Literature DB >> 28740713

Outcomes of minimally invasive double valve surgery.

Orlando Santana1, Steve Xydas1, Roy F Williams1, Angelo LaPietra1, Maurice Mawad1, Frederick Hasty2, Esteban Escolar1, Christos G Mihos3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Double valve surgery is associated with an increased peri-operative morbidity and mortality. A less invasive right thoracotomy approach may be a viable alternative to median sternotomy surgery in these higher-risk patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the baseline demographics, operative characteristics, and post-operative outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive double valve surgery between January 2009 and December 2011 at our institution.
RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 117 patients, of which 68 (58.1%) were female. The mean age was 73±11 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 52±11%. There were 43 (36.8%) patients with a history of congestive heart failure, 45 (38.5%) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 5 (4.3%) had a history of chronic kidney disease. The patients underwent primary (90.6%) or re-operative (9.4%) double valve surgery, which consisted of 50 (42.7%) aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair, 31 (26.5%) mitral and tricuspid valve repair, 18 (15.4%) aortic and mitral valve replacement, 17 (14.5%) mitral valve replacement with tricuspid valve repair, and 1 (0.9%) aortic valve replacement with tricuspid valve repair. Post-operatively, there were 40 (34.2%) cases of prolonged ventilation, 9 (7.7%) acute kidney injury, 6 (5.1%) re-operations for bleeding, 1 (0.9%) cerebrovascular accident, and 15 (12.8%) cases of atrial fibrillation. The mean total hospital length of stay was 12±12 days, with an in-hospital mortality of 2 (1.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach to primary or re-operative double valve surgery is feasible, may be utilized with acceptable peri-operative morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; double valve surgery; minimally invasive valve surgery; mitral valve surgery; tricuspid valve repair

Year:  2017        PMID: 28740713      PMCID: PMC5505939          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  24 in total

Review 1.  Should complex mitral valve repair be routinely performed using a minimally invasive approach?

Authors:  Anelechi C Anyanwu; David H Adams
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 2.  Is a minimally invasive approach for mitral valve surgery more cost-effective than median sternotomy?

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Maiteder Larrauri-Reyes; Carlos Zamora; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-03

3.  Combined Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery Performed via a Right Minithoracotomy Approach.

Authors:  Christos G Mihos; Andrés M Pineda; Hector Davila; Maiteder C Larrauri-Reyes; Orlando Santana
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

4.  Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience.

Authors:  Minoru Tabata; Ramanan Umakanthan; Zain Khalpey; Sary F Aranki; Gregory S Couper; Lawrence H Cohn; Prem S Shekar
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Is a minimally invasive approach for re-operative aortic valve replacement superior to standard full resternotomy?

Authors:  Andrés M Pineda; Orlando Santana; Gervasio A Lamas; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-07

6.  Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Davy C H Cheng; Janet Martin; Avtar Lal; Anno Diegeler; Thierry A Folliguet; L Wiley Nifong; Patrick Perier; Ehud Raanani; J Michael Smith; Joerg Seeburger; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

7.  Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair.

Authors:  L H Cohn; D H Adams; G S Couper; D P Bichell; D M Rosborough; S P Sears; S F Aranki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Mitral valve repair with aortic valve replacement is superior to double valve replacement.

Authors:  A Marc Gillinov; Eugene H Blackstone; Delos M Cosgrove; Jennifer White; Paul Kerr; Antonino Marullo; Patrick M McCarthy; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Mitral Repair/Replacement Composite Score: A Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force.

Authors:  Vinay Badhwar; J Scott Rankin; Xia He; Jeffrey P Jacobs; James S Gammie; Anthony P Furnary; Frank L Fazzalari; Jane Han; Sean M O'Brien; David M Shahian
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in High-Risk Patients? A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Marco Moscarelli; Khalil Fattouch; Roberto Casula; Giuseppe Speziale; Patrizio Lancellotti; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.