Literature DB >> 17599503

Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience.

Minoru Tabata1, Ramanan Umakanthan, Zain Khalpey, Sary F Aranki, Gregory S Couper, Lawrence H Cohn, Prem S Shekar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A hemisternotomy approach to minimal-access cardiac surgery is associated with a faster postoperative recovery because of reduced postoperative pain and improved respiratory function. Conversion to a full sternotomy is occasionally required for reasons that remain inadequately reported.
METHODS: Between January 1996 and June 2005, 907 cardiac surgical patients were planned for an upper hemisternotomy and 528 for a lower hemisternotomy. We retrospectively reviewed 45 patients who required conversion to a full sternotomy.
RESULTS: Twenty-four (2.6%) of 907 patients required a conversion from upper hemisternotomy because of bleeding (n = 8), ventricular dysfunction (n = 5), refractory ventricular arrhythmia (n = 3), poor exposure (n = 2), and other causes (n = 6). Eight (33.3%) of 24 patients died perioperatively. Of the 883 patients who went on to have an operation through the upper hemisternotomy approach, the mortality was 1.7% (15/883). Twenty-one (4.0%) of 528 patients required conversion from a lower hemisternotomy because of poor exposure (n = 16), bleeding (n = 1), refractory ventricular arrhythmia (n = 3), and a retained venous cannula (n = 1). None of these patients died postoperatively. Of the 507 patients who went on to have an operation through the lower hemisternotomy approach, the mortality was 1.2% (6/507).
CONCLUSION: Conversion to a full sternotomy occurs infrequently during minimal-access cardiac surgery. Upper hemisternotomy conversions are usually urgent after crossclamp removal and are often associated with serious morbidity and mortality. Conversely, lower hemisternotomy conversions are performed electively in the prebypass period because of poor exposure and are not associated with complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17599503     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  10 in total

1.  Conversion rate and contraindications for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Marcel Vollroth; Joerg Seeburger; Jens Garbade; Michael A Borger; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

2.  Complications and conversions in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Martin Moscoso Ludueña; Ardawan J Rastan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 3.  Minimally invasive concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery: the "Miami Method".

Authors:  Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

4.  Outcomes of minimally invasive double valve surgery.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Angelo LaPietra; Maurice Mawad; Frederick Hasty; Esteban Escolar; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Ravi K Ghanta; Damien J Lapar; John A Kern; Irving L Kron; Alan M Speir; Edwin Fonner; Mohammed Quader; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women's Hospital experience.

Authors:  Robert C Neely; Marko T Boskovski; Igor Gosev; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Siobhan McGurk; Marzia Leacche; Lawrence H Cohn
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

7.  Percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive valve surgery compared with median sternotomy coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery in patients with prior cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Angelo LaPietra; Maurice Mawad; Jason C Wigley; Nirat Beohar; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Does minimal-access aortic valve replacement reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation?

Authors:  Bari Murtuza; John R Pepper; Rex DeL Stanbridge; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

9.  Long-term results after mitral valve surgery using minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach: a propensity matched comparison of a large single-center series.

Authors:  Ayse Cetinkaya; Anna Geier; Karin Bramlage; Stefan Hein; Peter Bramlage; Markus Schönburg; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Manfred Richter
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Innominate vein repair after iatrogenic perforation with central venous catheter via mini-sternotomy-Case report.

Authors:  Juan A Siordia; Georganne R Ayers; Amanda Garlish; Sreekumar Subramanian
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-03-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.