| Literature DB >> 28746492 |
Rocío M Lecca-Morales1, Marcos J Carruitero2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: : the objective of the study was to determine the relationship between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturation in a Peruvian sample.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28746492 PMCID: PMC5525450 DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.089-096.oar
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dental Press J Orthod ISSN: 2176-9451
Description of the sample by sex and average age.
| Sex | n | % | Average age* | Standard deviation | Range (years) |
| Male | 34 | 43.6 | 9.4 | 2.4 | 7 - 17 |
| Female | 44 | 56.4 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 7 - 16 |
| Total | 78 | 100 | 9.9 | 2.5 | 7 - 17 |
*No difference between sex, t = -0.89, p = 0.188.
Dental calcification stages using the Demirjian Index method.
| Stage | Characteristics |
| A | Calcification of single occlusal points without fusion of different calcifications. |
| B | Fusion of mineralization points; the contour of the occlusal surface is recognizable. |
| C | Enamel formation has been completed at the occlusal surface, and dentin formation has commenced. The pulp chamber is curved, and no pulp horns are visible. |
| D | Crown formation has been completed to the level of the cement-enamel junction. Root formation has commenced. The pulp horns are beginning to differentiate, but the walls of the pulp chamber remain curve. |
| E | The root length remains shorter than the crown height. The walls of the pulp chamber are straight, and the pulp horns have become more differentiated than in the previous stage. In the molars, the radicular bifurcation has commenced to calcify. |
| F | The walls of the pulp chamber now form an isosceles triangle, and the root length is equal to or greater than the crown height. In the molars, the bifurcation has developed sufficiently to give the roots a distinct form. |
| G | The walls of the root canal are now parallel, but the apical end is partially open. In molars, only the distal root is rated. |
| H | The root apex is complete. |
Skeletal maturation indicators (SMI) by the hand-wrist method of Fishman.
| Stage | Characteristics |
| SMI 1 | Epiphysis equal in width to diaphysis in the proximal phalanx of the third finger. |
| SMI 2 | Epiphysis equal in width to diaphysis in the middle phalanx of the third finger. |
| SMI 3 | Epiphysis equal in width to diaphysis in the middle phalanx of the fifth finger. |
| SMI 4 | Ossification of adductor sesamoid of thumb. |
| SMI 5 | Capping of epiphysis in the distal phalanx of the third finger. |
| SMI 6 | Capping of epiphysis in the middle phalanx of the third finger. |
| SMI 7 | Capping of epiphysis in the middle phalanx of the fifth finger. |
| SMI 8 | Fusion of epiphysis to diaphysis in the distal phalanx of the third finger. |
| SMI 9 | Fusion of epiphysis to diaphysis in the proximal phalanx of the third finger. |
| SMI 10 | Fusion of epiphysis to diaphysis in the middle phalanx of the third finger. |
| SMI 11 | Fusion of epiphysis to diaphysis in the radius. |
Definitions of cervical stages (CS) using the cervical vertebrae method.
| Stage | Characteristics |
| CS1 | The lower borders of all the three vertebrae (C2-C4) are flat. The bodies of both C3 and C4 are trapezoid in shape (the superior border of the vertebral body is tapered from posterior to anterior). |
| CS2 | A concavity is present at the lower border of C2 (in four of five cases, with the remaining subjects still showing CS 1). The bodies of both C3 and C4 are still trapezoid in shape. |
| CS3 | Concavities at the lower borders of both C2 and C3 are present. The bodies of C3 and C4 might be either trapezoid or rectangular and horizontal in shape. |
| CS4 | Concavities at the lower borders of C2, C3, and C4 now are present. The bodies of both C3 and C4 are rectangular and horizontal in shape. |
| CS5 | The concavities at the lower borders of C2, C3, and C4 are still present. At least one of the bodies of C3 and C4 is squared in shape. If not squared, the body of the other cervical vertebra is rectangular and horizontal. |
| CS6 | The concavities at the lower borders of C2, C3, and C4 are still evident. At least one of the bodies of C3 and C4 is rectangular and vertical in shape. If not rectangular and vertical, the body of the other cervical vertebra is squared. |
Spearman’s correlations among HWMF, CVM and DM (n = 78).
