Kenji Oku1, Olga Amengual2, Shinsuke Yasuda2, Tatsuya Atsumi2. 1. Department of Medicine II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, N15 W7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan. kenoku@med.hokudai.ac.jp. 2. Department of Medicine II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, N15 W7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinical disorder characterised by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the persistence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies that are pathogenic and have pro-coagulant activities. Thrombosis in APS tends to recur and require prophylaxis; however, the stereotypical treatment for APS patients is inadequate and stratification of the thrombotic risks is important as aPL are prevalently observed in various diseases or elderly population. RECENT FINDINGS: It is previously known that the multiple positive aPL or high titre aPL correlate to thrombotic events. To progress the stratification of thrombotic risks in APS patients and to quantitatively analyse those risks, antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) and the Global Anti-phospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) were defined. These scores were raised from the large patient cohort data and either aPL profile classified in detail (aPL-S) or simplified aPL profile with classical thrombotic risk factors (GAPSS) was put into a scoring system. Both the aPL-S and GAPSS have shown a degree of accuracy in identifying high-risk APS patients, especially those at a high risk of thrombosis. However, there are several areas requiring improvement, or at least that clinicians should be aware of, before these instruments are applied in clinical practice. One such issue is standardisation of the aPL tests, including general testing of phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT). Additionally, clinicians may need to be aware of the patient's medical history, particularly with respect to the incidence of SLE, which influences the cutoff value for identifying high-risk patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinical disorder characterised by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the persistence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies that are pathogenic and have pro-coagulant activities. Thrombosis in APS tends to recur and require prophylaxis; however, the stereotypical treatment for APSpatients is inadequate and stratification of the thrombotic risks is important as aPL are prevalently observed in various diseases or elderly population. RECENT FINDINGS: It is previously known that the multiple positive aPL or high titre aPL correlate to thrombotic events. To progress the stratification of thrombotic risks in APSpatients and to quantitatively analyse those risks, antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) and the Global Anti-phospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) were defined. These scores were raised from the large patient cohort data and either aPL profile classified in detail (aPL-S) or simplified aPL profile with classical thrombotic risk factors (GAPSS) was put into a scoring system. Both the aPL-S and GAPSS have shown a degree of accuracy in identifying high-risk APSpatients, especially those at a high risk of thrombosis. However, there are several areas requiring improvement, or at least that clinicians should be aware of, before these instruments are applied in clinical practice. One such issue is standardisation of the aPL tests, including general testing of phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT). Additionally, clinicians may need to be aware of the patient's medical history, particularly with respect to the incidence of SLE, which influences the cutoff value for identifying high-risk patients.
Authors: A Ruffatti; T Del Ross; M Ciprian; M Nuzzo; M Rampudda; M T Bertero; R Bergia; P Caramaschi; D Biasi; F Capsoni; L Montaguti; R Ruffini; A Brucato; U Picillo; V Fanelli; V Riccieri; A Piccoli; G Valesini; A Doria; P L Meroni; A Tincani Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: José A Girón-González; Enrique García del Río; Carmen Rodríguez; Javier Rodríguez-Martorell; Ascensión Serrano Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Amaris Castanon; Grant Pierre; Rohan Willis; E Nigel Harris; Elizabeth Papalardo; Zurina Romay-Penabad; Alvaro Schleh; Praveen Jajoria; Monica Smikle; Karel DeCeulaer; Anne Tebo; Troy Jaskowski; Marta M Guerra; D Ware Branch; Jane E Salmon; Michelle Petri; Emilio B Gonzalez Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Sara Del Barrio-Longarela; Víctor M Martínez-Taboada; Pedro Blanco-Olavarri; Ana Merino; Leyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia; Alejandra Comins-Boo; Marcos López-Hoyos; José L Hernández Journal: Clin Rev Allergy Immunol Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 10.817