Literature DB >> 28745067

Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent for Biobanking: A Systematic Review.

Elizabeth R Eisenhauer1, Alan R Tait1, Soo Young Rieh1, Cynthia M Arslanian-Engoren1.   

Abstract

Nurses are increasingly asked to obtain consent from participants for biobanking studies. Biobanking has added unique complexities to informed consent. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate participants' level of understanding of the information presented during the informed consent process unique to the donation of biological specimens for research. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to conduct the review. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest bibliographic databases were searched. Results indicated that elements of informed consent unique to biobanking were poorly understood. Most studies had authors or funding associated with a biobank. Only one study disclosed and assessed participants' understanding of moral risks. Increased disclosures, values-clarification, and presenting information via multiple modalities may facilitate understanding. There is a need to improve the quality of informed consent for biobanking studies by utilizing standardized instruments, definitions, and encouraging research about informed choice outside the biobanking industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biobanking; biological specimen banks; informed consent; moral risks; understanding

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28745067     DOI: 10.1177/1054773817722690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nurs Res        ISSN: 1054-7738            Impact factor:   2.075


  13 in total

1.  Facilitating Informed Permission/Assent/Consent in Pediatric Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Communicating With Diverse Patients About Participating in a Biobank: A Randomized Multisite Study Comparing Electronic and Face-to-Face Informed Consent Processes.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; Kai Wang; Laura A Shinkunas; Daniel T Stein; Paul Meissner; Maureen Smith; Rebecca Pentz; David W Klein
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Understanding of Critical Elements of Informed Consent in Genomic Research: A Case of a Paediatric HIV-TB Research Project in Uganda.

Authors:  Francis Anyaka Amayoa; Frederick Nelson Nakwagala; John Barugahare; Ian Guyton Munabi; Erisa Sabakaki Mwaka
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 1.978

4.  "I Want to Do It, But I Want to Make Sure That I Do It Right." Views of Patients with Parkinson's Disease Regarding Early Stem Cell Clinical Trial Participation.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Michael Holtzman; Katrina S Hacker
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2020-06-09

5.  Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Angelina Olesen; Zurina Mahadi; Maznah Ibrahim
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

6.  Equitable Participation in Biobanks: The Risks and Benefits of a "Dynamic Consent" Approach.

Authors:  Megan Prictor; Harriet J A Teare; Jane Kaye
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-05

7.  Tygerberg Research Ubuntu-Inspired Community Engagement Model: Integrating Community Engagement into Genomic Biobanking.

Authors:  Keymanthri Moodley; Chad Beyer
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Health data research on sudden cardiac arrest: perspectives of survivors and their next-of-kin.

Authors:  Marieke A R Bak; Rens Veeken; Marieke T Blom; Hanno L Tan; Dick L Willems
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Development of a Multi-Study Repository to Support Research on Veteran Health: The VA Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center-Durham (CSPEC-Durham) Data and Specimen Repository.

Authors:  Meghan C O'Leary; R Lawrence Whitley; Ashlyn Press; Dawn Provenzale; Christina D Williams; Blair Chesnut; Rodney Jones; Thomas S Redding; Kellie J Sims
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-02-17

10.  Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.

Authors:  Alicia VandeVusse; Jennifer Mueller; Sebastian Karcher
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.