| DM | HWMF | CVM | ||||
| Canine | 1st PM | 2nd PM | 2nd M | |||
| HWMF | 0.697 | 0.739 | 0.748 | 0.758 | 1.000 | 0.817 |
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| CVM | 0.554 | 0.603 | 0.605 | 0.605 | 0.817 | 1.000 |
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Spearman’s correlation among HWMF, CVM and DM by sex.
| Sex | DM | CVM | HWMF | ||||
| Canine | 1st PM | 2nd PM | 2nd M | ||||
| Male (n=34) | HWMF | 0.710 | 0.761 | 0.784 | 0.800 | 0.829 | 1.000 |
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| CVM | 0.578 | 0.585 | 0.634 | 0.684 | 1.000 | 0.829 | |
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Female (n=44) | HWMF | 0.710 | 0.754 | 0.759 | 0.792 | 0.812 | 1.000 |
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| CVM | 0.542 | 0.644 | 0.600 | 0.534 | 1.000 | 0.812 | |
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Associations between pubertal growth spurt/mandibular growth peak and DM stages of mandibular second molar and second premolar (teeth that showed higher correlation).
| DM stages of mandibular second molar | |||||||||||||||||
| Teeth | Method | Growth | C | D | E | F | G | H | Total | P | |||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||||
| 2nd molar | HWMF | Outside the pubertal growth spurt | 29 | 37.2 | 17 | 21.8 | 6 | 7.7 | 9 | 11.5 | 3 | 3.8 | 9 | 11.5 | 73 | 93.6 | 0.004 |
| Inside the pubertal growth spurt | 1 | 1.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 3.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 5 | 6.4 | |||
| Total | 30 | 38.5 | 17 | 21.8 | 7 | 9.0 | 9 | 11.5 | 6 | 7.7 | 9 | 11.5 | 78 | 100.0 | |||
| CVM | Outside of mandibular growth peak | 25 | 32.1 | 15 | 19.2 | 4 | 5.1 | 4 | 5.1 | 3 | 3.8 | 8 | 10.3 | 59 | 75.6 | 0.037 | |
| Inside of mandibular growth peak | 5 | 6.4 | 2 | 2.6 | 3 | 3.8 | 5 | 6.4 | 3 | 3.8 | 1 | 1.3 | 19 | 24.4 | |||
| Total | 30 | 38.5 | 17 | 21.8 | 7 | 9.0 | 9 | 11.5 | 6 | 7.7 | 9 | 11.5 | 78 | 100.0 | |||
| 2nd premolar | HWMF | Outside the pubertal growth spurt | 1 | 1.3 | 25 | 32.1 | 24 | 30.8 | 10 | 12.8 | 4 | 5.1 | 9 | 11.5 | 73 | 93.6 | 0.140 |
| Inside the pubertal growth spurt | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.3 | 1 | 1.3 | 2 | 2.6 | 5 | 6.4 | |||
| Total | 3 | 1.3 | 26 | 33.3 | 24 | 30.8 | 11 | 14.1 | 5 | 6.4 | 11 | 14.1 | 78 | 100.0 | |||
| CVM | Outside of mandibular growth peak | 1 | 1.3 | 23 | 29.5 | 17 | 21.8 | 7 | 9.0 | 2 | 2.6 | 9 | 11.5 | 59 | 75.6 | 0.160 | |
| Inside of mandibular growth peak | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 3.9 | 7 | 9.0 | 4 | 5.1 | 3 | 3.9 | 2 | 2.6 | 19 | 24.4 | |||
| Total | 3 | 1.3 | 26 | 33.3 | 24 | 30.8 | 11 | 14.1 | 5 | 6.4 | 11 | 14.1 | 78 | 100.0 | |||