Providers.

Authors:  Steven A John; Katherine G Quinn; Benedikt Pleuhs; Jennifer L Walsh; Andrew E Petroll
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2020-11

Review 6.  Confronting Rising STIs in the Era of PrEP and Treatment as Prevention.

Authors:  Meena S Ramchandani; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.071

7.  Insurance- and medical provider-related barriers and facilitators to staying on PrEP: results from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alexa B D'Angelo; Javier Lopez-Rios; Anthony W P Flynn; Ian W Holloway; David W Pantalone; Christian Grov
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  The Impact of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis on Sexual Well-Being Among Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Hanne M L Zimmermann; Lisa R Postma; Roel C A Achterbergh; Thijs Reyniers; Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Maria Prins; Henry J C de Vries; Elske Hoornenborg; Udi Davidovich
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 9.  Initiation, discontinuation, and restarting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: ongoing implementation strategies.

Authors:  Sarah E Rutstein; Dawn K Smith; Shona Dalal; Rachel C Baggaley; Myron S Cohen
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 12.767

10.  How Do Gay and Bisexual Men Make Up for Missed PrEP Doses, and What Impact Does Missing a Dose Have on Their Subsequent Sexual Behavior?

Authors:  Christian Grov; Alexa B D'Angelo; Anthony W P Flynn; Javier Lopez-Rios; David W Pantalone; Ian W Holloway; Thomas H F Whitfield; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2018-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.