Literature DB >> 25228723

Antiphospholipid scoring: significance in diagnosis and prognosis.

K Oku1, O Amengual2, T Atsumi2.   

Abstract

Recently our group introduced the "antiphospholipid score" (aPL-S), a quantitative marker that represents aPL profile. We have validated its efficacy for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and predictive value for thrombosis. The study comprised two independent sets of patients with autoimmune diseases. In the first set of patients (n=233), the aPL-S was established by analyzing aPL profiles. In the second set of patients (n=411), the predictive value of the aPL-S for thrombosis was evaluated. To define aPL-S, we calculated the relative risks (approximated by odds ratios (ORs)) of having APS manifestations (thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity) for each of the aPL tests and devised an original formula in which aPL-S was determined by OR: aPL-S=5 × exp ([OR] -5)/4. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed a hyperbolic pattern and the area under the ROC curve value was 0.752 (0.686 for revised Sapporo criteria), implying that aPL-S is a potential quantitative marker for APS diagnosis. The OR for thrombosis in patients with a high aPL-S (≥ 30) was 5.27 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.32-11.95, p<0.0001). By multivariate analysis, an aPL-S of ≥ 30 appeared to be an independent risk factor for thrombosis (hazard ratio 3.144 (95% CI 1.383-7.150), p=0.006). The aPL-S is a useful quantitative index for diagnosing APS and may be a predictive marker for thrombosis in autoimmune diseases.
© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiphospholipid syndrome; anticardiolipin antibodies; anticoagulant; lupus; thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25228723     DOI: 10.1177/0961203314537361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lupus        ISSN: 0961-2033            Impact factor:   2.911


  6 in total

1.  Elevated partial antiphospholipid score is a strong risk factor for thrombosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a validation study.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Shuhui Sun; Qingran Yan; Chunde Bao; Qiong Fu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  How to Identify High-Risk APS Patients: Clinical Utility and Predictive Values of Validated Scores.

Authors:  Kenji Oku; Olga Amengual; Shinsuke Yasuda; Tatsuya Atsumi
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances.

Authors:  Arne Vandevelde; Katrien M J Devreese
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Primary Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Persistently Antiphospholipid Antibody-Positive Individuals: Where Do We Stand in 2018?

Authors:  Yu Zuo; Medha Barbhaiya; Doruk Erkan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: refining the value of "non-criteria" antibodies for diagnosis and clinical management.

Authors:  Pasquale Pignatelli; Evaristo Ettorre; Danilo Menichelli; Arianna Pani; Francesco Violi; Daniele Pastori
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Increased heterogeneity of brain perfusion is an early marker of central nervous system involvement in antiphospholipid antibody carriers.

Authors:  Ting-Syuan Lin; Pei-Ying Hsu; Chin-Hao Chang; Chi-Lun Ko; Yu-Min Kuo; Yen-Wen Wu; Ruoh-Fang Yen; Cheng-Han Wu; Ko-Jen Li; Yenh-Chen Hsein; Song-Chou Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.