Literature DB >> 28742783

End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Protective Ventilation in the Operating Room.

Matthieu Biais1,2, Mathilde Larghi1, Jeremy Henriot1, Hugues de Courson1, Musa Sesay1, Karine Nouette-Gaulain1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) has been proposed to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. The utility of this test during low-tidal-volume ventilation remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine whether hemodynamic variations induced by EEOT could predict the effect of volume expansion in patients with protective ventilation in the operating room.
METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing neurosurgery were included. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variations were continuously recorded using pulse contour analysis before and immediately after a 30-second EEOT and after volume expansion (250 mL saline 0.9% given over 10 minutes). Patients with an increase in stroke volume ≥ 10% after volume expansion were defined as responders.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were responders to fluid administration. EEOT induced a significant increase in stroke volume, which was correlated with the stroke volume changes induced by volume expansion (r = 0.55, P < .0001). A 5% increase in stroke volume during EEOT discriminated responders to volume expansion with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%), a specificity of 81% (95% CI, 58%-95%), a positive predictive value of 84% (95% CI, 64%-96%), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 80%-100%). The gray zone ranged from 4% to 8%, including 17% of patients. The best pulse pressure variation threshold was 9%, with a sensitivity of 60% (95% CI, 36%-81%) and specificity of 86% (95% CI, 64%-97%). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve generated for changes in stroke volume induced by EEOT (0.91, 95% CI, 0.81-1.00) was significantly higher than the one obtained for pulse pressure variations (0.75, 95% CI, 0.60-0.90); P < .05.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in stroke volume index induced by EEOT can predict fluid responsiveness in patients with protective ventilation in the operating room. This test may have potential applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28742783     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  13 in total

1.  Update on the assessment of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg-1 over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Chiara Palandri; Silvia De Rosa; Vinicio Danzi; Efrem Bonaldi; Claudia Montagnini; Sara Baino; Federico Villa; Francesca Sala; Paola Zito; Katerina Negri; Francesco Della Corte; Gianmaria Cammarota; Laura Saderi; Giovanni Sotgiu; Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 1.977

3.  End-expiratory occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients in the operating theatre.

Authors:  Li-Ying Xu; Guo-Wei Tu; Jing Cang; Jun-Yi Hou; Ying Yu; Zhe Luo; Ke-Fang Guo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

Review 4.  Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D's and the four phases of fluid therapy.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Niels Van Regenmortel; Bernd Saugel; Brecht De Tavernier; Pieter-Jan Van Gaal; Olivier Joannes-Boyau; Jean-Louis Teboul; Todd W Rice; Monty Mythen; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Gavelli; Rui Shi; Jean-Louis Teboul; Danila Azzolina; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 6.925

6.  The end-expiratory occlusion test: please, let me hold your breath!

Authors:  Francesco Gavelli; Jean-Louis Teboul; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Evaluation of least significant changes of pulse contour analysis-derived parameters.

Authors:  Hugues de Courson; Loic Ferrer; Grégoire Cane; Eric Verchère; Musa Sesay; Karine Nouette-Gaulain; Matthieu Biais
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 8.  Management of perioperative volume therapy - monitoring and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Sander; Emmanuel Schneck; Marit Habicher
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-02-28

9.  End-expiratory occlusion maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in the intensive care unit: an echocardiographic study.

Authors:  Delphine Georges; Hugues de Courson; Romain Lanchon; Musa Sesay; Karine Nouette-Gaulain; Matthieu Biais
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Use of Pulse Pressure Variation as Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Ventilated With Low Tidal Volume: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jorge Iván Alvarado Sánchez; Juan Daniel Caicedo Ruiz; Juan José Diaztagle Fernández; Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Tascón; Luis Eduardo Cruz Martínez
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med       Date:  2020-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.