N T Phippen1, A A Secord2, S Wolf3, G Samsa3, B Davidson2, A P Abernethy4, D Cella5, L J Havrilesky2, R A Burger6, B J Monk7, C A Leath8. 1. Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Murtha Cancer Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 7. Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Creighton University, USA. 8. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: cleath@uabmc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate association between baseline quality of life (QOL) and changes in QOL measured by FACT-O TOI with progression-free disease (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: Patients enrolled in GOG-0218 with completed FACT-O TOI assessments at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment were eligible. Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were sorted by quartiles (Q1-4) and outcomes compared between Q1 and Q2-4 with log-rank statistic and multivariate Cox regression adjusting for age, stage, post-surgical residual disease size, and performance status (PS). Trends in FACT-O TOI scores from baseline to the latest follow-up assessment were evaluated for impact on intragroup (Q1 or Q2-4) outcome by log-rank analysis. RESULTS: Of 1152 eligible patients, 283 formed Q1 and 869 formed Q2-4. Mean baseline FACT-O TOI scores were 47.5 for Q1 vs. 74.7 for Q2-4 (P<0.001). Q1 compared to Q2-4 had worse median OS (37.5 vs. 45.6months, P=0.001) and worse median PFS (12.5 vs. 13.1months, P=0.096). Q2-4 patients had decreased risks of disease progression (HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.953-0.995, P=0.018), and death (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.939-0.987, P=0.003) for each five-point increase in baseline FACT-O TOI. Improving versus worsening trends in FACT-O TOI scores were associated with longer median PFS (Q1: 12.7 vs. 8.6months, P=0.001; Q2-4: 16.7 vs. 11.1months, P<0.001) and median OS (Q1: 40.8 vs. 16months, P<0.001; Q2-4: 54.4 vs. 33.6months, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were independently prognostic of PFS and OS while improving compared to worsening QOL was associated with significantly better PFS and OS in women with EOC.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate association between baseline quality of life (QOL) and changes in QOL measured by FACT-O TOI with progression-free disease (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS:Patients enrolled in GOG-0218 with completed FACT-O TOI assessments at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment were eligible. Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were sorted by quartiles (Q1-4) and outcomes compared between Q1 and Q2-4 with log-rank statistic and multivariate Cox regression adjusting for age, stage, post-surgical residual disease size, and performance status (PS). Trends in FACT-O TOI scores from baseline to the latest follow-up assessment were evaluated for impact on intragroup (Q1 or Q2-4) outcome by log-rank analysis. RESULTS: Of 1152 eligible patients, 283 formed Q1 and 869 formed Q2-4. Mean baseline FACT-O TOI scores were 47.5 for Q1 vs. 74.7 for Q2-4 (P<0.001). Q1 compared to Q2-4 had worse median OS (37.5 vs. 45.6months, P=0.001) and worse median PFS (12.5 vs. 13.1months, P=0.096). Q2-4 patients had decreased risks of disease progression (HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.953-0.995, P=0.018), and death (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.939-0.987, P=0.003) for each five-point increase in baseline FACT-O TOI. Improving versus worsening trends in FACT-O TOI scores were associated with longer median PFS (Q1: 12.7 vs. 8.6months, P=0.001; Q2-4: 16.7 vs. 11.1months, P<0.001) and median OS (Q1: 40.8 vs. 16months, P<0.001; Q2-4: 54.4 vs. 33.6months, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were independently prognostic of PFS and OS while improving compared to worsening QOL was associated with significantly better PFS and OS in women with EOC.
Authors: Giovanni D Aletti; Sean C Dowdy; Bobbie S Gostout; Monica B Jones; C Robert Stanhope; Timothy O Wilson; Karl C Podratz; William A Cliby Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Deborah K Armstrong; Brian Bundy; Lari Wenzel; Helen Q Huang; Rebecca Baergen; Shashikant Lele; Larry J Copeland; Joan L Walker; Robert A Burger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K Basen-Engquist; D Bodurka-Bevers; M A Fitzgerald; K Webster; D Cella; S Hu; D M Gershenson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Therese Djärv; Chris Metcalfe; Kerry N L Avery; Pernilla Lagergren; Jane M Blazeby Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D S Chi; E L Eisenhauer; J Lang; J Huh; L Haddad; N R Abu-Rustum; Y Sonoda; D A Levine; M Hensley; R R Barakat Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2006-05-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: William E Winter; G Larry Maxwell; Chunqiao Tian; Michael J Sundborg; G Scott Rose; Peter G Rose; Stephen C Rubin; Franco Muggia; William P McGuire Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: William E Winter; G Larry Maxwell; Chunqiao Tian; Jay W Carlson; Robert F Ozols; Peter G Rose; Maurie Markman; Deborah K Armstrong; Franco Muggia; William P McGuire Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D E Ediebah; C Coens; E Zikos; C Quinten; J Ringash; M T King; J Schmucker von Koch; C Gotay; E Greimel; H Flechtner; J Weis; B B Reeve; E F Smit; M J B Taphoorn; A Bottomley Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: David Cella; Viktor Grünwald; Bernard Escudier; Hans J Hammers; Saby George; Paul Nathan; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Brian I Rini; Justin Doan; Cristina Ivanescu; Jean Paty; Sabeen Mekan; Robert J Motzer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Lari Wenzel; Kathryn Osann; Chelsea McKinney; David Cella; Giulia Fulci; Mary J Scroggins; Heather A Lankes; Victoria Wang; Kenneth P Nephew; George L Maxwell; Samuel C Mok; Thomas P Conrads; Austin Miller; Robert S Mannel; Heidi J Gray; Parviz Hanjani; Warner K Huh; Nick Spirtos; Mario M Leitao; Gretchen Glaser; Sudarshan K Sharma; Alessandro D Santin; Paul Sperduto; Shashikant B Lele; Robert A Burger; Bradley J Monk; Michael Birrer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506